Rapidly Evolving Technologies and Startup Exits

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80:41–47.Google Scholar
• Avdjiev S, Bogdanova B, Bolton P, Jiang W, Kartasheva A (2020) Coco issuance and bank fragility. J. Financial Econom. 138(3):593–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Assaf M, Chesebro T, Fierro G, Johnson K, Johnson S, Guan CL, et al. (2018) Machine learning and natural language processing on the patent corpus: Data, tools, and new measures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 27(3):535–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayar O, Chemmanur T (2011) IPOs vs. acquisitions and the valuation premium puzzle: A theory of exit choice by entrepreneurs and venture capitalists. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(6):1755–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Li K (2014) Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. J. Finance 69:1923–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Simintzi E (2019) Machines could not compete with Chinese labor: Evidence from us firms’ innovation. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Bena J, Ortiz-Molina H, Simintzi E (2022) Shielding firm value: Employment protection and process innovation. J. Financial Econom.Google Scholar
• Bengtsson O, Sensoy B (2011) Investor abilities and financial contracting: Evidence from venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 20:477–502.Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend R (2016) The impact of venture capital monitoring. J. Finance 71(4):1591–1622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Betton S, Eckbo E, Thorburn K (2007) Corporate takeovers. Espen Eckbo B, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam), 291–429.Google Scholar
• Callander S (2011) Searching and learning by trial and error. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:2277–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T, He J (2011) IPO waves, product market competition, and the going public decision: Theory and evidence. J. Financial Econom. 101:382–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T, He S, Nandy D (2018) Product market characteristics and the choice between IPOs and acquisitions. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(2):681–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T, He J, Ren X, Shu T (2020) The disappearing IPO puzzle: New insights from proprietary U.S. Census data on private firms. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Clementi GL (2002) IPOs and the growth of firms. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, MacGarvie M (2009) Patents, thickets and the financing of early-stage firms: Evidence from the software industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 618:729–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming D, Macintosh J (2003) Venture-capital exits in Canada and the United States. University Toronto Law J. 53(2):101–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2021) Killer acquisitions. J. Political Econom. 129:649–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darby M, Zucker L (2002) Going public when you can in biotechnology. NBER Working Paper No. 8954, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Da Rin M, Hellman T, Puri M (2013) Chapter 8 - A survey of venture capital research. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2, Part A (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 573–648.Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Farre-Mensa J (2020) The deregulation of the private equity markets and the decline in IPOs. Rev. Financial Stud. 33:5463–5509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farre-Mensa J, Hegde D, Ljungqvist A (2019) What is a patent worth? Evidence from the U.S. patent “lottery.” J. Finance 75:639–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine J, Gray R (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94(446):496–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fresard L, Hoberg G, Phillips G (2020) Innovation activities and integration through vertical acquisitions. Rev. Financial Stud. 33:2937–2976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Owen-Smith J (2016) A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Sci. 63:791–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaule P (2018) Patents and the success of venture-backed startups: Using examiner assignment to estimate causale effects. J. Industry Econom. 66:350–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gornall W, Strebulaev I (2015) The economic impact of venture capital: Evidence from public companies. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The cost and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94:691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2015) Where is Silicon Valley? Science 347(6222):606–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools, NBER Working Paper No. w8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hanley K, Hoberg G (2010) The information content of IPO prospectuses. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:2821–2864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Holmstrom B (2010) A theory of firm scope. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):483–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98:1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins M, Rodriguez D (2006) The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Financial Econom. 80(2):351–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu P-H, Li D (2017) Innovative originality, profitability, and stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 31:2553–2605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010) Product market synergies in mergers and acquisitions: A text based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:3773–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industry classifications and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124:1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Roberts J (1998) The boundaries of the firm revisited. J. Econom. Perspective 12(4):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamepalli SK, Rajan R, Zingales L (2020) Kill zone. Working paper no. w27146. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2000) Mergers and Productivity, Bibliovault OAI Repository (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamepalli SK, Stromberg P, Sensoy B (2002) How well do venture capital databases reflects actual investments? Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart. J. Econom. 112:169–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly B, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Taddy M (2021) Measuring technological innovation over the long run. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Insights 3(3):303–320.Google Scholar
• Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86:562–583.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2016) Technological innovation, resource allocation and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 131(2):665–712.Google Scholar
• Krishnan CNV, Masulis R (2012) Venture capital reputation. Cumming D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital (Oxford University Press, New York), 61–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanjouw J, Schankerman M (2001) Tcharacteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND J. Econom. 32:129–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 25:319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Seru A (2022) The use and misuse of patent data: Issues for corporate finance and beyond. Rev. Financial Stud.Google Scholar
• Lowry M (2003) Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much? J. Financial Econom. 67:3–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maats F, Metrick A, Yasuda A, Hinkes B, Vershovski S (2011) On the consistency and reliability of venture capital databases. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (1990) Punctuated equilibria and technological progress. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80:350–354.Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2013) Investment cycles and startup innovation. J. Financial Econom. 110:403–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Packalen M, Bhattacharya J (2018) New ideas in invention. NBER Working Paper No. 202922, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Pastor L, Veronesi P (2005) Rational IPO waves. J. Finance 60(4):1713–1757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips G, Zhdanov A (2013) R&D and the incentives from merger and acquisition activity. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(1):34–78, 189–238.Google Scholar
• Poulsen A, Stegemoller M (2008) Moving from private to public ownership: Selling out to public firms vs. initial public offerings. Financial Management 37(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritter J (2019) Initial Public Offerings: Updated Statistics (University of Florida).Google Scholar
• Sebastiani F (2002) Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surveys 34:1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovative New Tech. 5:19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar