Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity and Decreased Stability in Intraorganizational Communication Networks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

References

• Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 14(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abraham M (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldecoa R, Marín I (2011) Deciphering network community structure by surprise. PLoS One 6(9):e24195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alekseev G, Amer S, Gopal M, Kuchler T, Schneider JW, Stroebel J, Wernerfelt NC (2023) The effects of COVID-19 on US small businesses: Evidence from owners, managers, and employees. Management Sci. 69(1):7–24.Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):238–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bickel PJ, Chen A (2009) A nonparametric view of network models and Newman–Girvan and other modularities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(5):21068–21073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1963) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Lemos R, Sadun R, Scur D, Reenen J (2014) JEEA-FBBVA lecture 2013. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):835–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brucks MS, Levav J (2022) Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature 605(7908):108–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) Mechanistic and organic systems. Classics Organ. Theory 10(2):209–214.Google Scholar
• Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byron K (2008) Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury PR, Foroughi C, Larson B (2021) Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management J. 42(4):655–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. The Management of Innovation and Change Series (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E Statist. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Related Interdisciplinary Topics 70(6):066111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement J, Shipilov A, Galunic C (2018) Brokerage as a public good: The externalities of network hubs for different formal roles in creative organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):251–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Wiginton JC (1979) Language and organization. Acad. Management Rev. 4(2):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, McFarland DA (2013) Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):69–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton M (1959) Men who manage. Granovetter M, Swedberg R, eds. The Sociology of Economic Life, chapter 16 (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Davis A, Gardner BB, Gardner MR (1941) Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• DeFilippis E, Impink SM, Singell M, Polzer JT, Sadun R (2022) The impact of COVID-19 on digital communication patterns. Humanities Soc. Sci. Comm. 9(1):180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edge D, Larson J, Trandev N, Parikh Shah N, Buractaon C, Caurvina N, Evans N, White CM (2020) Workgroup mapping: Visual analysis of collaboration culture. Preprint, submitted May 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.00402.Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Park KF (2018) Incumbent adaptation to technological change: The past, present, and future of research on heterogeneous incumbent response. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):357–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortunato S (2010) Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486(3–5):75–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortunato S, Newman MEJ (2022) 20 years of network community detection. Nature Phys. 18(8):848–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ (2021) The impact of the Covid‐19 pandemic on firms’ organizational designs. J. Management Stud. 58(1):270–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1524–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs M, Mengel F, Siemroth C (2021) Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel & analytics data on IT professionals. BFI Working paper, University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Girvan M, Newman ME (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(12):7821–7826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green A, Shalizi CR (2022) Bootstrapping exchangeable random graphs. Electronic J. Statistics 16(1):1058–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Sytch M, Tatarynowicz A (2012) The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure. Organ. Sci. 23(2):449–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland PW, Laskey KB, Leinhardt S (1983) Stochastic blockmodels: First steps. Soc. Networks 5(2):109–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubert L, Arabie P (1985) Comparing partitions. J. Classification 2(1):193–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs AZ, Watts DJ (2021) A large-scale comparative study of informal social networks in firms. Management Sci. 67(9):5489–5509.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobsen DH, Stea D, Soda G (2022) Intra-organizational network dynamics: Past progress, current challenges, and new frontiers. Acad. Management Ann. 16(2):853–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL (2000) The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407(6804):651–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz N, Lazer D, Arrow H, Contractor N (2004) Network theory and small groups. Small Group Res. 35(3):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kernighan BW, Lin S (1970) An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell Systems Tech. J. 49(2):291–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerrissey MJ, Satterstrom P, Edmondson AC (2020) Into the fray: Adaptive approaches to studying novel teamwork forms. Organ. Psych. Rev. 10(2):62–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleczkowski A, Grenfell BT (1999) Mean-field-type equations for spread of epidemics: The “small world” model. Physica A Statist. Mech. Its Appl. 274(1–2):355–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Edmondson AC (2017) Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lengel RH, Daft RL (1984) An exploratory analysis of the relationship between media richness and managerial information processing. Report, Department of Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Frey CB, Wu L (2023) Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. Nature 623(7989):987–991.Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Agarwal R (2004) Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):975–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore C, Newman MEJ (2000) Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. Phys. Rev. E Statist. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Related Interdisciplinary Topics 61(5):5678–5682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(23):8577–8582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E Statist. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Related Interdisciplinary Topics 69(2):026113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC, McDonald R, Wang D, Hallen B (2015) Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1334–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Awate S (2017) Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra‐organizational inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 38(3):657–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Kleinbaum AM (2011) Matter over mind? Email data and the measurement of social networks. Connections 31(1):22–46.Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R (2019) Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss mechanical watchmaking, 1970–2008. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):576–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawlings CM, McFarland DA, Dahlander L, Wang D (2015) Streams of thought: Knowledge flows and intellectual cohesion in a multidisciplinary era. Soc. Forces 93(4):1687–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA, Opie R (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, vol. XLVI (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sloan AP (1964) My Years with General Motors Garden City (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Soda G, Mannucci PV, Burt R (2021) Networks, creativity, and time: Staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation. Acad. Management J. 64(4):1164–1190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Tortoriello M, Iorio A (2015) It is how you broker: Behavioral orientation, structural holes and individual performance. Acad. Management Proc. 2015(1):17140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss G (2018) Group dynamics and intergroup relations. Granovetter M, Swedberg R, eds. The Sociology of Human Life, chapter 15 (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sytch M, Tatarynowicz A (2014) Exploring the locus of invention: The dynamics of network communities and firms’ invention productivity. Acad. Management J. 57(1):249–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tatarynowicz A, Sytch M, Gulati R (2016) Environmental demands and the emergence of social structure: Technological dynamism and interorganizational network forms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):52–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teodorovicz T, Sadun R, Kun AL, Shaer O (2022) How does working from home during COVID-19 affect what managers do? Evidence from time-Use studies. Human–Computer Interaction 37(6):532–557.Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Traag V, Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2019) From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Rep. 9(1):5233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(special issue):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson AC (2015) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA (2019) Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744):378–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L, Holtz D, Jaffe S, Suri S, Sinha S, Weston J, Joyce C, et al. (2022) The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nat. Human Behav. 6(1):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar