Till Tech Do Us Part: Betrayal Aversion and Its Role in Algorithm Use

References

• Aimone J, Ball S, King-Casas B (2015) The betrayal aversion elicitation task: An individual level betrayal aversion measure. PLOS One. 10(9):e0137491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aimone JA, Houser D (2012) What you don’t know won’t hurt you: A laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion. Experiment. Econom. 15(4):571–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aimone JA, Houser D, Weber B (2014) Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: An fMRI study of trust. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281(1782):20132127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Natour S, Benbasat I (2009) The adoption and use of it artifacts: A new interaction-centric model for the study of user-artifact relationships. JAIS 10. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alt R, Beck R, Smits MT (2018) Fintech and the transformation of the financial industry. Electron. Markets 28(3):235–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araujo T, Helberger N, Kruikemeier S, de Vreese CH (2020) In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI Soc. 35(3):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1971) The theory of risk aversion. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 90–120.Google Scholar
• Bartneck C, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura T (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc. 21(1):217–230.Google Scholar
• Beck AH, Sangoi AR, Leung S, Marinelli RJ, Nielsen TO, van de Vijver MJ, West RB, van de Rijn M, Koller D (2011) Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival. Sci. Transl. Med. 3(108):108ra113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D, Gana L (2012) Algorithmic trading systems: A multifaceted view of adoption. 2012 45th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, Washington, DC), 3090–3099.Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Wang W (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. JAIS 6. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard C, Chen JS, Vanduffel S (2015) Rationalizing investors’ choices. J. Math. Econom. 59:10–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnberg J, Zhang Y (2010) When betrayal aversion meets loss aversion: The effects of changes in economic conditions on internal control system choices. J. Management Accounting Res. 23. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-10087.Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Zeckhauser R (2004) Trust, risk and betrayal. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 55(4):467–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Herrmann B, Zeckhauser R (2010) Trust and the reference points for trustworthiness in gulf and western countries. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):811–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Greig F, Herrmann B, Zeckhauser R (2008) Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):294–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brogaard J, Hendershott T, Riordan R (2014) High-frequency trading and price discovery. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(8):2267–2306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton JW, Stein MK, Jensen TB (2020) A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. Behav. Decision Making 33(2):220–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao L, Yuan G, Leung T, Zhang W (2020) Special issue on AI and FinTech: The challenge ahead. IEEE Intell. Syst. 35(2):3–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castelo N, Bos MW, Lehmann DR (2019) Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cave S, Dihal K (2019) Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1(2):74–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty B, Moulton PC, Wang XF (2022) Attention: How high-frequency trading improves price efficiency following earnings announcements. J. Financial Markets 57:100690.Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Zheng L, Li L, Zheng Y, Guo X, Yang G (2017) Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified ultimatum game. Neuroscience 348:126–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dang J, Liu L (2022) Implicit theories of the human mind predict competitive and cooperative responses to AI robots. Comput. Human Behav. 134:107300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psychologist 34(7):571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Freitas J, Agarwal S, Schmitt B, Haslam N (2023) Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools. Nat. Human Behav. 7(11):1845–1854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Ge R, Zheng Z, Tian X, Liao L (2021) Human–Robot interaction: When investors adjust the usage of robo-advisors in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):774–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Glikson E, Woolley AW (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. ANNALS 14(2):627–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomber P, Kauffman R, Parker C, Weber B (2018) Special issue: Financial information systems and the Fintech revolution. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):12–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray K, Wegner DM (2012) Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1):125–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray K, Young L, Waytz A (2012) Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psych. Inq. 23(2):101–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grégoire Y, Fisher RJ (2008) Customer betrayal and retaliation: When your best customers become your worst enemies. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(2):247–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser M (2006) Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Ecco/HarperCollins Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Helberger N, Araujo T, de Vreese CH (2020) Who is the fairest of them all? Public attitudes and expectations regarding automated decision-making. Comput. Law Security Rev. 39:105456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Jones CM, Menkveld AJ (2011) Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? J. Finance 66(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Zhang X, Zhao JL, Zheng Z (2021) Fintech as a game changer: Overview of research frontiers. