Optimal Match Recommendations in Two-sided Marketplaces with Endogenous Prices

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Che YK, Yasuda Y (2015) Expanding “choice” in school choice. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 7(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Sohoni MG, Bandi C (2022) Parameterized approximations for the two-sided assortment optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. 50(4):399–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anunrojwong J, Iyer K, Manshadi V (2023) Information design for congested social services: Optimal need-based persuasion. Management Sci. 69(7):3778–3796.Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Saban D (2023) Online assortment optimization for two-sided matching platforms. Management Sci. 69(4):2069–2087.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y (2021) Managing congestion in decentralized matching markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):620–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Monachou F, Nikzad A (2024) Optimal allocation via waitlists: Simplicity through information design. Rev. Econom. Stud., rdae013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Braverman M, Kanoria Y, Shi P (2020) Clearing matching markets efficiently: Informative signals and match recommendations. Management Sci. 66(5):2163–2193.Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Krishnaswamy AK, Makhijani R, Saban D, Shiragur K (2022) Assortment planning for two-sided sequential matching markets. Oper. Res. 70(5):2784–2803.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas D, Nedić A, Ozdaglar A (2003) Convex Analysis and Optimization (Athena Scientific, Nashua, NH).Google Scholar
• Coles P, Kushnir A, Niederle M (2013) Preference signaling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 5(2):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles P, Cawley J, Levine PB, Niederle M, Roth AE, Siegfried JJ (2010) The job market for new economists: A market design perspective. J. Econom. Perspective 24(4):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fradkin A (2017) Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: Evidence from Airbnb. Working paper, Boston University.Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yildirim P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2017) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2019) Buyer uncertainty about seller capacity: Causes, consequences, and a partial solution. Management Sci. 65(8):3518–3540.Google Scholar
• Immorlica N, Lucier B, Manshadi V, Wei A (2022) Designing approximately optimal search on matching platforms. Management Sci. 69(8):4363–4971.Google Scholar
• Jagadeesan M, Wei A (2018) Varying the number of signals in matching markets. Christodoulou G, Harks T, eds. Web and Internet Economics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 232–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms: Restricting agent actions. Management Sci. 67(10):5990–6029.Google Scholar
• Kranton RE, Minehart DF (2000) Competition for goods in buyer-seller networks. Rev. Econom. Design 5:301–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kranton RE, Minehart DF (2001) A theory of buyer-seller networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):485–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Niederle M (2015) Propose with a rose? Signaling in Internet dating markets. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):731–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Netessine S (2019) Higher market thickness reduces matching rate in online platforms: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Management Sci. 66(1):217–289.Google Scholar
• Liu Q, van Ryzin G (2008) On the choice-based linear programming model for network revenue management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(2):288–310.Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV (2007) Algorithmic Game Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios I, Saban D, Zheng F (2023) Improving match rates in dating markets through assortment optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1304–1323.Link, Google Scholar
• Romanyuk G, Smolin A (2019) Cream skimming and information design in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 11(2):250–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sotomayor O (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shen ZJM, Shmoys DB (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapley LS, Shubik M (1971) The assignment game I: The core. Internat. J. Game Theory 1(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi P (2022) Optimal priority-based allocation mechanisms. Management Sci. 68(1):171–188.Google Scholar
• Shi P (2023) Optimal matchmaking strategy in two-sided marketplaces. Management Sci. 69(3):1323–1340.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi P (2024) The welfare effects of selling leads in a two-sided marketplace. Preprint, submitted August 22, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4727198.Google Scholar
• Shi L, Zhang K (2019) Your preference or mine? A randomized field experiment on recommender systems in two-sided matching markets. Proc. 40th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association of Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Stout H (2015) Amazon, Google and more are drawn to home services market. New York Times (April 12), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/13/technology/amazon-google-and-more-are-drawn-to-home-services-market.html.Google Scholar
• Su Y, Bayoumi M, Joachims T (2022) Optimizing rankings for recommendation in matching markets. Proc. ACM Web Conf. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 328–338.Google Scholar
• Torrico A, Carvalho M, Lodi A (2020) Multi-agent assortment optimization in sequential matching markets. Preprint, submitted June 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04313.Google Scholar
• Tu K, Ribeiro B, Jensen D, Towsley D, Liu B, Jiang H, Wang X (2014) Online dating recommendations: Matching markets and learning preferences. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 787–792.Google Scholar