Religious Affiliation and Wrongdoing: Evidence from U.S. Nursing Homes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4350

References

  • Acierno R (2003) Elder Mistreatment: Epidemiological Assessment Methodology (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Amirkhanyan AA, Kim HJ, Lambright KT (2009) Faith-based assumptions about performance: Does church affiliation matter for service quality and access? Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 38(3):490–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold D, Dobbie W, Yang CS (2018) Racial bias in bail decisions. Quart. J. Econom. 133(4):1885–1932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atran S, Henrich J (2010) The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory 5(1):18–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian P, Bennett VM, Pierce L (2017) The wages of dishonesty: The supply of cheating under high-powered incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 137:428–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bar-Ilan A, Sacerdote B (2001) The Response to Fines and Probability of Detection in a Series of Experiments (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barker TR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):408–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker HS (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (Free Press of Glencoe, London).Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Chugh D, Mullainathan S (2005) Implicit discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):94–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bielefeld W, Cleveland WS (2013a) Defining faith-based organizations and understanding them through research. Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 42(3):442–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bielefeld W, Cleveland WS (2013b) Faith-based organizations as service providers and their relationship to government. Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 42(3):468–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromley DG (1998) Linking social structure and the exit process in religious organizations: Defectors, whistle-blowers, and apostates. J. Sci. Study Religion 37(1):145–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bush GW (2002) Remarks on proposed charity aid, recovery, and empowerment legislation. Accessed September 1, 2021, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-proposed-charity-aid-recovery-and-empowerment-legislation.Google Scholar
  • Castilla EJ (2007) Dynamic Analysis in the Social Sciences (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • Castle NG (2003) Searching for and selecting a nursing facility. Medical Care Res. Rev. 60(2):223–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castle NG, Sonon KE (2007) The search and selection of assisted living facilities by elders and family. Medical Care 45(8):729–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castle NG, Wagner LM, Ferguson JC, Handler SM (2011) Nursing home deficiency citations for safety. J. Aging Soc. Policy 23(1):34–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan-Serafin S, Brief AP, George JM (2013) How does religion matter and why? Religion and the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1585–1600.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaves M (1993) Denominations as dual structures: An organizational analysis. Soc. Religion 54(2):147–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke ME, Pierson W (1999) Management of elder abuse in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Clinics North Amer. 17(3):631–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cleves M, Gould W, Gould WW, Gutierrez R, Marchenko Y (2008) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  • CMS (2015) Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users’ Guide (CMS, Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Coleman JS, Hoffer T (1987) Public and Private Schools: The Impact of Communities (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):239–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer CB, Connolly M-T, McFeeley P (2003) The Clinical and Medical Forensics of Elder Abuse and Neglect (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Ebaugh HR, Chafetz JS, Pipes PE (2003) Where’s the religion? Distinguishing faith-based from secular social service agencies. J. Sci. Study Religion 42(3):411–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebaugh HR, Chafetz JS, Pipes PE (2006) Where’s the faith in faith-based organizations? Measures and correlates of religiosity in faith-based social service coalitions. Soc. Forces 84(4):2259–2272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans TD, Cullen FT, Dunaway RG, Burton VS (1995) Religion and crime reexamined: The impact of religion, secular controls, and social ecology on adult criminality. Criminology 33(2):195–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Filistrucchi L, Prüfer J (2018) Faithful strategies: How religion shapes nonprofit management. Management Sci. 65(1):188–208.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisman R, Miguel E (2007) Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. J. Political Econom. 115(6):1020–1048.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibelman M, Gelman SR (2004) A loss of credibility: Patterns of wrongdoing among nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas 15(4):355–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Bazerman MH (2009) When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):708–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) License to cheat: Voluntary regulation and ethical behavior. Management Sci. 59(10):2187–2203.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goergen T, Beaulieu M (2010) Criminological theory and elder abuse research—Fruitful relationship or worlds apart? Ageing Internat. 35(3):185–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac JF, Wade JB, Quinn DP (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary Elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grammich CA (2012) 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study: An Enumeration by Nation, State, and County Based on Data Reported for 236 Religious Groups (Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies, Kansas City, MO).Google Scholar
  • Greve HR, Palmer D, Pozner JE (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris-Kojetin L, Sengupta M, Lendon JP, Rome V, Valverde R, Caffrey C (2019) Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015–2016. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statist. 3:43.Google Scholar
  • Hawes C (2003) Elder Abuse in Residential Long-Term Care Settings: What Is Known and What Information Is Needed? (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Henrich J, Ensminger J, McElreath R, Barr A, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, et al. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327(5972):1480–1484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinings CR, Raynard M (2014) Organizational form, structure, and religious organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 41:159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Google Scholar
  • Iannaccone LR (1998) Introduction to the economics of religion. J. Econom. Literature 36(3):1465–1495.Google Scholar
