The Impact of Social Investing on Charitable Donations

References

• Andreoni J, Payne A, Smith S (2014) Do grants to charities crowd out other income? Evidence from the UK. J. Public Econom. 114:75–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ASX (2019) Market statistics. Accessed January 31, https://www.asx.com.au/about/historical-market-statistics.htm.Google Scholar
• Beaman AL, Cole MC, Preston M, Klentz B, Steblay NM (1983) Fifteen years of foot-in-the door research: A meta-analysis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 9(2):181–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brest P, Gilson RJ, Wolfson MA (2018) Essay: How investors can (and can’t) create social value. J. Corporate Law. 44(2):205–231. Google Scholar
• Burger JM (1999) The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(4):303–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burlingame D, Young DR (1996) Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads (Indiana University Press, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Chung J, Michaels D (2019) ESG funds draw SEC scrutiny: Wall Street’s growing foray into impact investing has regulators questioning investors’ ESG criteria. The Wall Street Journal Online (December 16), https://search.proquest.com/docview/2326812408?accountid=14765.Google Scholar
• Ek C (2017) Some causes are more equal than others? The effect of similarity on substitution in charitable giving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 136:45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldstein M (1975) The income tax and charitable contributions: Part II—The impact on religious, educational and other organizations. National Tax J. 28(2):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawronski B, Strack F (2012) Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Givewell (2021) Accessed June 21, http://www.givewell.org/.Google Scholar
• Giving USA Foundation (2019) Giving USA 2019: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2018. Report, Giving USA Foundation, Indianapolis. Accessed June 21, https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-2019-americans-gave-427-71-billion-to-charity-in-2018-amid-complex-year-for-charitable-giving/.Google Scholar
• Global Sustainable Investment Review (2018) Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Retrived December 3, http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/GSIR_Review2018.3.28.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A, Madarász K (2014a) Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior. Management Sci. 60(11):2645–2658. Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Keenan EA, Gneezy A (2014b) Avoiding overhead aversion in charity. Sci. 346(6209):632–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Imas A, Brown A, Nelson LD, Norton MI (2012) Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Sci. 58(1):179–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Hartzmark SM, Sussman AB (2019) Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. J. Finance 74(6):2789–2837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan J, Mullen E, Murnighan JK (2011) Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(5):701–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan U, Dhar R (2006) Licensing effect in consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. 43(2):259–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kölbel JF, Heeb F, Paetzold F, Busch T (2020) Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact. Organ. Environ. 33(4):554–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krieg J, Samek A (2017) When charities complete: A laboratory experiment with simultaneous public goods. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 66:40–57. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leliveld MC, Risselada H (2017) Dynamics in charity donation decisions: Insights from a large longitudinal data set. Sci. Adv. 3(9): e1700077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Zhong CB (2010) Do green products make us better people? Psych. Sci. 21(4):494–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen E, Monin B (2016) Consistency vs. licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. 67:363–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Null C (2011) Warm glow, information and inefficient charitable giving. J. Public Econom. 95(5–6):455–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl A, Smeets P (2017) Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds? J. Finance 72(6):2505–2550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin D (2009) Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psych. Sci. 20(4):523–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (2008) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 27(1):15–25.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Staake T, Roth K, Sachs O (2013) For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy 57:160–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yörük BK (2013) The impact of charitable subsidies on religious giving and attendance: Evidence from panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(5):1708–1721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zivin JG, Small A (2005) A Modigliani-Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility. Topics Econom. Anal. Policy 5(1):10.Google Scholar