When Nash Meets Stackelberg

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03418

References

  • Amdur D, Rabe BG, Borick CP (2014) Public views on a carbon tax depend on the proposed use of revenue. Issues in Energy and Environmental Policy, No. 13. Preprint, submitted July 31, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2652403.Google Scholar
  • Amigo P, Cea-Echenique S, Feijoo F (2021) A two stage cap-and-trade model with allowance re-trading and capacity investment: The case of the Chilean NDC targets. Energy 224:120129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anjos MF, Feijoo F, Sankaranarayanan S (2022) A multinational carbon-credit market integrating distinct national carbon allowance strategies. Appl. Energy 319:119181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audet C, Hansen P, Jaumard B, Savard G (1997) Links between linear bilevel and mixed 0–1 programming problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 93(2):273–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E (1985) Disjunctive programming and a hierarchy of relaxations for discrete optimization problems. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 6(3):466–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bard JF, Plummer J, Sourie JC (1998) Determining tax credits for converting nonfood crops to biofuels: An application of bilevel programming. Migdalas A, Pardalos PM, Värbrand P, eds. Multilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications (Springer, Boston), 23–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bard JF, Plummer J, Sourie JC (2000) A bilevel programming approach to determining tax credits for biofuel production. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 120(1):30–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A, Ryan CT, Sankaranarayanan S (2021) Mixed-integer bilevel representability. Math. Programming 185(1):163–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boffey D (2021a) EU threatens to block Covid vaccine exports amid AstraZeneca shortfall. Accessed March 4, 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/25/eu-threatens-to-block-covid-vaccine-exports-amid-astrazeneca-shortfall.Google Scholar
  • Boffey D (2021b) Italy blocks export of 250,000 AstraZeneca vaccine doses to Australia. Accessed March 4, 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/04/italy-blocks-export-of-250000-astrazeneca-vaccine-doses-to-australia.Google Scholar
  • Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (2008) Joint design and pricing on a network. Oper. Res. 56(5):1104–1115.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Candler W, Townsley R (1982) A linear two-level programming problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 9(1):59–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Lodi A (2022) A theoretical and computational equilibria analysis of a multi-player kidney exchange program. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 305:373–385.Google Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Lodi A, Pedroso JP (2018a) Existence of Nash equilibria on integer programming games. Vaz AIF, Almeida JP, Oliveira JF, Pinto AA, eds. Operational Research (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 11–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Lodi A, Pedroso JP (2022) Computing equilibria for integer programming games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 303(3):1057–1070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Dragotto G, Lodi A, Sankaranarayanan S (2021) The cut and play algorithm: Computing Nash equilibria via outer approximations. Preprint, submitted November 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05726.Google Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Lodi A, Pedroso JP, Viana A (2017) Nash equilibria in the two-player kidney exchange game. Math. Programming 161(1):389–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Pedroso JP, Telha C, Vyve MV (2018b) Competitive uncapacitated lot-sizing game. Internat. J. Production Econom. 204:148–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cashell B, Jackson WD, Jickling M, Webel B (2004) The economic impact of cyber-attacks. Congressional Research Service Documents, CRS RL32331 (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Chen X, Deng X (2006) Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. Proc. 47th Annual IEEE Sympos. on Foundations of Comput. Sci., vol. 6 (IEEE, New York), 261–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2005) Bilevel programming: A survey. 4OR 3(2):87–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cottle R, Pang JS, Stone RE (2009) The Linear Complementarity Problem (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Del Pia A, Ferris M, Michini C (2017) Totally unimodular congestion games. Proc. 28th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 577–588. Google Scholar
  • DeMiguel V, Xu H (2009) A stochastic multiple-leader Stackelberg model: Analysis, computation, and application. Oper. Res. 57(5):1220–1235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dempe S, Franke S (2014) Solution algorithm for an optimistic linear Stackelberg problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 41:277–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devine MT, Siddiqui S (2023) Strategic investment decisions in an oligopoly with a competitive fringe: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 306(3):1473–1494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dragotto G, Scatamacchia R (2023) The zero regrets algorithm: Optimizing over pure Nash equilibria via integer programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(5):909–1213.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eggermont CE, Woeginger GJ (2013) Motion planning with pulley, rope, and baskets. Theory Comput. Syst. 53(4):569–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egging R, Holz F, Gabriel SA (2010) The world gas model: A multi-period mixed complementarity model for the global natural gas market. Energy 35(10):4016–4029.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egging R, Gabriel SA, Holz F, Zhuang J (2008) A complementarity model for the European natural gas market. Energy Policy 36(7):2385–2414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enel Foundation (2019) VRES and grid interconnection in South America: Chile and Argentina. Accessed May 1, 2023, https://www.enelfoundation.org/topics/articles/2019/05/-research-series-on-vres-and-grid-interconnection-in-south-ameri/vres-and-grid-interconnection-in-south-america–chile-and-argent.Google Scholar
