Meeting Corporate Renewable Power Targets

References

• Aflaki S, Netessine S (2017) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources: The effect of supply intermittency. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):489–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Al-Gwaiz M, Chao X, Wu OQ (2016) Understanding how generation flexibility and renewable energy affect power market competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):114–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, de Véricourt F, Sun P (2016) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64(1):52–66.Link, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Van Mieghem J (2010) Global dual sourcing: Tailored base-surge allocation to near- and offshore production. Management Sci. 56(1):110–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Andersen L, Broadie M (2004) Primal-dual simulation algorithm for pricing multidimensional American options. Management Sci. 50(9):1222–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker McKenzie (2015) The rise of corporate PPAs: A new driver for renewables. Technical report, Baker McKenzie, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
• Baker McKenzie (2018) The rise of corporate PPAs 2.0. Technical report, Baker McKenzie, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
• BerkeleyLab (2020a) Utility-scale solar. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://rmp.lbl/gov/utility-scale-solar.Google Scholar
• BerkeleyLab (2020b) Utility-scale solar. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://emp.lbl.gov/wind-technologies-market-report/.Google Scholar
• Bertsekas DP (2005) Dynamic programming and suboptimal control: A survey from ADP to MPC. Eur. J. Control 11(4-5):310–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas DP (2011) Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, 3rd ed. (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
• Bloomberg (2018) United States rates and bonds. Accessed January 10, 2022, http://pages.news/bloomberg3.Google Scholar
• BNEF (2018a) Corporations already purchased record clean energy volumes in 2018, and it’s not an anomaly. Accessed January 10, 2022, http://energy.financial/clean4.Google Scholar
• BNEF (2018b) Executing your corporate energy strategy. Technical report, BNEF, New York, USA.Google Scholar
• BNEF (2020) Corporate clean energy buying leapt 44% in 2019, sets new record. Technical report, BNEF, New York, USA.Google Scholar
• Boyabatli O, Kleindorfer PR, Koontz SR (2011) Integrating long-term and short-term contracting in beef supply chains. Management Sci. 57(10):1771–1787.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Haugh MB (2017) Information relaxation bounds for infinite horizon Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. 65(5):1355–1379.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Smith JE (2011) Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs: Heuristics and dual bounds. Management Sci. 57(10):1752–1770.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Smith JE (2014) Information relaxations, duality, and convex stochastic dynamic programs. Oper. Res. 62(6):1394–1415.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Smith JE, Sun P (2010) Information relaxations and duality in stochastic dynamic programs. Oper. Res. 58(4):785–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruck M, Sandborn P, Goudarzi N (2018) A levelized cost of energy (LCOE) model for wind farms that include power purchase agreements (PPAs). Renewable Energy 122:131–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CDP, WWF, Calvert Investments, Ceres (2017) How the largest US companies are capturing business value while addressing climate change. Technical report, Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (Ceres), Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
• Chand S, Hsu VN, Sethi S (2002) Forecast, solution, and rolling horizons in operations management problems: A classified bibliography. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 4(1):25–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Chao X, Chen FY (2005) An optimal production and shutdown strategy when a supplier offers an incentive program. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(2):130–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Davies K, Orrick GMJ, Taylor L (2018) Proxy generation ppas. Technical report, Microsoft, Orrick, and REsurety, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
• De Farias DP, Van Roy B (2003) The linear programming approach to approximate dynamic programming. Oper. Res. 51(6):850–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Denholm P, Sioshansi R (2009) The value of compressed air energy storage with wind in transmission-constrained electric power systems. Energy Policy 37(8):3149–3158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai VV, Farias VF, Moallemi CC (2012) Pathwise optimization for optimal stopping problems. Management Sci. 58(12):2292–2308.Link, Google Scholar
• Drake DF, Kleindorfer PR, Van Wassenhove LN (2016) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1006–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EIA (2019) Capacity factors for utility scale generators primarily using non-fossil fuels. Accessed January 10, 2022, http://output.energy/eia3.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Van Ryzin G (1997) A multiproduct dynamic pricing problem and its applications to network yield management. Oper. Res. 45(1):24–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Google (2017) Environmental report: 2017 progress update. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://sustainability.google/reports/environmental-report-2017/#data-centers.Google Scholar
• Haugh MB, Kogan L (2004) Pricing American options: A duality approach. Oper. Res. 52(2):258–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Haugh MB, Lacedelli OR (2018) Information relaxation bounds for partially observed Markov decision processes. Working paper, Imperial College London, London.Google Scholar
• Hu S, Souza GC, Ferguson ME, Wang W (2015) Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency: Data granularity matters! Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):480–494.Link, Google Scholar
• İşlegen Ö, Reichelstein S (2011) Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: An economic analysis. Management Sci. 57(1):21–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang DR, Powell WB (2015) Optimal hour-ahead bidding in the real-time electricity market with battery storage using approximate dynamic programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 27(3):525–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamiya Y, Kvarnström A (2019) International Energy Agency: Data centres and energy: From global headlines to local headaches? Technical report, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Powell WB (2011) Optimal energy commitments with storage and intermittent supply. Oper. Res. 59(6):1347–1360.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer PR, Wu DJ (2003) Integrating long-and short-term contracting via business-to-business exchanges for capital-intensive industries. Management Sci. 49(11):1597–1615.Link, Google Scholar
