Algorithm Aversion: Evidence from Ridesharing Drivers
References
- (2021) AI adoption and system-wide change. NBER Working Paper No. 28811, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2022) Survey on the objectives of recommender system: Measures, solutions, evaluation methodology, and new perspectives. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(5):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: The countervailing forces of ability and aversion. Organ. Sci. 33(1):149–169.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Artificial intelligence technologies and aggregate growth prospects. Diamond JW, Zodrow GR, eds. Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 132–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Does machine translation affect international trade? Evidence from a large digital platform. Management Sci. 65(12):5449–5460.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. J. Behav. Decis. Making. 33(2):220–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence. Nat. Human Behav. 5(12):1636–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The impact of forced intervention on AI adoption. Preprint, submitted September 16, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640862.Google Scholar
- (2019) Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (ACM, New York), 241–242.Google Scholar
- (2019) Economics, fairness and algorithmic bias. Preprint, submitted April 4, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3361280.Google Scholar
- (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) People reject algorithms in uncertain decision domains because they have diminishing sensitivity to forecasting error. Psychol. Sci. 31(10):1302–1314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Does human-algorithm feedback loop lead to error propagation? Evidence from Zillow’s Zestimate. NBER Working Paper No. 29880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2021) Do as AI say: Susceptibility in deployment of clinical decision-aids. NPJ Digit. Med. 4(1):31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Learning by driving: Productivity improvements by New York City taxi drivers. Am. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(1):70–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Zero to one: Sales prospecting with augmented recommendation. Preprint, submitted January 14, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4006841.Google Scholar
- (2021) Real-world ride-hailing vehicle repositioning using deep reinforcement learning. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 130:103289.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Why are we averse toward algorithms? A comprehensive literature review on algorithm aversion. Proc. 28th European Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta), 4171–4186.Google Scholar
- (2021) When will workers follow an algorithm? A field experiment with a retail business. Management Sci. 67(3):1670–1695.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Human decisions and machine predictions. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):237–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The geography of ridesharing: A case study on New York City. Inf. Econom. Policy 57:100941.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Can big data protect a firm from competition? Preprint, submitted December 22, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2705530.Google Scholar
- (2019) How do recommender systems affect sales diversity? A cross-category investigation via randomized field experiment. Inform. Syst. Res. 30(1):239–259.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):831–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Do digital platforms reduce moral hazard? The case of Uber and taxis. Management Sci. 67(8):4665–4685.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Artificial intelligence coaches for sales agents: Caveats and solutions. J. Marketing 85(2):14–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (1991) The impact of experience on the design of user interface. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 34(5):731–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes. J. Consum. Psychol. 33(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Mobile hailing technology and taxi driving behaviors. Marketing Sci. 38(5):734–755.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) The effects of experience and a decision aid on the slope, scatter, and bias of earnings forecasts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 66(1):111–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Algorithmic outputs as information source: The effects of Zestimates on home prices and racial bias in the housing market. Preprint, submitted May 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3584896.Google Scholar
- (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) The unintended consequences of raising awareness: Knowing about the existence of algorithmic racial bias widens racial inequality. Preprint, submitted October 23, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3921691.Google Scholar

