Effects of Supportive Leadership Behaviors on Employee Satisfaction, Engagement, and Performance: An Experimental Field Investigation

References

• Alan S, Corekcioglu G, Sutter M (2022) Improving workplace climate in large corporations: A clustered randomized intervention. Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):151–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• An S-H, Meier KJ, Ladenburg J, Westergård-Nielsen N (2020) Leadership and job satisfaction: Addressing endogeneity with panel data from a field experiment. Rev. Public Personnel Admin. 40(4):589–612.Google Scholar
• Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadership Quart. 28(1):5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2014) Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. Day DV, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations. Oxford Library of Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York), 93–117.Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, d’Adda G, Weber RA, Zehnder C (2022) “Just words? Just speeches?” On the economic value of charismatic leadership. Management Sci. 68(9):6355–6381.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1997) Full Range Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Mindgarden, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Atwater L (1996) The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Appl. Psych. 45(1):5–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J. Appl. Psych. 88(2):207–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bender S, Bloom N, Card D, Van Reenen J, Wolter S (2018) Management practices, workforce selection, and productivity. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S371–S409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettinger E, Ludvigsen S, Rege M, Solli IF, Yeager D (2018) Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 146:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2019) The contingent effect of management practices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):721–749.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Foster L, Jarmin R, Patnaik M, Saporta-Eksten I, Van Reenen J (2019) What drives differences in management practices? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(5):1648–1683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruhn M, Karlan D, Schoar A (2018) The impact of consulting services on small and medium enterprises: Evidence from a randomized trial in Mexico. J. Political Econom. 126(2):635–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castro S, Englmaier F, Guadalupe M (2022) Fostering psychological safety in teams: Evidence from an RCT. Preprint, submitted July 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141538.Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar AG, Golub B, Yang H (2018) Signaling, shame, and silence in social learning. NBER Working Paper No. 25169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cooper DJ, Grossman Z (2020) Silence is golden: Team problem solving and communication costs. Experiment. Econom. 23(3):668–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu C, Dweck CS, Tong JY, Fu JH (1997) Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(5):923–940. Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Quidt J, Haushofer J, Roth C (2018) Measuring and bounding experimenter demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(11):3266–3302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deming DJ (2017) The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1593–1640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman N, Humphrey SE (2011) Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psych. 64(1):7–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolbier CL, Webster JA, McCalister KT, Mallon MW, Steinhardt MA (2005) Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. Amer. J. Health Promotion 19(3):194–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duckworth AL, Yeager DS (2015) Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Ed. Res. 44(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dvir T, Eden D, Avolio BJ, Shamir B (2002) Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Acad. Management J. 45(4):735–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck C (2006) Mindset (Robinson, London).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Carli LL (2003) The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quart. 14(6):807–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Grothe D, Schindler D, Schudy S (2021) The value of leadership: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. CESifo Working Paper No. 9273, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Cedefop (2020) European company survey 2019. Accessed March 27, 2024, https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/landing-page/european-company-survey-ecs-2019.Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Huffman D, Sunde U (2023) The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Management Sci. 69(4):1935–1950.Link, Google Scholar
• Fest S, Kvaløy O, Nieken P, Schöttner A (2021) How (not) to motivate online workers: Two controlled field experiments on leadership in the gig economy. Leadership Quart. 32(6):101514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer RG Jr (2014) Injecting charter school best practices into traditional public schools: Evidence from field experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1355–1407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosnell GK, List JA, Metcalfe RD (2020) The impact of management practices on employee productivity: A field experiment with airline captains. J. Political Econom. 128(4):1195–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green F (2010) Well-being, job satisfaction and labour mobility. Labour Econom. 17(6):897–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Pinto R (2015) Econometric mediation analyses: Identifying the sources of treatment effects from experimentally estimated production technologies with unmeasured and mismeasured inputs. Econometric Rev. 34(1–2):6–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Pinto R, Savelyev P (2013) Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2052–2086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinz M, Jeworrek S, Mertins V, Schumacher H, Sutter M (2020) Measuring the indirect effects of adverse employer behaviour on worker productivity: A field experiment. Econom. J. 130(632):2546–2568.Google Scholar
