It Was 50 Years Ago Today: Recording Copyright Term and the Supply of Music

References

• Aguiar L, Waldfogel J (2018) As streaming reaches flood stage, does it stimulate or depress music sales? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 57:278–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguiar L, Claussen J, Peukert C (2018) Catch me if you can: Effectiveness and consequences of online copyright enforcement. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):656–678.Link, Google Scholar
• Biasi B, Moser P (2021) Effects of copyrights on science-evidence from the US book republication program. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 13(4):218–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourreau M, Gaudin G (2019) Streaming platform and strategic recommendation bias. Preprint, submitted December 3, 2018, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3290617.Google Scholar
• British Phonographic Industry (2019) UK record labels’ trade income reaches £1.1 billion in 2019. Accessed February 2021, https://www.bpi.co.uk/news-analysis/uk-record-labels-trade-income-reaches-11-billion-in-2019/.Google Scholar
• Brooks T (2005a) How copyright law affects reissues of historic recordings: A new study. Assoc. Recorded Sound Collections J. 36(2):183–203.Google Scholar
• Brooks T (2005b) Survey of Reissues of US Recordings (Council on Library and Information Resources and Library of Congress, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Collis A, Eggers F (2019) Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(15):7250–7255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buccafusco C, Heald PJ (2013) Do bad things happen when works enter the public domain? Empirical tests of copyright term extension. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 28(1):1–43.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Hu YJ, Smith MD (2018) The impact of e-book distribution on print sales: Analysis of a natural experiment. Management Sci. 65(1):19–31.Google Scholar
• Cho D, Smith MD, Telang R (2017) An empirical analysis of the frequency and location of concerts in the digital age. Inform. Econom. Policy 40:41–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen JE, Loren LP, Okediji RL, O’Rourke MA (2015) Copyright in a Global Information Economy (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business).Google Scholar
• Correia S, Guimarães P, Zylkin T (2019) PPMLHDFE: Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. Preprint, submitted March 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01690.Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R (2017) Copyright enforcement in the digital age: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Comm. ACM 60(2):68–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Huang Y, Smith MD, Telang R (2014) An empirical analysis of digital music bundling strategies. Management Sci. 60(6):1413–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• DiCola P (2013) Money from music: Survey evidence on musicians’ revenue and lessons about copyright incentives. Arizona Law Rev. 55(2):301.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Luca M, Svirsky D (2017) Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Weiser PJ (2003) Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Toward a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the internet age. Harvard J. Law Tech. 17:85–134.Google Scholar
• Giorcelli M, Moser P (2016) Copyrights and creativity: Evidence from Italian operas. Preprint, submitted October 6, 2014, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2505776.Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Lerner J, Stern S (2013) Digitization, innovation, and copyright: What is the agenda? Strategic Organ. 11(1):110–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heald PJ (2008) Property rights and the efficient exploitation of copyrighted works: An empirical analysis of public domain and copyrighted fiction bestsellers. Minnesota Law Rev. 92:1031–1063.Google Scholar
• Heald PJ (2009) Bestselling musical compositions (1913–32) and their use in cinema (1968–2007). Rev. Econom. Res. Copyright Issues 6(2):31–60.Google Scholar
• Heald PJ (2014a) How copyright keeps works disappeared. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 11(4):829–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heald PJ (2014b) How notice-and-takedown regimes create markets for music on YouTube: An empirical study. UMKC Law Rev. 83(2):313–328.Google Scholar
• Hendricks K, Sorensen A (2009) Information and the skewness of music sales. J. Political Econom. 117(2):324–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itzkoff D (2019) The long and winding road to ‘Yesterday,’ a film full of Beatles music. The New York Times. Accessed March 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/28/movies/yesterday-movie-beatles-songs.Google Scholar
• Knopper S (2018) The end of owning music: How CDs and downloads died. Accessed June 27, 2021, https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/the-end-of-owning-music-how-cds-and-downloads-died-628660/.Google Scholar
• Kretschmer M (2011) Private copying and fair compensation: An empirical study of copyright levies in Europe. UK Intellectual Property Office Research Paper 2011/9, Newport, UK.Google Scholar
