Implicit Incentives and Delegation in Teams

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02212

References

  • Adrian N, Möller M (2020) Self-managed work teams: An efficiency-rationale for pay compression. J. Econom. Management Strategy 29(2):315–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso R, Matouschek N (2008) Optimal delegation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(1):259–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arya A, Fellingham J, Glover J (1997) Teams, repeated tasks, and implicit incentives. J. Accounting Econom. 23(1):7–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Au PH (2020) Pay to quit and team incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 18(2):964–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1994) Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):1125–1156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1999) Informal authority in organizations. J. Law Econom. Organ. 15(1):56–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldenius T, Glover J, Xue H (2016) Relational contracts with and between agents. J. Accounting Econom. 61(2–3):369–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boning B, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) Opportunity counts: Teams and the effectiveness of production incentives. J. Labor Econom. 25(4):613–650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y-K, Yoo S-W (2001) Optimal incentives for teams. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):525–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dessein W (2002) Authority and communication in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(4):811–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas C, Gardner WL (2004) Transition to self-directed work teams: Implications of transition time and self-monitoring for managers’ use of influence tactics. J. Organ. Behav. 25(1):47–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flassak K, Hofmann C (2021) The effect of career concerns on team assignment. Working paper, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich.Google Scholar
  • Glover J, Kim E (2021) Optimal team composition: Diversity to foster implicit team incentives. Management Sci. 67(9):5800–5820.Google Scholar
  • Glover J, Kim E (2023) On the value of demographic diversity in teams. Working paper, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hermalin BE (1998) Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(5):1188–1206.Google Scholar
  • Hidir S, Migrow D (2021) Credibility, efficiency and the structure of authority. Working paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  • Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Management 33(6):987–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishihara A (2017) Relational contracting and endogenous formation of teamwork. RAND J. Econom. 48(2):335–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishihara A, Muramoto A (2022) Cooperation or collusion? Rents in relational contracts for teams. Working paper, University of Tokyo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  • Itoh H (1992) Cooperation in hierarchical organizations: An incentive perspective. J. Law Econom. Organ. 8(2):321–345.Google Scholar
  • Itoh H (1993) Coalitions, incentives, and risk sharing. J. Econom. Theory 60(2):410–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson SE (1996) The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. Handbook of Work Group Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 53–75.Google Scholar
  • Komai M, Stegeman M (2010) Leadership based on asymmetric information. RAND J. Econom. 41(1):35–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kräkel M (2017) Self-organizing teams. Econom. Lett. 159:195–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvaløy O, Olsen TE (2006) Team incentives in relational employment contracts. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):139–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvaløy O, Olsen TE (2019) Relational contracts, multiple agents, and correlated outputs. Management Sci. 65(11):5360–5370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2012) Leadership: A personnel economics approach. Labour Econom. 19(1):92–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Oyer P (2012) Personnel economics. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 479–519.Google Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Shaw KL (2007) Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspective 21(4):91–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magpili NC, Pazos P (2018) Self-managing team performance: A systematic review of multilevel input factors. Small Group Res. 49(1):3–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgeson FP, DeRue DS, Karam EP (2010) Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. J. Management 36(1):5–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajan RG, Wulf J (2006) The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):759–773.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi F, Teplitskiy M, Duede E, Evans JA (2019) The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nature Hum. Behav. 3(4):329–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Engelen JM, Kiewiet DJ, Terlouw P (2001) Improving performance of product development teams through managing polarity. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 31(1):46–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Knippenberg D, Mell JN (2016) Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 136:135–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas JM (2020) Repeated interaction in teams: Tenure and performance. Management Sci. 66(3):1496–1507.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.