The Good, the Bad and the Picky: Consumer Heterogeneity and the Reversal of Product Ratings
Published Online:4 Dec 2024https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03281
References
- (2022) Learning from reviews: The selection effect and the speed of learning. Econometrica 90(6):2857–2899.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The impact of fake reviews on demand and welfare. NBER Working Paper No. 31836, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):411–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econom. J. (London) 122(563):957–989.Google Scholar
- (2014) Reviews without a purchase: Low ratings, loyal customers, and deception. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):249–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The economics of recommender systems: Evidence from a field experiment on MovieLens. Proc. 24th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC ’23) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 117.Google Scholar
- (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) On information distortions in online ratings. Oper. Res. 66(3):597–610.Link, Google Scholar
- (1972) On Simpson’s paradox and the sure-thing principle. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 67(338):364–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Alone, together: A model of social (mis)learning from consumer reviews. Proc. 24th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC ’23) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 296.Google Scholar
- (2022) Extremity bias in online reviews: The role of attrition. J. Marketing Res. 59(4):675–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Reputation on the internet. Peitz M, Waldfogel J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy, Oxford Handbooks, online ed. (Oxford Academic, Oxford, UK), 343–354.Google Scholar
- (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Aggregation of consumer ratings: An application to yelp.com. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16:289–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. J. Consumer Res. 42(6):817–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) A statistical measure of a population’s propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statist. Sci. 21(2):277–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):93–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psych. Rev. 100(3):363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Behavioral equilibrium in economies with adverse selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1269–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Ratings, reviews, and the marketing of new products. Management Sci. 67(11):7023–7045.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) The effects of online review platforms on restaurant revenue, consumer learning, and welfare. Management Sci. 68(11):8116–8143.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Consumer reviews and regulation: Evidence from NYC restaurants. NBER Working Paper No. 29715, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2008) Costly expertise. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):187–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting bias components in some response styles. J. Marketing Res. 29(2):176–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The movielens datasets: History and context. ACM Trans. Interact. Intelligence Systems 5(4):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The market for fake reviews. Marketing Sci. 41(5):896–921.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Why do online product reviews have a j-shaped distribution? Overcoming biases in online word-of-mouth communication. Comm. ACM 52(10):144–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) On self-selection biases in online product reviews. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(2):449–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Consumers, experts, and online product evaluations: Evidence from the brewing industry. J. Public Econom. 126:114–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. J. Experiment. Psych. General 126(3):248.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Online review solicitations reduce extremity bias in online review distributions and increase their representativeness. Management Sci. 67(7):4420–4445.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) A model of expertise. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):747–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Learning to become a taste expert. J. Consumer Res. 46(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The welfare impact of consumer reviews: A case study of the hotel industry. Unpublished, Amazon.Google Scholar
- (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of yelp.com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 12-016, Harvard University - Business School (HBS), Boston.Google Scholar
- (2021) The effect of price on firm reputation. Management Sci. 67(7):4408–4419.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) A theory of non-Bayesian social learning. Econometrica 86(2):445–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- , et al. (2005) Incorporating behavioral anomalies in strategic models. Marketing Lett. 16:361–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) ‘Reviewing experts’ restraint from extremes and its impact on service providers’. J. Consumer Res. 47(5):654–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers. Management Sci. 63(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Digitization and pre-purchase information: The causal and welfare impacts of reviews and crowd ratings. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(6):1944–1971.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Emotionally numb: Expertise dulls consumer experience. J. Consumer Res. 48(3):355–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Overcoming scale usage heterogeneity: A Bayesian hierarchical approach. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96(453):20–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Bounded Rationality and Industrial Organization (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Bayesian networks and boundedly rational expectations. Quart. J. Econom. 131(3):1243–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8:321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Objective vs. online ratings: Are low correlations unexpected and does it matter? A commentary on de Langhe, Fernbach, and Lichtenstein. J. Consumer Res. 42(6):846–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Sci. 32(6):860–891.Link, Google Scholar