• Li X, MacGarvie M, Moser P (2018) Dead poets’ property—How does copyright influence price? RAND J. Econom. 49(1):181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luca M (2017) Designing online marketplaces: Trust and reputation mechanisms. Innovation Policy Econom. 17:77–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacGarvie M, Moser P (2015) Copyright and the profitability of authorship: Evidence from payments to writers in the romantic period. Greenstein SM, Goldfarb A, Tucker C, eds. Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 357–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marr B (2017) The amazing ways Spotify uses big data, AI and machine learning to drive business success. Forbes. Accessed March 2021, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2017/10/30/the-amazing-ways-spotify-uses-big-data-ai-and-machine-learning-to-drive-business-success/?sh=5f48124e4bd2.Google Scholar
• Miller P (2006) Is this the end of popstar royalty? The Herald. Accessed March 2021, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/751001/Copyright_term_extension_for_sound_recordings.pdf.Google Scholar
• Mortimer JH, Nosko C, Sorensen A (2012) Supply responses to digital distribution: Recorded music and live performances. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A (2018) Does copyright affect reuse? Evidence from Google Books and Wikipedia. Management Sci. 64(7):3091–3107.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A, Reimers I (2020) Digitization and the demand for physical works: Evidence from the Google Books project. Preprint, submitted March 4 2019, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339524.Google Scholar
• Nicolaou A (2018) Revenue streams: Spotify’s bid to generate a profit. The Financial Times. Accessed March 2021, https://www.ft.com/content/974206c0-2609-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0.Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee F, Strumpf K (2007) The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. 115(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papies D, van Heerde HJ (2017) The dynamic interplay between recorded music and live concerts: The role of piracy, unbundling, and artist characteristics. J. Marketing 81(4):67–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock R (2009) Forever minus a day? Calculating optimal copyright term. Rev. Econom. Res. Copyright Issues 6(1):35–60.Google Scholar
• Pollock R, Stepan P, Välimäki M (2010) The value of the EU public domain. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, UK.Google Scholar
• Rambachan A, Roth J (2020) An honest approach to parallel trends. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Reimers I (2018) Copyright and generic entry in book publishing. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 11(3):257–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rob R, Waldfogel J (2006) Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. J. Law Econom. 49(1):29–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiller B, Waldfogel J (2011) Music for a song: An empirical look at uniform pricing and its alternatives. J. Indust. Econom. 59(4):630–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Watson J (2019) Digital sampling, copyright assertion and creative reuse. Working paper, Boston University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Telang R (2009) Competing with free: The impact of movie broadcasts on DVD sales and internet piracy. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(2):321–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Telang R (2016) Streaming, Sharing, Stealing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Stanley B (2011) Copyright extension: Good for Cliff and The Beatles, bad for the little guys? The Guardian Online (September 15), https://www.theguardian.com/music/2011/sep/15/copyright-extension-cliffs-law-beatles.Google Scholar
• Steele A (2018) Apple music on track to overtake Spotify in U.S. subscribers. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-music-on-track-to-overtake-spotify-in-u-s-subscribers-1517745720.Google Scholar
• Synovitz R (2003) EU: Copyright loophole exposes ’golden oldies’ of pop music. Accessed March 2021, https://www.rferl.org/a/1101848.html.Google Scholar
• Theofilos S (2013) A copyright extension for EU recordings. Accessed May 23, 2017, http://www.thembj.org/2013/12/copyright-extension-for-european-sound-recordings/.Google Scholar
• UK Intellectual Property Office (2018) Copyright term extension for sound recordings post implementation review. Accessed March 2021, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/751001/Copyright_term_extension_for_sound_recordings.pdf.Google Scholar
• UK Music (2019) Music by numbers 2019. Accessed March 2021, https://www.ukmusic.org/research-reports/music-by-numbers-2019/.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2006) Copyright term extension and orphan works. Indust. Corporate Change 15(6):965–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2012) Copyright protection, technological change, and the quality of new products: Evidence from recorded music since Napster. J. Law Econom. 55(4):715–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2020) The welfare effects of Spotify’s cross-country price discrimination. Rev. Indust. Organ. 56:593–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waterman D (2009) Hollywood’s Road to Riches (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Watson J (2018) Copyright and the production of hip-hop music. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) Guide on Surveying the Economic Contribution of the Copyright-Based Industries (World Intellectual Property Organization).Google Scholar