Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints

References

• Alesina AF, Lotti F, Mistrulli PE (2013) Do women pay more for credit? evidence from italy. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(suppl 1):45–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arneson RJ (1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philos. Stud. 56(1):77–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron O, Hu M, Najafi-Asadolahi S, Qian Q (2015) Newsvendor selling to loss-averse consumers with stochastic reference points. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):456–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Bartlett R, Morse A, Stanton R, Wallace N (2022) Consumer-lending discrimination in the FinTech era. J. Financial Econom. 143(1):30–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateni MH, Chen Y, Ciocan DF, Mirrokni V (2016) Fair resource allocation in a volatile marketplace. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC '16) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 819.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31. Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2012) On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Sci. 58(12):2234–2250.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Zeevi A (2015) On the (surprising) sufficiency of linear models for dynamic pricing with demand learning. Management Sci. 61(4):723–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Brams SJ, Taylor AD (1996) Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Collis A, Eggers F (2019) Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(15):7250–7255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y(J), Smith MD (2003) Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Sci. 49(11):1580–1596.Link, Google Scholar
• Byun S-y, Park H (2012) The academic success of East Asian American youth: The role of shadow education. Sociol. Ed. 85(1):40–60.Google Scholar
• Charles KK, Hurst E, Stephens M (2008) Rates for vehicle loans: Race and loan source. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):315–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang H (2018) Why are fairness concerns so important? Lessons from pricing a shared last-mile transportation system. Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Hu M, Perakis G (2022) Distribution-free pricing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Chouldechova A (2017) Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data 5(2):153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Perakis G, Pindyck RS (2021) A simple rule for pricing with limited knowledge of demand. Management Sci. 67(3):1608–1621.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Perakis G, Thraves C (2022) Consumer surplus under demand uncertainty. Production Oper. Management 31(2):478–494.Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Gupta S, Kalas JJ, Perakis G (2020) An efficient algorithm for dynamic pricing using a graphical representation. Production Oper. Management 29(10):2326–2349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. NBER Working Paper No. 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cui HT, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Donahue K, Kleinberg J (2020) Fairness and utilization in allocating resources with uncertain demand. Proc. 2020 Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (FAT '20) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 658–668.Google Scholar
• Donini M, Oneto L, Ben-David S, Shawe-Taylor JS, Pontil M (2018) Empirical risk minimization under fairness constraints. Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. on Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS'18) (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 2796–2806.Google Scholar
• Dwork C, Hardt M, Pitassi T, Reingold O, Zemel R (2012) Fairness through awareness. Proc. 3rd Innovations Theoret. Comput. Sci. Confer. (ITCS '12) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 214–226.Google Scholar
• Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philos. Public Affairs 10(3):185–246.Google Scholar
• Elmachtoub AN, Gupta V, Hamilton ML (2021) The value of personalized pricing. Management Sci. 67(10):6055–6070.Link, Google Scholar
• Eyster E, Madarasz K, Michaillat P (2021) Pricing under fairness concerns. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 19(3):1853–1898.Google Scholar
• Fang L, Munneke HJ (2020) Gender equality in mortgage lending. Real Estate Econom. 48(4):957–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FCA (2019) Fair pricing in financial services: Summary of responses and next steps. Financial Conduct Authority, United Kingdom. Accessed on March 13, 2022, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/feedback/fs19-04.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2019) Online learning. Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (Springer, New York), 275–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gee C (2018) Fair pricing in financial services. Financial Conduct Authority, United Kingdom. Accessed on March 13, 2022, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/discussion/dp18-09.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gerlick JA, Liozu SM (2020) Ethical and legal considerations of artificial intelligence and algorithmic decision-making in personalized pricing. J. Revenue Pricing Management 19(2020):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillis TB (2020) False dreams of algorithmic fairness: The case of credit pricing. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kamble V (2019) Individual fairness in hindsight. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC '19) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 805–806.Google Scholar
