On the Robustness of Idiosyncratic Volatility Effect

References

• Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. J. Financial Markets 5(1):31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang A , Hodrick RJ , Xing Y , Zhang X (2006) The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. J. Finance 61(1):259–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bali T , Cakici N (2008) Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross-section of expected returns. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 43(1):29–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bali T , Cakici N , Whitelaw R (2011) Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. J. Financial Econom. 99(2):427–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barinov A (2023) Profitability anomaly and aggregate volatility risk. J. Financial Markets 64:100782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barinov A , Chabakauri G (2023) Idiosyncratic volatility, growth options, and the cross-section of returns. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 13(4):653–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer BH , Mitton T , Vorkink K (2010) Expected idiosyncratic skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(1):169–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao J , Chordia T , Zhan X (2021) The calendar effects of the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: A tale of two days? Management Sci. 67(12):7866–7887.Link, Google Scholar
• Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1):57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen LH , Jiang GJ , Xu DD , Yao T (2020) Dissecting the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly. J. Empirical Finance 59:193–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diether K , Malloy C , Scherbina A (2002) Differences of opinion and the cross-section of returns. J. Finance 57(5):2113–2141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF , French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF , French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financial Econom. 116(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (2016) Dissecting anomalies with a five-factor model. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(1):69–103.Google Scholar
• Fama EF , MacBeth J (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. J. Political Econom. 81(3):607–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu F (2009) Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 91(1):24–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K , Loh R (2016) Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle? J. Financial Econom. 121(1):167–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K , Xue C , Zhang L (2015) Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(3):650–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K , Xue C , Zhang L (2020) Replicating anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(5):2019–2133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang W , Liu Q , Rhee SG , Zhang L (2010) Return reversals, idiosyncratic risk, and expected returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(1):147–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N (1990) Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. J. Finance 45(3):881–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLean RD , Pontiff J (2016) Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? J. Finance 71(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medhat M , Schmeling M (2022) Short-term momentum. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(3):1480–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey W , West K (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shumway T (1997) The delisting bias in CRSP data. J. Finance 52(1):327–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shumway T , Warther VA (1999) The delisting bias in CRSP’s NASDAQ data and its implications for the size effect. J. Finance 54(6):2361–2379.Crossref, Google Scholar