  • Ibanez MR, Toffel MW (2020) How scheduling can bias quality assessment: Evidence from food-safety inspections. Management Sci. 66(6):2396–2416.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Inzlicht M, Tullett AM (2010) Reflecting on God: Religious primes can reduce neurophysiological response to errors. Psych. Sci. 21(8):1184–1190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter RM (1968) Commitment and social organization—Study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 33(4):499–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kay AC, Gaucher D, McGregor I, Nash K (2010) Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 14(1):37–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keenan M (2013) Child Sexual Abuse and the Catholic Church: Gender, Power, and Organizational Culture (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • King MD, Haveman HA (2008) Antislavery in America: The press, the pulpit, and the rise of antislavery societies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):492–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovacs B, Lehman D, Carroll GR (2018) Boundary kinking in public grading schemes: The effects of tie strength in social relationships. Acad. Management Proc, vol. 2018(1) (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 10704.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Harrington C, Spector WD, Mukamel DB (2010) State regulatory enforcement and nursing home termination from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Health Service Res. 45(6, Pt 1):1796–1814.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13(2):103–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohliver A (2019) How misconduct spreads: Auditors’ role in the diffusion of stock-option backdating. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):310–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore C, Gino F (2013) Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Res. Organ. Behav. 33:53–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newport F (2016) Five key findings on religion in the U.S. Accessed September 1, 2021, https://news.gallup.com/poll/200186/five-key-findings-religion.aspx.Google Scholar
  • O’Reilly CA, Chatman JA (1996) Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. Res. Organ. Behav. 18:157–200.Google Scholar
  • Odom RY, Boxx WR (1988) Environment, planning processes, and organizational performance of churches. Strategic Management J. 9(2):197–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ody-Brasier A, Sharkey A (2019) Under pressure: Reputation, ratings, and inaccurate self-reporting in the nursing home industry. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1517–1544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ornstein C, Groeger LV (2012) Two deaths, wildly different penalties: The big disparities in nursing home oversight. ProPublica (December 17). Accessed September 1, 2021, https://www.propublica.org/article/two-deaths-different-penalties-disparities-in-nursing-homes-oversight.Google Scholar
  • Osterman P (2017) Who Will Care for Us? Long-Term Care and the Long-Term Workforce (Russell Sage, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D (2012) Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C (1991) A society of organizations. Theory Soc. 20(6):725–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pew Research Center (2009) Religious groups weigh in on healthcare reform. Accessed September 1, 2021, https://www.pewforum.org/2009/10/08/religious-groups-weigh-in-on-health-care-reform/.Google Scholar
  • Pratt MG (2000) The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:456–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preston JL, Ritter RS (2013) Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 39(11):1471–1483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich AD (2014) Selling Our Souls: The Commodification of Hospital Care in the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Reinardy J, Kane RA (1999) Choosing an adult foster home or a nursing home: Residents’ perceptions about decision making and control. Soc. Work 44(6):571–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogan M, Sorenson O (2014) Picking a (poor) partner: A relational perspective on acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):301–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein RL, Black HK, Doyle PJ, Moss M, Moss SZ (2011) Faith and end of life in nursing homes. J. Aging Res. 1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruffini K (2021) Worker earnings, service quality, and firm profitability: Evidence from nursing homes and minimum wage reforms. University of California, Berkeley Working Paper.Google Scholar
  • Sawicki NN (2015) Complaints to professional and regulatory bodies. Cohen G, Hoffman AK, Sage WM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Health Law (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schnabel L, Bock S (2017) The persistent and exceptional intensity of American religion: A response to recent research. Soc. Sci. 4:686–700.Google Scholar
  • Shapira EZ (2000) Elder abuse: Society’s forgotten issue. General Dentistry 48(5):490–492.Google Scholar
  • Shariff AF, Norenzayan A (2007) God is watching you—Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psych. Sci. 18(9):803–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW, Hugill AR (2016) Monitoring global supply chains. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1878–1897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silver-Greenberg J, Gebeloff R (2021) Maggots, rape and yet five stars: How U.S. ratings of nursing homes mislead the public. New York Times (August 4), Accessed September 1, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/13/business/nursing-homes-ratings-medicare-covid.html.Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S, Cardinal L, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. (2010) Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spicer MW, Thomas JE (1982) Audit probabilities and the tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. J. Econom. Psych. 2(3):241–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steensland B, Robinson LD, Wilcox WB, Park JZ, Regnerus MD, Woodberry RD (2000) The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Soc. Forces 79(1):291–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stroube B (2021) Using allegations to understand selection bias in organizations: Misconduct in the Chicago Police Department. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutherland EH (1940) White-collar criminality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 5(1):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The Economist (2007) Praying for gain. The Economist (August 23), Accessed September 1, 2021, http://www.economist.com/node/9687820.Google Scholar
  • Tracey P (2012) Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):87–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2019) Trends in deficiencies at nursing homes show that improvements are needed to ensure the health and safety of residents. Accessed September 1, 2021, https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region9/91802010.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Welsh DT, Ordóñez LD, Snyder DG, Christian MS (2015) The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. J. Appl. Psych. 100(1):114–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams R (2006) Generalized ordered logit partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata J. 6(1):58–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Hubbard TD (2016) Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Acad. Management J. 59(1):253–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang V, Mohliver AC, King MD (2021) Where is all the deviance? Liminal and deviant prescribing underlying the prescription drug epidemic. Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.