Simple and (Approximately) Optimal Mechanism in Efficiency and Equality Tradeoff

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02785

References

  • Argyris N, Karsu Ö, Yavuz M (2022) Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 297(2):560–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asada Y (2005) Assessment of the health of americans: The average health-related quality of life and its inequality across individuals and groups. Population Health Metrics 3(1):7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu S, DasGupta A (1997) The mean, median, and mode of unimodal distributions: A characterization. Theory Probability Appl. 41(2):210–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2012) On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Sci. 58(12):2234–2250.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Condorelli D (2012) What money can’t buy: Efficient mechanism design with costly signals. Games Econom. Behav. 75(2):613–624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Condorelli D (2013) Market and non-market mechanisms for the optimal allocation of scarce resources. Games Econom. Behav. 82:582–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corrado G (1936) On the measure of concentration with special reference to income and wealth. Sisam CH, ed. Proc. Commission Res. Conf. Econom. Statist., General Series No. 208; Study Series No. 21 (Colorado College Publication, Colorado Springs, CO), 73–79.Google Scholar
  • Dharmadhikari S, Joag-Dev K (1988) Unimodality, Convexity, and Applications (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
  • Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Rutten F (1992) Equity in the Finance and Delivery of Health Care: An International Perspective (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckhoff T (1989) Lotteries in allocative situations. Soc. Sci. Inform. 28(1):5–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans MF, Vossler CA, Flores NE (2009) Hybrid allocation mechanisms for publicly provided goods. J. Public Econom. 93(1):311–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fauziana H, Wardhana AK, Rusgianto S (2022) The effect of education, income, unemployment, and poverty toward the gini ratio in member of oic countries. Daengku J. Humanities Soc. Sci. Innovation 2(2):181–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fienberg SE (1971) Randomization and social affairs: The 1970 draft lottery. Science (1979) 171(3968):255–261.Google Scholar
  • Guo M, Wang Z, Sakurai Y (2022) Gini index based initial coin offering mechanism. Autonomic Agent Multiagent Systems 36(1):20.Google Scholar
  • Gutjahr WJ (2023) Fair and efficient vaccine allocation: A generalized gini index approach. Production Oper. Management 32(12):4114–4134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn R (2009) The ethical rational of business for the poor: Integrating the concepts bottom of the pyramid, sustainable development, and corporate citizenship. J. Bus. Ethics 84(3):313–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hailemariam A, Dzhumashev R, Shahbaz M (2020) Carbon emissions, income inequality and economic development. Empirical Econom. 59(3):1139–1159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heil MT, Wodon QT (2000) Future inequality in CO2 emissions and the impact of abatement proposals. Environ. Resource Econom. 17(2):163–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y, Wen Q (2019) Auction–lottery hybrid mechanisms: Structural model and empirical analysis. Internat. Econom. Rev. (Philadelphia) 60(1):355–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knell M, Stix H (2020) Perceptions of inequality. Eur. J. Political Econom. 65(5):101927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lejeune M, Turner J (2019) Planning online advertising using gini jndices. Oper. Res. 67(5):1222–1245.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mandell MB (1991) Modelling effectiveness-equity trade-offs in public service delivery systems. Management Sci. 37(4):467–482.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Masyita D, Ahmed H (2013) Why is growth of islamic microfinance lower than its conventional counterparts in indonesia. Islamic Econom. Stud. 21(1):35–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Millimet DL, Slottje D (2002) Environmental compliance costs and the distribution of emissions in the US. J. Regulatory Sci. 42(1):87–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naeem S (2009) Ecology: Gini in the bottle. Nature 458(7238):579–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norman-Major K (2011) Balancing the four es; or can we achieve equity for social equity in public administration? J. Public Affairs Ed. 17(2):233–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ogryczak W (2000) Inequality measures and equitable approaches to location problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122(2):374–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohsawa Y, Ozaki N, Plastria F (2008) Equity-efficiency bicriteria location with squared euclidean distances. Oper. Res. 56(1):79–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Okun AM (2015) Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perugia A, Moccia L, Cordeau JF, Laporte G (2011) Designing a home-to-work bus service in a metropolitan area. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 45(10):1710–1726.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prahalad CK, Prahalad CK, Fruehauf HC, Prahalad K (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid (Wharton School Publisher, Pennsylvania).Google Scholar
  • Rong J, Sun N, Wang D (2019) A new evaluation criterion for allocation mechanisms with application to vehicle license allocations in China. J. Mechanism Institution Design 4(1):39–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Runnenburg JT (1978) Mean, median, mode. Statist. Neerlandica 32(2):73–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan JM (2003) Decision support for allocating scarce drugs. Interfaces (Providence) 33(2):1–11.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas V, Wang Y, Fan X (2001) Measuring Education Inequality: Gini Coefficients of Education, vol. 2525 (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Zanden JL, Baten J, Foldvari P, Van Leeuwen B (2014) The changing shape of global inequality 1820–2000: Exploring a new dataset. Rev. Income Wealth 60(2):279–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittebolle L, Marzorati M, Clement L, Balloi A, Daffonchio D, Heylen K, De Vos P, et al. (2009) Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature 458(7238):623–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zwet W (1979) Mean, median, mode II. Statist. Neerlandica 33(1):1–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.