Designing Knowledge-Driven Innovation Contests

References

• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2021) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1772–1784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Möller M (2009) Competition among contests. RAND J. Econom. 40(4):743–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown A, Chowdhury SM (2017) The hidden perils of affirmative action: Sabotage in handicap contests. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 133:273–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Gaimon C (2000) Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Sci. 46(2):265–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Gaimon C (2004) Managing knowledge-based resource capabilities under uncertainty. Management Sci. 50(11):1504–1518.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark DJ, Nilssen T (2013) Learning by doing in contests. Public Choice 156(1):329–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelius PB, Gokpinar B, Sting FJ (2021) Sparking manufacturing innovation: How temporary interplant assignments increase employee idea values. Management Sci. 67(4):2231–2250.Link, Google Scholar
• Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Dorroh JR, Gulledge TR, Womer NK (1994) Investment in knowledge: A generalization of learning by experience. Management Sci. 40(8):947–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Marion TJ (2012) Back-loading: A potential side effect of employing digital design tools in new product development. J. Product Innovative Management 29(S1):140–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu Q, Lu J (2012) The optimal multi-stage contest. Econom. Theory 51(2):351–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossmann M (2022) Adjustment costs and disinvestment in q contests. Preprint, submitted September 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4160804.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang L (2021) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Sci. 67(5):2711–2728.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Kc DS, Staats BR (2012) Accumulating a portfolio of experience: The effect of focal and related experience on surgeon performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(4):618–633.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho S-H (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Korpeoglu CG, Hafalır İE (2022) Parallel innovation contests. Oper. Res. 70(3):1506–1530.Link, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Ann. Management Rev. 4(1):109–155.Google Scholar
• Li G, Rajagopalan S (1998) Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Sci. 44(11-part-1):1517–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Menon N, Mishra A, Ye S (2020) Beyond related experience: Upstream vs. downstream experience in innovation contest platforms with interdependent problem domains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):1045–1065.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2006) Contest architecture. J. Econom. Theory 126(1):70–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möller M (2012) Incentives versus competitive balance. Econom. Lett. 117(2):505–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Stern S, Campbell G, MacCormack A (2012) Grand innovation prizes: A theoretical, normative, and empirical evaluation. Res. Policy 41(10):1779–1792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Balasubramanian S, Swaminathan JM (2009) A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Sci. 55(11):1861–1876.Link, Google Scholar
• Nittala L, Erat S, Krishnan V (2022) Designing internal innovation contests. Production Oper. Management 31(5):1963–1976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Özkan-Seely GF, Gaimon C, Kavadias S (2015) Dynamic knowledge transfer and knowledge development for product and process design teams. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):177–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1994) Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1986) Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):701–715.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Erat S, Lichtendahl KC (2025) Dueling contests and platform’s coordinating role. Management Sci. 71(2):1488–1503.Link, Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Hutchison-Krupat J, Chao RO (2022) The role of participation in innovation contests. Management Sci. 68(6):4135–4150.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor C (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2009) Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2004) The copy-exactly ramp-up strategy: Trading-off learning with process change. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 51(1):70–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S, Fujimoto T (2000) The effect of “front-loading” problem-solving on product development performance. J. Product Innovative Management 17(2):128–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiaofeng L, Erat S (2023) Spillovers on crowdsourcing platforms. Working paper, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.Google Scholar
• Yelle LE (1979) The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. 10(2):302–328.Crossref, Google Scholar