Artificial Intelligence, Lean Startup Method, and Product Innovations

References

• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Press, Brighton, MA).Google Scholar
• Allon G, Askalidis G, Berry R, Immorlica N, Moon K, Singh A (2022) When to be agile: Ratings and version updates in mobile apps. Management Sci. 68(6):4261–4278.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Mulotte L, Ren CR (2016) Does experience imply learning? Strategic Management J. 37(7):1395–1412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu L (2012) Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, and information technology. Management Sci. 58(5):913–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A (1996) Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note. Econom. Lett. 50(1):51–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Industrial Econom. 38(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Stern S (1998) An empirical framework for testing theories about complimentarity in organizational design. NBER Working Paper No. 6600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Babina T, Fedyk A, He A, Hodson J (2024) Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. J. Financial Econom. 151:103745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Research note—Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Gu B, Recker J, Santhanam R (2021) Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quart. 45(3):1433–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhamu J, Sangwan KS (2014) Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 34(7):876–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S, Erzurumlu SS, Ramachandran K (2021) Sequential product development and introduction by cash-constrained start-ups. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(6):1505–1523.Link, Google Scholar
• Biemans WG (2018) Managing Innovation within Networks (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blank SA (2005) The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win CafePress.com (CafePress, Raleigh, NC).Google Scholar
• Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):63–72.Google Scholar
• Bortolini RF, Cortimiglia MN, Danilevicz ADMF, Ghezzi A (2021) Lean startup: A comprehensive historical review. Management Decision 59(8):1765–1783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? J. Econometrics 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinckmann J, Grichnik D, Kapsa D (2010) Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–Performance relationship in small firms. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):24–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2013) Complementarity in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 11–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2021) The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 13(1):333–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management 31(6):515–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao R, Koning R, Nanda R (2022) Biased sampling of early users and the direction of startup innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 28882, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Chan J (2024) Large language model in creative work: The role of collaboration modality and user expertise. Management Sci. 70(12):9101–9117.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Edgett SJ, Kleinschimidt EJ (2002) Optimizing the stage-gate process. What best practice companies are doing. Research-Tech. Management 45(5):21–27.Google Scholar
• Cui AS, Wu F (2017) The impact of customer involvement on new product development: Contingent and substitutive effects. J. Product Innovation Management 34(1):60–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming D, Walz U, Werth JC (2016) Entrepreneurial spawning: Experience, education, and exit. Financial Rev. 51(4):507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow PM, Tan ST (2021) How do accounting practices spread? An examination of law firm networks and stock option backdating. Accounting Rev. 96(1):431–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon J, Hong B, Wu L (2021) The robot revolution: Managerial and employment consequences for firms. Management Sci. 67(9):5586–5605.Link, Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2018) Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 128(3):422–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ (2011) The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: The poverty of stimulus. J. Institutional Econom. 7(2):231–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Stern S, Zenger T (2020) Lean startup and the business model: Experimentation revisited. Long Range Planning 53(2020):101889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Froot K, Kang N, Ozik G, Sadka R (2017) What do measures of real-time corporate sales say about earnings surprises and post-announcement returns? J. Financial Econom. 125(1):143–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujii H, Managi S (2018) Trends and priority shifts in artificial intelligence technology invention: A global patent analysis. Econom. Anal. Policy 58:60–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu DH, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao G, Hitt LM (2012) Information technology and trademarks: Implications for product variety. Management Sci. 58(6):1211–1226.Link, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H, Robertson TS (1989) Technology diffusion: An empirical test of competitive effects. J. Marketing 53(1):35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J (2001) The venture capital revolution. J. Econom. Perspective 15(2):145–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, Mähring M (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):57–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z, Hausman JA (1986) Errors in variables in panel data. J. Econometrics 31(1):93–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harms R, Schwery M (2020) Lean startup: Operationalizing lean startup capability and testing its performance implications. J. Small Bus. Management 58(1):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashai N, Markovich S (2017) Market entry by high technology startups: The effect of competition level and startup innovativeness. Strategy Sci. 2(3):141–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Hellmann T, Thiele V (2015) Friends or foes? The interrelationship between angel and venture capital markets. J. Financial Econom. 115(3):639–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoeffler S (2003) Measuring preferences for really new products. