Information Search Within a Web Page: Modeling the Full Sequence of Eye Movement Decisions, Subjective Value Updating, and First Clicks

References

• Adam K (2001) Learning while searching for the best alternative. J. Econometrics 101(1):252–281.Google Scholar
• Branco F , Sun M , Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown M , Flinn CJ , Schotter A (2011) Real-time search in the laboratory and the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):948–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busemeyer JR , Myung IJ (1992) An adaptive approach to human decision making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance. J. Experiment. Psych. General 121(2):177–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busemeyer JR , Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psych. Rev. 100(3):432–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway F , Rangel A , Griffiths TL (2021) Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling. PLoS Comput. Biology 17(3):e1008863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A , Dean M , Martin D (2011) Search and satisficing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):2899–2922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandon P , Hutchinson JW , Bradlow ET , Young SH (2007) Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action (Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Chandon P , Hutchinson JW , Bradlow ET , Young SH (2009) Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J. Marketing 73(6):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y , Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.Link, Google Scholar
• Chick SE , Frazier P (2012) Sequential sampling with economics of selection procedures. Management Sci. 58(3):550–569.Link, Google Scholar
• Colas JT , Lu J (2017) Learning where to look for high value improves decision making asymmetrically. Frontiers Psych. 8:2000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbetta M , Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurology 3(3):201–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellaert BGC , Häubl G (2012) Searching in choice mode: Consumer decision processes in product search with recommendations. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):277–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De los Santos B , Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.Link, Google Scholar
• Dickson PR , Sawyer AG (1990) The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing 54(3):52–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl K , Zauberman G (2005) Searching ordered sets: Evaluations from sequences under search. J. Consumer Res. 31(4):824–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ditterich J (2006) Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology. Neural Networks 19(8):981–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T , Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Ernst MO , Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G (2017) An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice. Cognition 168:34–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D , Strack P , Strzalecki T (2018) Speed, accuracy, and the optimal timing of choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(12):3651–3684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X , Laibson D , Moloche G , Weinberg S (2006) Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1043–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A , Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. 7(4):457–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A , Meng X-L , Stern H (1996) Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statist. Sinica 6(1996):733–807.Google Scholar
• Gelman A , Carlin JB , Stern HS , Dunson DB , Vehtari A , Rubin DB (2014) Bayesian Data Analysis , 3rd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G , Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häubl G , Trifts T (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR , Urban GL , Liberali G , Braun M (2009) Website morphing. Marketing Sci. 28(2):202–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Hawkins GE , Wagenmakers EJ , Ratcliff R , Brown SD (2015) Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making. J. Neurophysiology 114:40–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holbrook MB , Hirschman EC (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):132–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K , Nyström M , Andersson R , Dewhurst R , Jarodzka H , Van de Weijer J (2011) Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Honka E , Chintagunta P (2016) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the US auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang Y , Hutchinson JW (2008) Counting every thought: Implicit measures of cognitive responses to advertising. J. Consumer Res. 35(1):98–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y , Hutchinson JW (2013) The roles of planning, learning, and mental models in repeated dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(2):163–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui S , Bradlow ET , Fader PS (2009) Testing behavioral hypotheses using an integrated model of grocery store shopping path and purchase behavior. J. Consumer Res. 36(3):478–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JW , Raman K , Mantrala MK (1994) Finding choice alternatives in memory: Probability models of brand name recall. J. Marketing Res. 31(4):441–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jang A , Sharma R , Drugowitsch J (2021) Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior. eLife 10:e63436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J , Albuquerque P , Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.Link, Google Scholar
• Konovalov A , Krajbich I (2016) Gaze data reveal distinct choice processing underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. Nature Comm. 7(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koulayev S (2014) Search for differentiated products: Identification and estimation. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):553–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I , Armel C , Rangel A (2010) Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience 13(10):1292–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liechty J , Pieters R , Wedel M (2003) Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a Bayesian hidden Markov model. Psychometrika 68(4):519–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA , McCardle KF (1991) Uncertain search: A model of search among technologies of uncertain values. Management Sci. 37(11):1474–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Lohse GL , Johnson EJ (1996) A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 68(1):28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luan S , Schooler LJ , Gigerenzer G (2011) A signal-detection analysis of fast-and-frugal trees. Psych. Rev. 118(2):316–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Martinovici A , Pieters R , Erdem T (2023) Attention trajectories capture utility accumulation and predict brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 60(4):625–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCall JJ (1970) Economics of information and job search. Quart. J. Econom. 84(1):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1986) The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Sci. 5(4):275–297.Link, Google Scholar
• Otter T , Allenby GM , Van Zandt T (2008a) An integrated model of discrete choice and response time. J. Marketing Res. 45(5):593–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otter T , Johnson J , Rieskamp J , Allenby GM , Brazell JD , Diederich A , Hutchinson JW , MacEachern S , Ruan S , Townsend J (2008b) Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R , Smith PL (2004) A comparison of sequential sampling models of two-choice reaction time. Psych. Rev. 111(2):333–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psych. Bull. 124(3):372–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reutskaja E , Nagel R , Camerer CF , Rangel A (2011) Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):900–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JH , Urban GL (1988) Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. 34(2):167–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Satomura T , Wedel M , Pieters R (2014) Copy alert: A method and metric to detect visual copycat brands. J. Marketing Res. 51(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi SW , Wedel M , Pieters R (2013) Information acquisition during online decision making: A model-based exploration using eye-tracking data. Management Sci. 59(5):1009–1026.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinharay S , Stern HS (2003) Posterior predictive model checking in hierarchical models. J. Statist. Planning Inference 111(1–2):209–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith PL , Ratcliff R (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neuroscience 27(3):161–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stocker AA , Simoncelli EP (2006) Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nature Neuroscience 9(4):578–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stüttgen P , Boatwright P , Monroe RT (2012) A satisficing choice model. Marketing Sci. 31(6):878–899.Link, Google Scholar
• Tajima S , Drugowitsch J , Pouget A (2016) Optimal policy for value-based decision-making. Nat. Comm. 7(1):12400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas AW , Molter F , Krajbich I (2021) Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice. eLife 10:e57012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Towal RB , Mormann M , Koch C (2013) Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(40):E3858–E3867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend JT , Ashby FG (1983) The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Ursu RM , Wang Q , Chintagunta PK (2020) Search duration. Marketing Sci. 39(5):849–871.Link, Google Scholar
• Ursu R , Erdem T , Wang Q , Zhang QP (2024) Prior information and consumer search: Evidence from eye-tracking. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 6, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.00611.Google Scholar
• Van der Lans R , Pieters R , Wedel M (2008) Research note—Competitive brand salience. Marketing Sci. 27(5):922–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Wald A (2004) Sequential Analysis (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA).Google Scholar
• Wedel M , Pieters R , Liechty J (2008) Attention switching during scene perception: How goals influence the time course of eye movements across advertisements. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 14(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L , Toubia O , De Jong MG (2015) A bounded rationality model of information search and choice in preference measurement. J. Marketing Res. 52(2):166–183.Crossref, Google Scholar