When Should Control Be Shared?

References

• Aghion P, Bolton P (1992) An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59:473–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bab AL (1991) Debt tender offer techniques and the problem of coercion. Columbia Law Rev. 91(4):846–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish MD, Press E (1993) Costs of technical violations of accounting-based debt covenants. Accounting Rev. 68(2):233–257.Google Scholar
• Bradley M, Roberts MR (2015) The structure and pricing of corporate debt covenants. Quart. J. Finance 5(2):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carey M, Stephen P, Rea J, Udell G (1993) The economics of the private placement market. Federal Reserve Board Staff Study (166). Published in the Staff Stud. Ser.Google Scholar
• Coffee JC, Klein WA (1991) Bondholder coercion: The problem of constrained choice in debt tender offers and recapitalizations. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 58(4):1207–1273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easterbrook FH, Fischel DR (1986) Close corporations and agency costs. Stanford Law Rev. 38(2):271–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garleanu N, Zwiebel J (2008) Design and renegotiation of debt covenants. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):749–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson SC, Warner JB (2000) Private versus public debt: Evidence from firms that replace bank loans with junk bonds. Working Paper.Google Scholar
• Grossman S, Hart O (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansmann H (1996) The Ownership of Enterprise (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hetherington JAC (1972) The minority duty of loyalty in close corporations. Duke Law J. 1972(5):921–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hetherington JAC, Dooley MP (1977) Illiquidity and exploitation: A proposed statutory solution to the remaining close corporation problem. Virginia Law Rev. 63(1):1–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Stromberg P (2003) Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contacts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):281–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P (1988) Employment contracts, influence activities and efficient organization design. J. Political Econom. 96(1):42–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1988) An economic approach to influence activities and organizational responses. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S154–S179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1994) Comparing equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(3):441–459.Google Scholar
• Nash RC, Netter JM, Poulsen AB (2003) Determinants of contractual relations between shareholders and bondholders: Investment opportunities and restrictive covenants. J. Corporate Finance 9(2):201–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Neal FH, Thompson RB (1985) O’Neal’s Oppression of Minority Shareholders (Callaghan & Co., Wilmette, IL).Google Scholar
• Stevenson SW (2001) The venture capital solution to the problem of close corporation shareholder fiduciary duties. Duke Law J. 51(3):1139–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers RS (1968) “Good faith” in general contract law and the sales provisions of the uniform commercial code. Virginia Law Rev. 54(2):195–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (2002) The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(3):171–195.Crossref, Google Scholar