Network Externalities and Market Dominance

References

• Akerlof R, Holden R (2019) Capital assembly. J. Law Econom. Organ. 35(3):489–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambrus A, Argenziano R (2009) Asymmetric networks in two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 1(1):17–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argenziano R, Gilboa I (2012) History as a coordination device. Theory Decision 73(4):501–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Polit. Econom. 99(5):1109–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beknazar-Yuzbashev G, Durán RJ, McCrosky J, Stalinski M (2022) Toxic content and user engagement on social media: Evidence from a field experiment. Preprint, submitted December 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4307346.Google Scholar
• Biglaiser G, Crémer J (2020) The value of incumbency when platforms face heterogeneous customers. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 12(4):229–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corsetti G, Dasgupta A, Morris S, Shin HS (2004) Does one Soros make a difference? A theory of currency crises with large and small traders. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(1):87–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP (2003) Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and boundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2007) Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica 75(6):1721–1770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Costa-Gomes MA, Iriberri N (2013) Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. J. Econom. Lit. 51(1):5–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2021) Killer acquisitions. J. Polit. Econom. 129(3):649–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B (2015) Does Google leverage market power through tying and bundling? J. Competition Law Econom. 11(2):365–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B (2017) Uber can’t be fixed—It’s time for regulators to shut it down. Harvard Business Review Digital (June 21), https://hbr.org/2017/06/uber-cant-be-fixed-its-time-for-regulators-to-shut-it-down.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Geradin D (2016) Spontaneous deregulation: How to compete with platforms that ignore the rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(4):80–87.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Holden R (2022) Interoperability (Mimeo, UNSW Business School, Sydney, Australia).Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR (2008) Managing proprietary and shared platforms. Calif. Management Rev. 50(4):31–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1967–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):361–366.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Pricing a network good to deter entry. J. Indust. Econom. 48(4):373–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu D, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Newbery DMG (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):514–526.Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Lerner J (2004) The Venture Capital Cycle (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Yehezkel Y (2016) The role of coordination bias in platform competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 25(2):274–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Yehezkel Y (2019) Focality advantage in platform competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):49–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jullien B, Yehezkel Y (2020) Dynamic competition with network externalities: How history matters. RAND J. Econom. 51(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Camerer C, Weigel K (1998) Iterated dominance and iterated best response in experimental “p-beauty contests”. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):947–969.Google Scholar
• Jullien B (2011) Competition in multi-sided markets: Divide and conquer. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(4):186–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Kets W, Sandroni A (2021) A theory of strategic uncertainty and cultural diversity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(1):287–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan LM (2017) Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law J. 126:710–805.Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1987) Markets with consumer switching costs. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(4):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovacic WE, Shapiro C (2000) Antitrust policy: A century of economic and legal thinking. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(1):43–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markovich S, Yehezkel Y (2022) Group hug: Platform competition with user-groups. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 14(2):139–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel R (1995) Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1313–1326.Google Scholar
• Peek JBH, Sinjou JP, Carasso MG, Heemskerk JPJ, Schouhamer Immink KA, Hoeve H, Timmermans J, et al. (2009) The CD system as standardized by Philips and Sony. Peek H, Bergmans J, van Haaren J, Toolenaar F, Stan S, eds. Origins and Successors of the Compact Disc: Contributions of Philips to Optical Storage, Philips Research Book Series, vol. 11 (Springer Dordrecht, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 53–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Wilson PW (1994) Experimental evidence on players’ models of other players. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 25(3):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Weizsäcker CC (1984) The costs of substitution. Econometrica 52(5):1085–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2019) Why some platforms thrive and others don’t. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January-February), https://hbr.org/2019/01/why-some-platforms-thrive-and-others-dont.Google Scholar