Strategic Inattention in Product Search

References

• Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almog D, Martin D (2024) Rational inattention in games: Experimental Evidence. Experiment. Econom. 27(4):715–742.Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Brooks B, Morris S (2015) The limits of price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):921–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry J, Fischer G, Guiteras R (2020) Eliciting and utilizing willingness to pay: Evidence from field trials in northern Ghana. J. Political Econom. 128(4):1436–1473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bó I, Chen L, Hakimov R (2023) Strategic responses to personalized pricing and demand for privacy: An experiment. Preprint, submitted April 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11415.Google Scholar
• Bock O, Baetge I, Nicklisch A (2014) hroot: Hamburg registration and organization online tool. Eur. Econom. Rev. 71(October):117–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Roberts J (1989) The simple economics of optimal auctions. J. Political Econom. 97(5):1060–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvano E, Calzolari G, Denicolo V, Pastorello S (2023) Artificial intelligence, algorithmic recommendations and competition. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 18176. CEPR Press, Paris & London.Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M, Leahy J (2022) Rationally inattentive behavior: Characterizing and generalizing Shannon entropy. J. Political Econom. 130(6):1676–1715.Google Scholar
• Carrasco V, Luz VF, Kos N, Messner M, Monteiro P, Moreira H (2018) Optimal selling mechanisms under moment conditions. J. Econom. Theory 177:245–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CEA (2015) Big data and differential pricing. Council of Econom. Advisors, Executive Office of the President of the United States, 1–21.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang J (2009) Dynamic targeted pricing with strategic consumers. Internat. J. Industrial Organ. 27(1):43–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) otree: An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Condorelli D, Szentes B (2020) Information design in the holdup problem. J. Political Econom. 128(2):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford V, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crémer J, Khalil F (1992) Gathering information before signing a contract. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(3):566–578.Google Scholar
• Crémer J, Khalil F (1994) Gathering information before the contract is offered: The case with two states of nature. Eur. Econom. Rev. 38(3–4):675–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crémer J, Khalil F, Rochet J-C (1998) Strategic information gathering before a contract is offered. J. Econom. Theory 81(1):163–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosetto P, Filippin A (2013) The bomb risk elicitation task. J. Risk Uncertainty 47 (1):31–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosetto P, Weisel O, Winter F (2019) A flexible z-tree and otree implementation of the social value orientation slider measure. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 23:46–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson RT (1996) Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 30(2):197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Streel A, Jacques F (2019) Personalised pricing and EU law. 30th Eur. Conf. Internat. Telecommunications Soc. (ITS): Towards Connected Automated Soc. (International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary, Canada).Google Scholar
• Dengler S, Prüfer J (2021) Consumers’ privacy choices in the era of big data. Games Econom. Behav. 130:499–520.Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Misra S (2023) Personalized pricing and consumer welfare. J. Political Econom. 131(1):131–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2004) Is there a hold-up problem? Scandinavian J. Econom. 106(3):475–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Huffman D, Sunde U (2023) The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Management Sci. 69(4):1935–1950.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):634–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Villas-Boas M (2006) Behavior-based price discrimination and customer recognition. Handbook Econom. Inform. Systems 1:377–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J. Law Econom. 24(3):461–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1980) Disclosure laws and takeover bids. J. Finance 35(2):323–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Huck S (1997) From ultimatum bargaining to dictatorship—An experimental study of four games varying in veto power. Metroeconomica 48(3):262–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Van Damme E (1998) Information, strategic behavior, and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. J. Math. Psych. 42(2–3):227–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Huck S, Ockenfels P (1996) Two-level ultimatum bargaining with incomplete information: An experimental study. Econom. J. 106(436):593–604.Google Scholar
• Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannak A, Soeller G, Lazer D, Mislove A, Wilson C (2014) Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites. Proc. Conf. Internet Measurement (ACM), 305–318.Google Scholar
• Harstad R, Nagel R (2004) Ultimatum games with incomplete information on the side of the prosper: An experimental study. Uadernos Econom. 27(75):37–74.Google Scholar
• Hart O, Tirole J (1988) Contract renegotiation and coasian dynamics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 55(4):509–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Köster M, Kőszegi B (2023) Steering fallible consumers. Econom. J. 133(652):1430–1465.Google Scholar
• Heiny F, Li T, Tolksdorf M (2020) We value your privacy: Behavior-based pricing under endogenous privacy. Preprint, submitted January 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3508762.Google Scholar
• Hidir S, Vellodi N (2020) Privacy, personalization and price discrimination. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 19(2):1342–1363.Google Scholar
• Holzmeister F, Pfurtscheller A (2016) otree: The “bomb” risk elicitation task. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 10:105–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoppe EI, Schmitz PW (2013) Contracting under incomplete information and social preferences: An experimental study. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(4):1516–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S (1999) Responder behavior in ultimatum offer games with incomplete information. J. Econom. Psych. 20(2):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichihashi S (2020) Online privacy and information disclosure by consumers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):569–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Luca M, Martin D (2021) Is no news (perceived as) bad news? An experimental investigation of information disclosure. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(2):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Kim C, Moser D (1996) Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games Econom. Behav. 13(1):100–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karle H, Peitz M, Reisinger M (2020) Segmentation versus agglomeration: Competition between platforms with competitive sellers. J. Political Econom. 128(6):2329–2374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler AS (1998) The value of ignorance. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):339–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klempt C, Pull K, Stadler M (2019) Asymmetric information in simple bargaining games: An experimental study. German Econom. Rev. 20(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A (2020) Behavioral constraints on price discrimination: Experimental evidence on pricing and customer antagonism. Eur. Econom. Rev. 121:103303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loertscher S, Marx LM (2020) Digital monopolies: Privacy protection or price regulation? Internat. J. Industrial Organ. 71(July):102623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin D (2017) Strategic pricing with rational inattention to quality. Games Econom. Behav. 104:131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin D, Muñoz-Rodriguez E (2022) Cognitive costs and misperceived incentives: Evidence from the bdm mechanism. Eur. Econom. Rev. 148:104197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikians J, Gyarmati L, Erramilli V, Laoutaris N (2012) Detecting price and search discrimination on the internet. Proc. 11th ACM Workshop Hot Topics Networks (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 79–84.Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitzkewitz M, Nagel R (1993) Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. Internat. J. Game Theory 22(2):171–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montes R, Sand-Zantman W, Valletti T (2018) The value of personal information in online markets with endogenous privacy. Management Sci. 65(3):1342–1362.Google Scholar
• Murphy R, Ackermann K, Handgraaf M (2011) Measuring social value orientation. Judgment Decision Making 6(8):771–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Sundali JA (1996) Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: Offer games. Internat. J. Game Theory 25(4):475–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Sundali JA, Seale DA (1996) Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: Demand games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 30(2):173–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roesler A-K, Szentes B (2017) Buyer-optimal learning and monopoly pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(7):2072–2080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rott P, Strycharz J, Alleweldt F (2022) Personalised pricing. Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
• Sims C (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. 50(3):665–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sims C (2006) Rational inattention: Beyond the linear-quadratic case. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):158–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub PG, Murnighan JK (1995) An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 27(3):345–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas M (2004) Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi WK (1978) A note on “lemons” markets with quality certification. Bell J. Econom. 9(1):277–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissers T, Nikiforakis N, Bielova N, Joosen W (2014) Crying wolf? On the price discrimination of online airline tickets. 7th Workshop Hot Topics Privacy Enhancing Tech. (Amsterdam).Google Scholar