An Equivalence Between Fair Division and Wagering Mechanisms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02615

References

  • Amanatidis G, Birmpas G, Christodoulou G, Markakis E (2017) Truthful allocation mechanisms without payments: Characterization and implications on fairness. Babaioff M, Moulin H, Daskalakis C, eds. Proc. 18th ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 545–562.Google Scholar
  • Amanatidis G, Birmpas G, Filos-Ratsikas A, Voudouris AA (2022) Fair division of indivisible goods: A survey. Raedt LD, ed. Proc. 31st Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI, San Francisco), 5385–5393.Google Scholar
  • Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22(3):265–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ, Intriligator MD, eds. (1982) Handbook of Mathematical Economics (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Aziz H, Ye C (2014) Cake cutting algorithms for piecewise constant and piecewise uniform valuations. Liu T-Y, Qi Q, Ye Y, eds. Proc. 10th Conf. on Web and Internet Econom. (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 1–14.Google Scholar
  • Aziz H, Brandt F, Brill M (2013) The computational complexity of random serial dictatorship. Econom. Lett. 121(3):341–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bei X, Huzhang G, Suksompong W (2020) Truthful fair division without free disposal. Soc. Choice Welfare 55(3):523–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2012) On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Sci. 58(12):2234–2250.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brams SJ, Taylor AD (1996) Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD (2016) Handbook of Computational Social Choice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brânzei S, Miltersen PB (2015) A dictatorship theorem for cake cutting. Yang Q, Wooldridge M, eds. Proc. 24th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 482–488.Google Scholar
  • Brânzei S, Gkatzelis V, Mehta R (2022) Nash social welfare approximation for strategic agents. Oper. Res. 70(1):402–415.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brier GW (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. 78(1):1–3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caragiannis I, Kaklamanis C, Kanellopoulos P, Kyropoulou M (2009) On low-envy truthful allocations. Rossi F, Tsoukias A, eds. Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. on Algorithmic Decision Theory (Springer, Berlin), 111–119.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Liu Y, Wang J (2019) Randomized wagering mechanisms. Hentenryck PV, Zhou Z-H, eds. Proc. 33rd AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 1845–1852.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Lai JK, Parkes DC, Procaccia AD (2013) Truth, justice, and cake cutting. Games Econom. Behav. 77:284–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Devanur NR, Pennock DM, Vaughan JW (2014) Removing arbitrage from wagering mechanisms. Conitzer V, Easley D, Babaioff M, eds. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 377–394.Google Scholar
  • Cheung YK (2016) Better strategyproof mechanisms without payments or prior – An analytic approach. Kambhampati S, ed. Proc. 25th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 194–200.Google Scholar
  • Chevaleyre Y, Dunne PE, Endriss U, Lang J, Lemaître M, Maudet N, et al. (2006) Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica (Vilnius) 30:3–31.Google Scholar
  • Cole R, Gkatzelis V, Goel G (2013a) Mechanism design for fair division. McAfee P, Tardos É, eds. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 251–268.Google Scholar
  • Cole R, Gkatzelis V, Goel G (2013b) Positive results for mechanism design without money. Ito T, Jonker C, Gini M, Shehory O, eds. Proc. 12th Internat. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS, Richland, SC), 1165–1166.Google Scholar
  • Cole R, Gkatzelis V, Goel G (2022) Mechanism design for fair division. Working paper, Drexel University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Deng X, Qi Q, Saberi A (2012) Algorithmic solutions for envy-free cake cutting. Oper. Res. 60(6):1461–1476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg E, Gale D (1959) Consensus of subjective probabilities: The pari-mutuel method. Ann. Math. Statist. 30(1):165–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foley D (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econom. Essays 7:45–98.Google Scholar
  • Freeman R, Pennock DM, Vaughan JW (2017) The double clinching auction for wagering. Babaioff M, Moulin H, Daskalakis C, eds. Proc. 18th ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 43–60.Google Scholar
  • Freeman R, Pennock DM, Vaughan JW (2019) An equivalence between wagering and fair-division mechanisms. Hentenryck PV, Zhou Z-H, eds. Proc. 33rd AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 1957–1964.Google Scholar
  • Frongillo RM, Kash IA (2021) General truthfulness characterizations via convex analysis. Games Econom. Behav. 130:636–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneiting T, Raftery AE (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477):359–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Good IJ (1952) Rational decisions. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 14:107–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo M, Conitzer V (2010) Strategy-proof allocation of multiple items between two agents without payments or priors. Hoek Wvd, Kaminka GA, Lespérance Y, Luck M, Sen S, eds. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (IFAAMAS, Richland, SC), 881–888.Google Scholar
  • Han L, Su C, Tang L, Zhang H (2011) On strategy-proof allocation without payments or priors. Chen N, Elkins E, Koutsoupias E, eds. Proc. 7th Conf. on Web and Internet Econom. (Springer, Berlin), 182–193.Google Scholar
  • Hanson R (2003) Combinatorial information market design. Inform. Systems Frontiers 5(1):107–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jose VR (2009) A characterization for the spherical scoring rule. Theory Decision 66(3):263–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilgour DM, Gerchak Y (2004) Elicitation of probabilities using competitive scoring rules. Decision Analysis 1(2):108–113.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert N, Langford J, Wortman J, Chen Y, Reeves D, Shoham Y, Pennock DM (2008) Self-financed wagering mechanisms for forecasting. Sandholm T, Riedl J, Fortnow L, eds. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 170–179.Google Scholar
  • Lambert NS, Langford J, Vaughan JW, Chen Y, Reeves DM, Shoham Y, Pennock DM (2015) An axiomatic characterization of wagering mechanisms. J. Econom. Theory 156:389–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maya A, Nisan N (2012) Incentive compatible two player cake cutting. Goldberg PW, ed. Proc. 8th Conf. on Web and Internet Econom. (Springer, Berlin), 170–183.Google Scholar
  • Menon V, Larson K (2017) Deterministic, strategyproof, and fair cake cutting. Sierra C, ed. Proc. 26th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI, San Francisco), 352–358.Google Scholar
  • Mossel E, Tamuz O (2010) Truthful fair division. Kontogiannis S, Koutsoupias E, Spirakis PG, eds. Proc. 3rd Internat. Sympos. on Algorithmic Game Theory (Springer, Berlin), 288–299.Google Scholar
  • Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Procaccia AD (2013) Cake cutting: Not just child’s play. Comm. ACM 56(7):78–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson JM, Webb WA (1998) Cake Cutting Algorithms: Be Fair If You Can (A. K. Peters, Natick, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roby TB (1965) Belief states and the uses of evidence. Behav. Sci. 10(3):255–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage LJ (1971) Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66:783–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schummer J (1996) Strategy-proofness vs. efficiency on restricted domains of exchange economies. Soc. Choice Welfare 14(1):47–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinhaus H (1948) The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16:101–104.Google Scholar
  • Tao B (2022) On existence of truthful fair cake cutting mechanisms. Segal I, Seuken S, Pennock DM, eds. Proc. 23rd ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 404–434.Google Scholar
  • Varian HR (1974) Equity, envy and efficiency. J. Econom. Theory 9:63–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.