• Lai G, Margot F, Secomandi N (2010) An approximate dynamic programming approach to benchmark practice-based heuristics for natural gas storage valuation. Oper. Res. 58(3):564–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Li CL, Kouvelis P (1999) Flexible and risk-sharing supply contracts under price uncertainty. Management Sci. 45(10):1378–1398.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Nadarajah S, Soheili N (2019) Revisiting approximate linear programming: Constraint-violation learning with applications to inventory control and energy storage. Management Sci. 66(4):1544–1562.Link, Google Scholar
• Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: A least-squares approach. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(1):113–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopuhaa HP, Rousseeuw PJ (1991) Breakdown points of affine equivariant estimators of multivariate location and covariance matrices. Ann. Statist. 19(1):229–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loukatou A, Howell S, Johnson P, Duck P (2018) Stochastic wind speed modelling for estimation of expected wind power output. Appl. Energy 228:1328–1340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucia JJ, Schwartz ES (2002) Electricity prices and power derivatives: Evidence from the Nordic power exchange. Rev. Derivative Res. 5(1):5–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MarexSpectron (2020) Renewable energy credits. Technical report.Google Scholar
• Martínez-de Albéniz V, Simchi-Levi D (2005) A portfolio approach to procurement contracts. Production Oper. Management 14(1):90–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meibom P, Larsen HV, Barth R, Brand H, Tuohy A, Ela E (2011) Advanced unit commitment strategies in the United States Eastern Interconnection. Contract 303:275–300.Google Scholar
• Milligan M, Ela E, Lew D, Corbus D, Wan Y, Hodge B, Kirby B (2012) Operational analysis and methods for wind integration studies. IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy 3(4):612–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Min S, Maglaras C, Moallemi CC (2021) Thompson sampling with information relaxation penalties. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Nadarajah S, Secomandi N (2018) Merchant energy trading in a network. Oper. Res. 66(5):1304–1320.Link, Google Scholar
• Nadarajah S, Margot F, Secomandi N (2017) Comparison of least squares Monte Carlo methods with applications to energy real options. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 256(1):196–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NREL (2017) System advisor model (SAM). Accessed January 10, 2022, https://sam.nrel.gov/.Google Scholar
• Ozment D (2014) Walmart’s approach to renewable energy. Technical report, Walmart.Google Scholar
• Pandžić H, Wang Y, Qiu T, Dvorkin Y, Kirschen DS (2015) Near-optimal method for siting and sizing of distributed storage in a transmission network. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 30(5):2288–2300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pereira MVF, Pinto LMVG (1991) Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning. Math. Programming 52(1-3):359–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PJM (2020) Day-ahead hourly lmps. Technical report.Google Scholar
• Powell WB (2011) Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritzenhofen I, Birge JR, Spinler S (2016) The structural impact of renewable portfolio standards and feed-in tariffs on electricity markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255(1):224–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• RMI (2016) Amazon and dominion virginia power reach breakthrough renewable energy agreement. Technical report.Google Scholar
• Salas DF, Powell WB (2017) Benchmarking a scalable approximate dynamic programming algorithm for stochastic control of grid-level energy storage. INFORMS J. Comput. 30(1):106–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Secomandi N (2015) Merchant commodity storage practice revisited. Oper. Res. 63(5):1131–1143.Link, Google Scholar
• Secomandi N, Kekre S (2014) Optimal energy procurement in spot and forward markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):270–282.Link, Google Scholar
• Shankleman J (2020) Google targets carbon-free power for data centers by 2030. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-14/google-ramps-up-clean-energy-ambition-as-californian-fires-rage.Google Scholar
• Shapiro A (2011) Analysis of stochastic dual dynamic programming method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 209(1):63–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh SP, Scheller-Wolf AA (2017) That’s not fair: Tariff structures for electricity markets with rooftop solar. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
• Sunar N, Birge JR (2019) Strategic commitment to a production schedule with uncertain supply and demand: Renewable energy in day-ahead electricity markets. Management Sci. 65(2):714–734.Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B, Wang Y (2005) On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(1):37–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsitsiklis JN, Van Roy B (2001) Regression methods for pricing complex American-style options. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 12(4):694–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veeraraghavan S, Scheller-Wolf AA (2008) Now or later: A simple policy for effective dual sourcing in capacitated systems. Oper. Res. 56(4):850–864.Link, Google Scholar
• WBCSD (2018) Innovation in power purchase agreement structures. Technical report, WBCSD.Google Scholar
• Webb E, Wu OQ, Cattani K (2017) Mind the gap: Coordinating energy efficiency and demand response. Working paper, Indiana University, Indiana, PA.Google Scholar
• Weber C, Meibom P, Barth R, Brand H (2009) WILMAR: A stochastic programming tool to analyze the large-scale integration of wind energy. Optimization in the Energy Industry (Springer, Berlin), 437–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weron R (2014) Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future. Internat. J. Forecasting 30(4):1030–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiser R, Bolinger M (2017) 2016 wind technologies market report. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/downloads/2016-wind-technologies-market-report.Google Scholar
• Wu OQ, Babich V (2012) Unit-contingent power purchase agreement and asymmetric information about plant outage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):245–261.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu OQ, Kapuscinski R (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):578–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu OQ, Wang DD, Qin Z (2012) Seasonal energy storage operations with limited flexibility: The price-adjusted rolling intrinsic policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(3):455–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Ye F, Zhu H, Zhou E (2018) Weakly coupled dynamic program: Information and Lagrangian relaxations. IEEE Trans. Automated Control 63(3):698–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Klabjan D, Arinez J (2015) Distributed solar renewable generation: Option contracts with renewable energy credit uncertainty. Energy Econom. 48:295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Scheller-Wolf A, Secomandi N, Smith S (2019) Managing wind-based electricity generation in the presence of storage and transmission capacity. Production Oper. Management 28(4):970–989.Crossref, Google Scholar