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Highhouse S (2008) Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Indust. Organ. Psych. 1(3):333–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong K, Bohnet I (2007) Status and distrust: The relevance of inequality and betrayal aversion. J. Econom. Psych. 28(2):197–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jussupow E, Spohrer K, Heinzl A, Gawlitza J (2021) Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? An investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):713–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Koehler JJ, Gershoff AD (2003) Betrayal aversion: When agents of protection become agents of harm. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(2):244–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kou G (2019) Introduction to the special issue on fintech. Financial Innov. 5(1):45–2199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin C, Drummond Otten C, Árvai J (2022) Paging Dr. JARVIS! Will people accept advice from artificial intelligence for consequential risk management decisions? J. Risk Res. 25(4):407–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MK (2018) Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data Soc. 5(1)2053951718756684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K (2019) How do recommender systems affect sales diversity? A cross-category investigation via randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):239–259.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy K, Chasalow KE, Riley S (2021) Algorithms and decision-making in the public sector. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 17:309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu M, Tang X, Xia S, Zhang S, Zhu Y, Meng Q (2023) Algorithm aversion: Evidence from ridesharing drivers. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02475.Google Scholar
• Logg JM, Minson JA, Moore DA (2019) Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge CK (2019) Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. J. Consumer Res. 46(4):629–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lourenço CJS, Dellaert BGC, Donkers B (2020) Whose algorithm says so: The relationships between type of firm, perceptions of trust and expertise, and the acceptance of financial robo-advice. J. Interactive Marketing 49:107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Moll FT, Ignácio FA, Bramati IE, Caparelli-Dáquer EM, Eslinger PJ (2005) The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 18(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1):81–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER (1994) Computers are social actors. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 72–78.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2015) The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MISQ 39:201–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paharia N, Kassam KS, Greene JD, Bazerman MH (2009) Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(2):134–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems:: How developers invert the firm. MISQ 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahl A, Van Swol L (2017) Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted? J. Forecast. 36(6):691–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Benbasat I (2005) Online consumer trust and live help interfaces: The effects of text-to-speech voice and three-dimensional avatars. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 19(1):75–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Gerbert P, Reeves M, Kiron D, Spira M (2018) Artificial intelligence in business gets real. Report, MIT Sloan Management Review, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Reeves B, Nass CI (1996) The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rossi A, Holthaus P, Dautenhahn K, Koay KL, Walters ML (2018) Getting to know Pepper: Effects of people’s awareness of a robot’s capabilities on their trust in the robot. Proc. 6th Internat. Conf. Human-Agent Interaction (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 246–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schanke S, Burtch G, Ray G (2021) Estimating the impact of “humanizing” customer service chatbots. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):736–751.Link, Google Scholar
• Seiders K, Flynn AG, Berry LL, Haws KL (2015) Motivating customers to adhere to expert advice in professional services: A medical service context. J. Service Res. 18(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shank DB, Graves C, Gott A, Gamez P, Rodriguez S (2019) Feeling our way to machine minds: People’s emotions when perceiving mind in artificial intelligence. Comput. Human Behav. 98:256–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shnoor B (2009) Loss of chance: A behavioral analysis of the difference between medical negligence and toxic torts. Amer. J. Trial Advoc. 33:71.Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong W (2007) Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Gardner D (2016) Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Van Swol LM (2011) Forecasting another’s enjoyment versus giving the right answer: Trust, shared values, task effects, and confidence in improving the acceptance of advice. Internat. J. Forecast. 27(1):103–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis F (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46:186–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson H, Daugherty P, Bianzino N (2017) When AI becomes the new face of your brand. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June 27), https://hbr.org/2017/06/when-ai-becomes-the-new-face-of-your-brand.Google Scholar
• Woodhouse EJ, Nieusma D (1997) When expert advice works, and when it does not. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 16(1):23–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang T, Lohrenz T, Montague PR (2013) Computational substrates of norms and their violations during social exchange. J. Neurosci. 33(3):1099–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ying X, Luo J, Chiu C, Wu Y, Xu Y, Fan J (2018) Functional dissociation of the posterior and anterior insula in moral disgust. Front. Psych. 9:334038.Google Scholar
• Zhang X (2020) Experiential and neurobiological influences on economic preferences and risky decision making. Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.Google Scholar
• Złotowski J, Yogeeswaran K, Bartneck C (2017) Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 100:48–54.Crossref, Google Scholar