Using Social Recognition to Address the Gender Difference in Volunteering for Low-Promotability Tasks

References

• Altonji JG, Blank RM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. Ashenfelter OC, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3143–3259.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2004) Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. J. Public Econom. 88(7–8):1605–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O (2018) Social incentives in organizations. Annual Rev. Econom. 10:439–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack BK (2014a) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Lee SS (2014b) Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100:44–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2017) Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):714–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacine N, Eckel C (2020) Disrupting gender norms with incentives: Differences in volunteering in the presence of asymmetric costs. Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Bai Q, Dan Q, Mu Z, Yang M (2019) A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers Psych. 10:2221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M (2012) Distributional preferences and competitive behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):125–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee R, Datta Gupta N, Villeval MC (2018) The spillover effects of affirmative action on competitiveness and unethical behavior. Eur. Econom. Rev. 101:567–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Maréchal MA, Schunk D (2009) Egalitarianism and competitiveness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):93–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Jensen R (2017) Social image and economic behavior in the field: Identifying, understanding, and shaping social pressure. Annual Rev. Econom. 9:131–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Dreber A (2016) The flipside of comparative payment schemes. Management Sci. 62(9):2626–2638.Link, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2024) Can competitiveness predict education and labor market outcomes? Evidence from incentivized choice and survey measures. Rev. Econom. Statist. 106(2):1–45. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butera L, Metcalfe R, Morrison W, Taubinsky D (2022) Measuring the welfare effects of shame and pride. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(1):122–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cárdenas JC, Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2015) Cooperativeness and competitiveness in children. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 59:32–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• De Pater IE, Van Vianen AEM, Bechtoldt MN (2010) Gender differences in job challenge: A matter of task allocation. Gender Work Organ. 17(4):433–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duersch P, Oechssler J, Schipper BC (2009) Incentives for subjects in internet experiments. Econom. Lett. 105(1):120–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley C (2018) Incentives for prosocial behavior: The role of reputations. Management Sci. 64(5):2460–2471.Link, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1345–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filiz-Ozbay E, Ozbay EY (2014) Effect of an audience in public goods provision. Experiment. Econom. 17(2):200–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallus J (2017) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4015.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Frey BS (2016) Awards: A strategic management perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1699–1714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Heikensten E (2020) Awards and the gender gap in knowledge contributions in STEM. AEA Papers Proc. 110:241–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 102(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber C, Dreber A, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Weitzel U, Abellán M, et al. (2023) Competition and moral behavior: A meta-analysis of forty-five crowd-sourced experimental designs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120(23):e2215572120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones D, Linardi S (2014) Wallflowers: Experimental evidence of an aversion to standing out. Management Sci. 60(7):1757–1771.Link, Google Scholar
• Kline P, Santos A (2012) A score based approach to wild bootstrap inference. J. Econom. Methods 1(1):23–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, Wang LC, Foo C (2018) Gender quotas, competitions, and peer review: Experimental evidence on the backlash against women. Management Sci. 64(8):3501–3516.Link, Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Fellner-Röhling G, Thoma C (2017) Do women have more shame than men? An experiment on self-assessment and the shame of overestimating oneself. Eur. Econom. Rev. 92:31–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manian S, Sheth K (2021) Follow my lead: Assertive cheap talk and the gender gap. Management Sci. 67(11):6880–6896.Link, Google Scholar
• Marianne B (2011) New perspectives on gender. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
• Massaro TM (1990) Shame, culture, and American criminal law. Michigan L. Rev. 89(7):1880–1944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Yestrumskas AH (2008) Gender differences in seeking challenges: The role of institutions. NBER Working Paper No. 13922, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Nussbaum MC (2009) Hiding from Humanity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter SR (2007) A closer look at faculty service: What affects participation on committees? J. Higher Ed. 78(5):523–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rege M, Telle K (2004) The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. J. Public Econom. 88(7–8):1625–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson CD, Gallus J, Lee MG, Rogers T (2021) The demotivating effect (and unintended message) of awards. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 163:51–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samek AS, Sheremeta RM (2014) Recognizing contributors: An experiment on public goods. Experiment. Econom. 17(4):673–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas SB, Taylor RLC, Deakin E (2019) Effects of peer comparisons on low-promotability tasks: Evidence from a university field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 158:351–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiborg VS, Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2020) Collaboration, alphabetical order and gender discrimination—Evidence from the lab. Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Paper No. 13225, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar