Should Bank Stress Tests Be Fair?
References
- (2020) Bank stress test results and their impact on consumer credit markets. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (2011) Barycenters in the Wasserstein space. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 43(2):904–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Convergence of the backfitting algorithm for additive models. J. Australian Math. Soc. 57:316–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Equality of opportunity. Zalta EN, ed. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2015 ed.Google Scholar
- (2023) The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change. Risk (September 14). https://www.risk.net/comment/7957648/the-feds-stress-test-models-are-inaccurate-something-has-to-change.Google Scholar
- (2019) Fairness in machine learning. Accessed September 20, 2023, https://fairmlbook.org/.Google Scholar
- (2018) The impact of post stress test capital on bank lending. Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- BCBS (2019) Overview of Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Practices and Approaches (Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland).Google Scholar
- Board of Governors (2021) Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2021: Supervisory Stress Test Methodology (Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (1985) Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regression and correlation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 80:580–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) How to find plausible, severe, and useful stress scenarios. Internat. J. Central Bank. 5:205–224.Google Scholar
- (2020) Fair regression with Wasserstein barycenters. Larochelle H, Ranzato M, Hadsell R, Balcan MF, Lin H, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 7321–7331.Google Scholar
- (2022) Stress testing for commercial, investment, and custody banks. Handbook of Financial Stress Testing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 247–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Stress-testing US bank holding companies: A dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Internat. J. Forecasting 30:691–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Fairness through awareness. Proc. 3rd Innovations Theoretical Computer Sci. Conf. (ITCS ’12) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY), 214–226.Google Scholar
- (2020) March madness in Wall Street: (What) does the market learn from stress tests? J. Bank. Finance 112:105250.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Transparency and model evolution in stress testing. Preprint, submitted August 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431679.Google Scholar
- (2017) Evaluating the information in the Federal Reserve stress tests. J. Financial Intermediary 29:1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Systematic scenario selection: Stress testing and the nature of uncertainty. Quant. Finance 15:43–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The role of heterogeneity in scenario design for financial stability stress testing. Handbook of Financial Stress Testing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 98–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Do stress tests matter? Evidence from the 2014 and 2016 stress test. Working paper, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2016) Are the Federal Reserve’s stress test results predictable? J. Alternative Investments 18:82–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Stress scenario selection by empirical likelihood. Quant. Finance 15:25–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Escaping the impossibility of fairness: From formal to substantive algorithmic fairness. Philosophical Tech. 35(90):1–32.Google Scholar
- (2021) Oblivious data for fairness with kernels. J. Machine Learn. Res. 22:1–36.Google Scholar
- (2021) The information content of stress test announcements. Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2012) Can macro variables used in stress test forecast the performance of banks? Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1986) Generalized additive models. Statist. Sci. 1(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Assessing financial stability: The Capital and Loss Assessment under Stress Scenarios (CLASS) model. J. Bank. Finance 69:S35–S55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) 50 years of test (un) fairness: Lessons for machine learning. Proc. Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (FAT* ’19) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY), 49–58.Google Scholar
- (2020) Impartial predictive modeling: Ensuring group fairness in arbitrary models. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00528.Google Scholar
- (2016) A top-down approach to stress-testing banks. J. Financial Service Res. 49:229–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Understanding the Effects of the U.S. Stress Tests (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2020) Policy uncertainty and bank stress testing. J. Financial Stability 51:100761.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Projection to fairness in statistical learning, Preprint, submitted June 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11720.Google Scholar
- (2018) Does mitigating ML’s impact disparity require treatment disparity? Bengio S, Wallach H, Larochelle H, Grauman K, Cesa-Bianchi N, Garnett R, eds. Proc. 32nd Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, 31 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
- (2018) Learning adversarially fair and transferable representations. Preprint, submitted October 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06309.Google Scholar
- (2014) The information value of the stress test. J. Money Credit Bank. 46:1479–1500.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Designing stress scenarios. NBER Working Paper No. w29901, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2017) Backtesting European stress tests. NBER Working Paper No. w23083, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2019) Proxy discrimination in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Iowa Law Rev. 105:1257–1358.Google Scholar
- (2017) Choosing stress scenarios for systemic risk through dimension reduction. Risk and Policy Analysis Unit Paper No. RPA 17-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2020) Banking stress test effects on returns and risks. J. Bank. Finance 117:105843.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Capital adequacy pre- and postcrisis and the role of stress testing. J. Money Credit Bank. 52:87–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

