Optimal Interventions for Increasing Healthy Food Consumption Among Low-Income Populations
Published Online:30 Sep 2025https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02324
References
- (2018) Healthy choices for every body adult curriculum improves participants’ food resource management skills and food safety practices. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 50(6):638–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64(1):52–66.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Sci. 65(1):32–49.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Food deserts and the causes of nutritional inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):1793–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) 5-a-day fruit and vegetable intervention improves consumption in a low income population. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 101(2):195–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Improving outcomes in child care subsidy voucher programs under regional asymmetries. Production Oper. Management 30(12):4435–4454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Electric vehicles with a battery switching station: Adoption and environmental impact. Management Sci. 61(4):772–794.Link, Google Scholar
- (1985) A meta-analysis of food- and nutrition-related research. J. Nutrition Ed. 17(2):51–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Policy optimization for personalized interventions in behavioral health. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 27(3):770–788.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Targeting labour market programmes—Results from a randomized experiment. Swiss J. Econom. Statist. 145(3):221–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Evaluating profiling as a means of allocating government services. Lechner M, Pfeiffer F, eds. Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies, ZEW Economic Studies, vol. 13 (Physica, Heidelberg, Germany).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Food subsidies and poverty alleviation. Econom. J. 98(392):701–719.Google Scholar
- (2008) How do socio-economic status, perceived economic barriers and nutritional benefits affect quality of dietary intake among us adults? Eur. J. Clinical Nutrition 62(3):303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Inferring welfare maximizing treatment assignment under budget constraints. J. Econometrics 167(1):168–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. J. Policy Anal. Management 24(1):73–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Consumer subsidies with a strategic supplier: Commitment vs. flexibility. Management Sci. 65(2):681–713.Link, Google Scholar
- City of Boston (2025a) Boston double up food bucks. Accessed March 3, 2025, https://www.boston.gov/departments/food-justice/boston-double-food-bucks.Google Scholar
- City of Boston (2025b) Healthy incentives program (HIP) program changes. Accessed March 3, 2025, https://www.boston.gov/news/healthy-incentives-program-hip-program-changes.Google Scholar
- (2015) The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Sci. 62(5):1235–1258.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) A mixed-methods evaluation of a snap-ed farmers’ market–Based nutrition education program. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 47(6):516–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Program evaluation as a decision problem. J. Econometrics 125(1–2):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption: Are coupons more effective than pure price discounts? Economic Research Report 96, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2009) Fruit and vegetable consumption by low income Americans: Would a price reduction make a difference? Economic Research Report 70, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2014) Do prices and attributes explain international differences in food purchases? Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(3):832–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
- DUFB New York (2025) How double up food bucks works: FAQ. Accessed March 3, 2025, https://doubleupnys.com/how-double-up-food-bucks-works/faq/.Google Scholar
- (2009) What matters (and what does not) in households’ decision to invest in malaria prevention? Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):224–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study. Psych. Sci. 21(3):406–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Helping the poor through housing subsidies: Lessons from Chile, Colombia and South Africa. Habitat Internat. 28(1):13–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) participation leads to modest changes in diet quality. Economic Research Report 147, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2015) Nudging consumers toward better food choices: Policy approaches to changing food consumption behaviors. Psych. Marketing 32(5):501–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Asymptotics for statistical treatment rules. Econometrica 77(5):1683–1701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Disparities in state-specific adult fruit and vegetable consumption—United States, 2015. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 66(45):1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 96(5):977–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) On the effectiveness of uniform subsidies in increasing market consumption. Management Sci. 63(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Measuring the effect of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation on food security. Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
- (2004) Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations. Econometrica 72(4):1221–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Estimated global, regional, and national cardiovascular disease burdens related to fruit and vegetable consumption: An analysis from the global dietary database (FS01-01-19). Current Developments Nutrition 3(Suppl 1):nzz034.FS01-01-19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives and disincentives for improving food purchases and health through the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): A microsimulation study. PLoS Medicine 15(10):e1002661.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Factors influencing efficacy of nutrition education interventions: A systematic review. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 49(2):142–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Financial incentives increase fruit and vegetable intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: A randomized controlled trial of the USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 104(2):423–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Technical Report 4872-11, MIT Sloan, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2015) Strategies to increase the ownership and use of insecticide-treated bednets to prevent malaria. Campbell Systematic Rev. 11(1):1–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using government rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 62(1):65–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Effect of supplemental nutrition assistance program: Education (snap-ed) on food security and dietary outcomes. Nutrition Rev. 77(12):903–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 68:183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. British J. Nutrition 111(10):1713–1726.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Consumer food choices: The role of price and pricing strategies. Public Health Nutrition 14(12):2220–2226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Donor product-subsidies to increase consumption: Implications of consumer awareness and profit-maximizing intermediaries. Production Oper. Management 28(7):1757–1772.Crossref, Google Scholar
- USDA, Food and Nutrition Service (2025) Supplemental nutrition assistance program participation and cost. Accessed September 17, 2025, https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resource-files/snap-annualsummary-8.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2022) Changes in SNAP benefit levels and food spending and diet quality: Simulations from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (May 12), http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep41228.Google Scholar
- (2000) Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite 34(3):269–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Price discounts significantly enhance fruit and vegetable purchases when combined with nutrition education: A randomized controlled supermarket trial. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 97(4):886–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) SNAP-Based incentive programs at farmers’ markets: Adaptation considerations for temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) recipients. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 49(9):743–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Wholesome Wave (2020) 2020 impact report. Accessed September 17, 2025, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5febb5b1df316630764c4dec/t/6092e37afa6855094c38a3b8/1620239238740/WholesomeWave2020ImpactReport(10).pdf.Google Scholar
- (2021) Consolidating evidence on the effectiveness of interventions promoting fruit and vegetable consumption: An umbrella review. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 18(1):11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs: Subsidizing consumers or manufacturers? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):752–766.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Trade-in remanufacturing, customer purchasing behavior, and government policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):601–616.Link, Google Scholar