  • Facchinei F, Pang JS (2015a) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, vol. 1 (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  • Facchinei F, Pang JS (2015b) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, vol. 2 (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  • Feijoo F, Das TK (2014) Design of Pareto optimal CO2 cap-and-trade policies for deregulated electricity networks. Appl. Energy 119:371–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feijoo F, Huppmann D, Sakiyama L, Siddiqui S (2016) North American natural gas model: Impact of cross-border trade with Mexico. Energy 112:1084–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feijoo F, Iyer GC, Avraam C, Siddiqui SA, Clarke LE, Sankaranarayanan S, Binsted MT, et al. (2018) The future of natural gas infrastructure development in the United states. Appl. Energy 228:149–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming S, Miles BJ (2021) Italy blocks shipment of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine to Australia. Accessed March 4, 2021, https://www.ft.com/content/bed655ac-9285-486a-b5ad-b015284798c8.Google Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Leuthold FU (2010) Solving discretely constrained MPEC problems with applications in electric power markets. Energy Econom. 32(1):3–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Conejo AJ, Fuller JD, Hobbs BF, Ruiz C (2012) Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gilboa I, Zemel E (1989) Nash and correlated equilibria: Some complexity considerations. Games Econom. Behav. 1(1):80–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon LA, Loeb MP (2002) The economics of information security investment. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems Security 5(4):438–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimm V, Orlinskaya G, Schewe L, Schmidt M, Zöttl G (2021) Optimal design of retailer-prosumer electricity tariffs using bilevel optimization. Omega 102:102327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobbs BF, Metzler CB, Pang JS (2000) Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 15(2):638–645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holz F, Von Hirschhausen C, Kemfert C (2008) A strategic model of European gas supply (GASMOD). Energy Econom. 30(3):766–788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu X, Ralph D (2007) Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices. Oper. Res. 55(5):809–827.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeroslow RG (1985) The polynomial hierarchy and a simple model for competitive analysis. Math. Programming 32(2):146–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulkarni AA, Shanbhag UV (2014) A shared-constraint approach to multi-leader multi-follower games. Set-Valued Variance Anal. 22(4):691–720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulkarni AA, Shanbhag UV (2015) An existence result for hierarchical Stackelberg v/s Stackelberg games. IEEE Trans. Automated Control 60(12):3379–3384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labbé M, Violin A (2013) Bilevel programming and price setting problems. 4OR 11(1):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leyffer S, Munson T (2010) Solving multi-leader–common-follower games. Optim. Methods Software 25(4):601–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Meissner J (2011) Competition under capacitated dynamic lot-sizing with capacity acquisition. Internat. J. Production Econom. 131(2):535–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Lu Y (2015) The economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis. Appl. Energy 141:96–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCormick GP (1976) Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I: Convex underestimating problems. Math. Programming 10(1):147–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in N-person games. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 36(1):48–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2):286–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olsen DJ, Dvorkin Y, Fernández-Blanco R, Ortega-Vazquez MA (2018) Optimal carbon taxes for emissions targets in the electricity sector. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(6):5892–5901.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang JS, Fukushima M (2005) Quasi-variational inequalities, generalized Nash equilibria, and multi-leader-follower games. Computat. Management Sci. 2(1):21–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pozo D, Contreras J (2011) Finding multiple Nash equilibria in pool-based markets: A stochastic EPEC approach. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 26(3):1744–1752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ralph D, Smeers Y (2006) EPECs as models for electricity markets. Proc. IEEE PES Power Systems Conf. and Exposition (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 74–80.Google Scholar
  • Rosenthal RW (1973) A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Internat. J. Game Theory 2:65–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagratella S, Schmidt M, Sudermann-Merx N (2019) The noncooperative fixed charge transportation problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284(1):373–382.Google Scholar
  • Sankaranarayanan S, Feijoo F, Siddiqui S (2018) Sensitivity and covariance in stochastic complementarity problems with an application to North American natural gas markets. Eur. J. Oper Res. 268(1):25–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali HD (1984) A multiple leader Stackelberg model and analysis. Oper. Res. 32(2):390–404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simsek Y, Lorca A, Urmee T, Bahri PA, Escobar R (2019) Review and assessment of energy policy developments in Chile. Energy Policy 127:87–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein O, Sudermann-Merx N (2018) The noncooperative transportation problem and linear generalized Nash games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266(2):543–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein ND, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2008) Separable and low-rank continuous games. Internat. J. Game Theory 37(4):475–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Stackelberg H (1935) Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Econom. J. 45(178):334–336.Google Scholar
  • Weintraub R, Bitton A, Rosenberg M (2020) The danger of vaccine nationalism. Harvard Bus. Rev. Accessed March 4, 2021, https://hbr.org/2020/05/the-danger-of-vaccine-nationalism.Google Scholar
  • Woeginger GJ (2021) The trouble with the second quantifier. 4OR 19(2):157–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.