• Hardt M, Price E, Srebro N (2016) Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS'16) (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3315–3323.Google Scholar
• Heidari H, Ferrari C, Gummadi K, Krause A (2018) Fairness behind a veil of ignorance: A welfare analysis for automated decision making. Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS'18) (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1273–1283.Google Scholar
• Heidari H, Loi M, Gummadi KP, Krause A (2019) A moral framework for understanding fair ml through economic models of equality of opportunity. Proc. Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (FAT '19) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 181–190.Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X (2009) Peer-induced fairness in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2022–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hooker JN, Williams HP (2012) Combining equity and utilitarianism in a mathematical programming model. Management Sci. 58(9):1682–1693.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu L, Chen Y (2018) Welfare and distributional impacts of fair classification. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hu L, Chen Y (2020) Fair classification and social welfare. Proc. 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT '20) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 535–545.Google Scholar
• Hu X-F, Li D-F, Xu G-J (2018) Fair distribution of surplus and efficient extensions of the Myerson value. Econom. Lett. 165:1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741. Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Mao X, Zhou A (2021) Assessing algorithmic fairness with unobserved protected class using data combination. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 2, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3850.Google Scholar
• Kasy M, Abebe R (2020) Fairness, equality, and power in algorithmic decision making. Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (FAT '21) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 576–586.Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Mullainathan S, Raghavan M (2017) Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. Proc. 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017) (Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik), 43:1–23.Google Scholar
• Larson J, Mattu S, Angwin J (2015) Unintended consequences of geographic targeting. Tech. Sci., https://techscience.org/a/2015090103/.Google Scholar
• Levi R, Perakis G, Romero G (2016) On the effectiveness of uniform subsidies in increasing market consumption. Management Sci. 63(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Li KJ, Jain S (2016) Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness. Management Sci. 62(9):2705–2721.Link, Google Scholar
• Lobel I (2021) Revenue management and the rise of the algorithmic economy. Management Sci. 67(9):5389–5398.Link, Google Scholar
• Madden TJ, Hewett K, Roth MS (2000) Managing images in different cultures: A cross-national study of color meanings and preferences. J. Internat. Marketing 8(4):90–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcoux AM (2006) Much ado about price discrimination. J. Markets Morality 9(1):57–69.Google Scholar
• Nabi R, Malinsky D, Shpitser I (2019) Learning optimal fair policies. Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning, Long Beach, California, PMLR 97:4674–4682.Google Scholar
• Popescu I, Wu Y (2007) Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Rahmattalabi A, Vayanos P, Fulginiti A, Rice E, Wilder B, Yadav A, Tambe M (2019) Exploring algorithmic fairness in robust graph covering problems. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), Article 1413, 15776–15787.Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1999) A Theory of Justice, revised ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson J (1969) The Economics of Imperfect Competition (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1981) Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(1):242–247.Google Scholar
• Sethuraman J, Teo C-P, Qian L (2006) Many-to-one stable matching: Geometry and fairness. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):581–596.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1985) Price discrimination and social welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(4):870–875.Google Scholar
• Viviano D, Bradic J (2020) Fair policy targeting. Working paper, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA.Google Scholar
• Wallheimer B (2018) Are you ready for personalized pricing? Chicago Booth Rev. (February 26), https://review.chicagobooth.edu/marketing/2018/article/are-you-ready-personalized-pricing.Google Scholar
• Weinberger D (2019) How machine learning pushes us to define fairness. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 6), https://hbr.org/2019/11/how-machine-learning-pushes-us-to-define-fairness.Google Scholar
• White House (2015) Big data and differential pricing. White House Report. Accessed on March 13, 2022, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/docs/Big_Data_Report_Nonembargo_v2.pdf/.Google Scholar
• Xue Z, Wang Z, Ettl M (2015) Pricing personalized bundles: A new approach and an empirical study. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):51–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Ye P, Qian J, Chen J, Chen-hung W, Zhou Y, De Mars S, Yang F, Zhang L (2018) Customized regression model for airbnb dynamic pricing. Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD '18) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 932–940.Google Scholar