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):406–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoelzemann J, Manso G, Nagaraj A, Tranchero M (2024) The streetlight effect in data-driven exploration. NBER Working Paper No. 32401, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Honig B, Karlsson T (2004) Institutional forces and the written business plan. J. Management 30(1):29–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J (2018) The customer knows best: The investment value of consumer opinions. J. Financial Econom. 128(1):164–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyytinen A, Pajarinen M, Rouvinen P (2015) Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates? J. Bus. Venturing 30(4):564–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econom. Perspective 28(3):25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Tang D, Xu Y (2020) Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments: A Practical Guide to a/b Testing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2022) Experimentation and start-up performance: Evidence from A/B testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6434–6453.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Bhattacharya S (2002) Technology selection and commitment in new product development: The role of uncertainty and design flexibility. Management Sci. 48(3):313–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Loch CH (2005) A retrospective look at production and operations management articles on new product development. Production Oper. Management 14(4):433–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll M, Walters BA, Wright P (2008) Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management J. 29(4):363–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwark Y, Chen J, Raghunathan S (2018) User-generated content and competing firms’ product design. Management Sci. 64(10):4608–4628.Link, Google Scholar
• Lauga DO, Ofek E (2009) Market research and innovation strategy in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 28(2):373–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assa H (2021) Is AI ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. 45(3b):1501–1525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee OK, Sambamurthy V, Lim KH, Wei KK (2015) How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):398–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Li M, Wang X, Thatcher JB (2021) Strategic directions for AI: The role of CIOs and boards of directors. MIS Quart. 45(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Wang N, Xue Y (2022) Juggling information technology (IT) exploration and exploitation: A proportional balance view of IT ambidexterity. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1386–1402.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2016) A structured analysis of unstructured big data by leveraging cloud computing. Marketing Sci. 35(3):363–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Lou B, Wu L (2021) AI on drugs: Can artificial intelligence accelerate drug development? Evidence from a large-scale examination of bio-pharma firms. Evidence from a large-scale examination of bio-pharma firms. MIS Quart. 45(3):1451–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn GS, Morone JG, Paulson AS (1996) Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. California Management Rev. 38(3):8–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin GJ, Yurukoglu A (2017) Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(9):2565–2599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mei X, Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S, Qiu L, Wei L (2022) Sponsored data: Smarter data pricing with incomplete information. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):362–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Meincke L, Nave G, Terwiesch C (2025) ChatGPT decreases idea diversity in brainstorming. Nature Human Behav. 1–3.Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2019) What the lean startup method gets right and wrong. Harvard Bus. Rev. 10:1–4.Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Taylor TA (2007) Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. 26(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Lurie NH, Liu H (2019) Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: How are mobile reviews different? Marketing Sci. 38(5):773–792.Link, Google Scholar
• Read S, Sarasvathy S, Dew N, Wiltbank R, Ohlsson AV (2011) Effectual Entrepreneurship (Routledge, London), 240.Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Currency).Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Noble A (2018) Agile at scale. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(3):88–96.Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna PH, Zhao J (2020) Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators. J. Econometrics 219(1):101–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):243–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taddy M (2018) The technological elements of artificial intelligence. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 61–87.Google Scholar
• Tambe P (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Thiel PA, Masters B (2014) Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future (Currency).Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2020) Experimentation Works: The Surprising Power of Business Experiments (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Varian H (2018) Artificial intelligence, economics, and industrial organization. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 399–419.Google Scholar
• Verganti R, Vendraminelli L, Iansiti M (2020) Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. J. Product Innovation Management 37(3):212–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wu L, Hitt LM (2023) Social media alleviates venture capital funding inequality for women and less connected entrepreneurs. Management Sci. 70(2):1093–1112.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson LO, Norton JA (1989) Optimal entry timing for a product line extension. Marketing Sci. 8(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Hitt L, Lou B (2020) Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity. Management Sci. 66(5):2017–2039.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Lou B, Hitt L (2019) Data analytics supports decentralized innovation. Management Sci. 65(10):4863–4877.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo OS, Huang T, Arifoğlu K (2021) A theoretical analysis of the lean start-up method. Marketing Sci. 40(3):395–412.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu C (2019) Big data as a governance mechanism. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):2021–2061.Crossref, Google Scholar