• Heslin PA, Vandewalle D, Latham GP (2006) Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psych. 59(4):871–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirak R, Peng AC, Carmeli A, Schaubroeck JM (2012) Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. Leadership Quart. 23(1):107–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman M, Tadelis S (2021) People management skills, employee attrition, and manager rewards: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. 129(1):243–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psych. Methods 15(4):309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobsen CB, Andersen LB, Bøllingtoft A, Tine LME (2022) Can leadership training improve organizational effectiveness? Evidence from a randomized field experiment on transformational and transactional leadership. Public Admin. Rev. 82(1):117–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones D, Molitor D, Reif J (2019) What do workplace wellness programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):1747–1791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):755–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge T, Thoresen C, Bono J, Patton G (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship. Psych. Bull. 127:376–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL, Stanton CT (2015) The value of bosses. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):823–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy H, Dierynck B, Anseel F, Simons T, Halbesleben JRB, McCaughey D, Savage GT, Sels L (2012) Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: A team-level study. J. Appl. Psych. 97(6):1273–1281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu J, Siu O-L, Shi K (2010) Transformational leadership and employee well-being: The mediating role of trust in the leader and self-efficacy. Appl. Psych. 59(3):454–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu S, Hu J, Li Y, Wang Z, Lin X (2014) Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: Evidence from China. Leadership Quart. 25(2):282–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manthei K, Sliwka D, Vogelsang T (2023) Talking about performance or paying for it? A field experiment on performance reviews and incentives. Management Sci. 69(4):2198–2216.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin R, Epitropaki O, O’Broin L (2017) Methodological issues in leadership training research: In pursuit of causality. Galavan RJ, Sund KJ, Hodgkinson GP, eds. Methodological Challenges and Advances in Managerial and Organizational Cognition, vol. 2 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin R, Hughes DJ, Epitropaki O, Thomas G (2020) In pursuit of causality in leadership training research: A review and pragmatic recommendations. Leadership Quart. 32(5):101375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meslec N, Curseu PL, Fodor OC, Kenda R (2020) Effects of charismatic leadership and rewards on individual performance. Leadership Quart. 31(6):101423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemanich LA, Vera D (2009) Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quart. 20(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N (2017) Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Rev. 27(3):521–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortega A, Van den Bossche P, Sánchez-Manzanares M, Rico R, Gil F (2014) The influence of change-oriented leadership and psychological safety on team learning in healthcare teams. J. Bus. Psych. 29(2):311–321.Google Scholar
• Rege M, Hanselman P, Solli I, Dweck C, Ludvigsen S, Bettinger E, Crosnoe R, et al. (2020) How can we inspire nations of learners? Investigating growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries. Amer. Psych. 76(5):755–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Management J. 53(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stantcheva S (2023) How to run surveys: A guide to creating your own identifying variation and revealing the invisible. Annual Rev. Econom. 15(1):205–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walumbwa FO, Schaubroeck J (2009) Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1275–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang G, Oh I-S, Courtright SH, Colbert AE (2011) Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group Organ. Management 36(2):223–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanous JP, Reichers AE, Hudy MJ (1997) Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? J. Appl. Psych. 82(2):247–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weidmann B, Deming DD (2021) Team layers: How social skills improve team performance. Econometrica 89(6):2637–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Hanselman P, Walton GM, Murray JS, Crosnoe R, Muller C, Tipton Eet al. (2019) A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature 573(7774):364–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Romero C, Paunesku D, Hulleman CS, Schneider B, Hinojosa C, Lee HY, et al. (2016) Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. J. Ed. Psych. 108(3):374–391.Crossref, Google Scholar