Proximate (Co-)Working: Knowledge Spillovers and Social Interactions

References

• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH, Wu A (2020) Organizing knowledge production teams within firms for innovation. Strategy Sci. 5(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Oxley J (2014) Learning by supplying. Strategic Management J. 35(2):204–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Dezsoő C, Zhao M (2015) Location choices under strategic interactions. Strategic Management J. 36(2):197–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Aronow PM, Samii C, Assenova VA (2017) Cluster–robust variance estimation for dyadic data. Political Anal. 23(4):564–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arzaghi M, Henderson JV (2008) Networking off Madison Avenue. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(4):1011–1038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens GW (2017) The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 73–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkin D, Chen MK, Popov A (2022) The returns to face-to-face interactions: Knowledge spillovers in Silicon Valley. NBER Working Paper No. 30147, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Fons-Rosen C, Graff Zivin JS (2019) Does science advance one funeral at a time? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2889–2920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bafna S (2003) Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environ. Behav. 35(1):17–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrero JM, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2021) Why working from home will stick. NBER Working Paper No. 28731, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Battiston D, Blanes i Vidal J, Kirchmaier T (2021) Face-to-face communication in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(2):574–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) A macrosociological theory of social structure. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1):26–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Han R, Liang J (2023) How hybrid working from home works out. NBER Working Paper No. 30292, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Breschi S (2011) The geography of knowledge flows. Cooke P, Asheim B, Boschma R, Martin R, Schwartz D, Tödtling F, eds. Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Miller DL (2014) Robust inference for dyadic data. Working paper, University of California, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
• Carayol N, Bergé L, Cassi L, Roux P (2019) Unintended triadic closure in social networks: The strategic formation of research collaborations between French inventors. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 163(C):218–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Sacerdote BI, West JE (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Link, Google Scholar
• Catalini C, Fons-Rosen C, Gaulé P (2020) How do travel costs shape collaboration? Management Sci. 66(8):3340–3360.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014a) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2012) Open innovation where we’ve been and where we’re going. Res. Tech. Management 55(4):20–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Peukert C, Roche M (2021) Beefing IT up for your investor? Open sourcing and startup funding: Evidence from GitHub. Working Paper No. 22-001, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cowgill B, Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E (2009) Using Prediction Markets to Track Information Flows: Evidence from Google (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dingler A, Enkel E (2016) Socialization and innovation: Insights from collaboration across industry boundaries. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 109(C):50–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Marx M (2018) Founder replacement and startup performance. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1532–1565.Google Scholar
• Fang TP, Wu A, Clough DR (2021) Platform diffusion at temporary gatherings: Social coordination and ecosystem emergence. Strategic Management J. 42(2):233–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1982) Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(6):797–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K (1950) Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Working paper, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Fichman RG (2004) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(8):11.Google Scholar
• Fischer CS (1982) What do we mean by “friend?” An inductive study. Soc. Networks 3(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaspar J, Glaeser EL (1998) Information technology and the future of cities. J. Urban Econom. 43(1):136–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grieve PG, Hogg MA (1999) Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(8):926–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon N, Fisman R, Kamenica E (2019) Peer effects in legislative voting. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(4):156–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Bagde S (2015) Peers and network growth: Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Sci. 61(10):2536–2547.Link, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Koning R (2019) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbst D, Mas A (2015) Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Science 350(6260):545–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. J. Finance 62(1):251–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Turner JC (1985) Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(1):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Housman M, Minor DB (2016) Workplace design: The good, the bad and the productive. Working Paper No. 16-147, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hwang B-H, Liberti JM, Sturgess J (2019) Information sharing and spillovers: Evidence from financial analysts. Management Sci. 65(8):3624–3636.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobs J (1969) The Economy of Cities (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Kabo F, Hwang Y, Levenstein M, Owen-Smith J (2015) Shared paths to the laboratory: A sociospatial network analysis of collaboration. Environ. Behav. 47(1):57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabo FW, Cotton-Nessler N, Hwang Y, Levenstein MC, Owen-Smith J (2014) Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Res. Policy 43(9):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr NR (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2018) Immigrant Networking and Collaboration: Survey Evidence from CIC (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Kominers SD (2015) Agglomerative forces and cluster shapes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(4):877–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2019) Experimentation and startup performance: Evidence from A/B testing. NBER Working Paper No. 26278, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lane JN, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Lakhani KR (2021) Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production? Strategic Management J. 42(5):1215–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2013) With a little help from my (random) friends: Success and failure in post-business school entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(10):2411–2452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, McCall JJ (1976) The economics of job search: A survey. Econom. Inquiry 14(2):155–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV (1988) Homogeneity in confiding relations. Soc. Networks 10(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1890) Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moretti E (2004) Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: Evidence from plant-level production functions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):656–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Baum J, McGahan A, eds. Business Strategy Over the Industry Life Cycle (Advances in Strategic Management), vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 45–75.Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2013) Investment cycles and startup innovation. J. Financial Econom. 110(2):403–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Sørensen JB (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Labianca G, Chung M-H (2006) A multilevel model of group social capital. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):569–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. Internat. Regional Sci. Rev. 19(1–2):85–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Roche MP (2020) Taking innovation to the streets: Microgeography, physical structure, and innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 102(5):912–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roche MP (2023) Academic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial advisors and their advisees’ outcomes. Organ. Sci. 34(2):959–986.Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2010) Diffusion of Innovations (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Political Econom. 94(5):1002–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2001) The determinants of agglomeration. J. Urban Econom. 50(2):191–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among us entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1996) Regional Advantage (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Fang C (2014) When hubs forget, lie, and play favorites: Interpersonal network structure, information distortion, and organizational learning. Strategic Management J. 35(7):974–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Sorenson O (2003) From conception to birth: Opportunity perception and resource mobilization in entrepreneurship. Baum JAC, Sorenson O, eds. Geography and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management), vol. 20 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 89–117.Google Scholar
• South SJ, Bonjean CM, Markham WT, Corder J (1982) Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(5):587–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stefano G, King A, Verona G (2017) Too many cooks spoil the broth? Geographic concentration, social norms, and knowledge transfer. Geography, Location, and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management), vol. 36 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 267–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res. Policy 32(2):229–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorova G, Durisin B (2007) Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):774–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, McEvily B, Krackhardt D (2015) Being a catalyst of innovation: The role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organ. Sci. 26(2):423–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhao M (2018) A tale of two distances: A study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms. J. Econom. Geography 18(5):1091–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L, Holtz D, Jaffe S, Suri S, Sinha S, Weston J, Joyce C, et al. (2022) The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behav. 6:43–54.Google Scholar
• Young A (2019) Channeling Fisher: Randomization tests and the statistical insignificance of seemingly significant experimental results. Quart. J. Econom. 134(2):557–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar