Vertical Integration and Foreclosure: Evidence from Production Network Data

References

• Alfaro L, Conconi P, Fadinger H, Newman AF (2016) Do prices determine vertical integration? Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(3):855–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allain M-L, Chambolle C, Rey P (2011) Vertical integration. Information and foreclosure. Working paper, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.Google Scholar
• Allain M-L, Chambolle C, Rey P (2016) Vertical integration as a source of hold-up. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asker J (2016) Diagnosing foreclosure due to exclusive dealing. J. Industry Econom. 64(3):375–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atalay E, Hortaçsu A, Li MJ, Syverson C (2019) How wide is the firm border? Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):1845–1882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkai S (2016) Declining labor and capital shares. J. Finance 75:2421–2463.Google Scholar
• Barrot J-N, Sauvagnat J (2016) Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in prodction networks. Quart. J. Econom. 131(3):1543–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard AB, Dhingra S (2015) Contracting and the division of the gains from trade. NBER working paper No. 21691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bernard AB, Dhyne E, Magerman G, Manova K, Moxnes A (2017) The origins of firm heterogeneity: A production network approach. Unpublished manuscript, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
• Blonigen BA (1997) Firm-specific assets and the link between exchange rates and foreign direct investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):447–466.Google Scholar
• Blonigen BA, Pierce JR (2016) Evidence for the effects of mergers on market power and efficiency. NBER Working Paper No. 22750, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Boehm CE, Flaaen A, Pandalai-Nayar N (2019) Input linkages and the transmission of shocks: firm-level evidence from the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake. Rev. Econom. Statist. 101(1):60–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollaert H, Delanghe M (2015) Securities Data Company and Zephyr, data sources for M&A research. J. Corporate Finance 33:85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Whinston MD (1993) Incomplete contracts, vertical integration, and supply assurance. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(1):121–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breinlich H (2008) Trade liberalization and industrial restructuring through mergers and acquisitions. J. Internat. Econom. 76(2):254–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brot-Goldberg Z, de Vaan M (2018) Intermediation and vertical integration in the market for surgeons. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Bureau Van Dijk (2017) Zephyr Glossary. Report, Bureau Van Dijk, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
• Carballo J, Ottaviano GIP, Martincus CV (2018) The buyer margins of firms’ exports. J. Internat. Econom. 112:33–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carvalho VM, Nirei M, Saito Y, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2021) Supply chain disruptions: Evidence from the great east Japan earthquake. Quart. J. Econom. 136(2):1255–1321.Google Scholar
• Chen Y (2001) On vertical mergers and their competitive effects. RAND J. Econom. 32(4):667–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernew M, Cooper Z, Larsen-Hallock E, Morton FS (2018) Are Health Care Services Shoppable? Evidence from the Consumption of Lower-Limb MRI Scans (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chipty T (2001) Vertical integration, market foreclosure, and consumer welfare in the cable television industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):428–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford GS, Lee RS, Whinston MD, Yurukoglu A (2018) The welfare effects of vertical integration in multichannel television markets. Econometrica 86(3):891–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuesta JI, Noton C, Vatter B (2018) Vertical integration between hospitals and insurers. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2021) Killer acquisitions. J. Political Econom. 129(3):649–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Loecker J, Eeckhout J, Unger G (2020) The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Quart. J. Econom. 135(2):561–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessaint O, Foucault T, Frésard L, Matray A (2019) Noisy stock prices and corporate investment. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(7):2625–2672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Goldstein I, Jiang W (2012) The real effects of financial markets: The impact of prices on takeovers. J. Finance 67(3):933–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekholm K, Forslid R, Markusen JR (2007) Export-platform foreign direct investment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(4):776–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giroud X, Mueller HM (2017) Firms’ internal networks and local economic shocks. NBER Working paper no. 23176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N, Topalova P (2010) Multiproduct firms and product turnover in the developing world: Evidence from India. Rev. Econom. Statist. 92(4):1042–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadalupe M, Kuzmina O, Thomas C (2012) Innovation and foreign ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3594–3627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gugler K, Szücs F (2016) Merger externalities in oligopolistic markets. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 47:230–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gugler K, Mueller DC, Yurtoglu BB, Zulehner C (2003) The effects of mergers: an international comparison. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 21(5):625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez G, Philippon T (2017) Declining competition and investment in the US. NBER Working paper no. 23583, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutierrez G, Philippon T (2018) How EU markets became more competitive than US markets: A study of institutional drift. NBER Working Paper No. 24700, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Harford J, Schonlau R, Stanfield J (2019) Trade relationships, indirect economic links, and mergers. Management Sci. 65(July):3085–3110.Link, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Tirole J (1990) Vertical integration and market foreclosure. Brookings Papers Econom. Act Microeconom. 1990:205–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastings JS, Gilbert RJ (2005) Market power, vertical integration and the wholesale price of gasoline. J. Industry Econom. 53(4):469–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho K, Lee RS (2017) Insurer competition in health care markets. Econometrica 85(2):379–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho K, Lee RS (2019) Equilibrium provider networks: Bargaining and exclusion in health care markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(2):473–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010) Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3773–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hortaçsu A, Syverson C (2007) Cementing relationships: Vertical integration, foreclosure, productivity, and prices. J. Political Econom. 115(2):250–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes JS, Kao JL (2001) Vertical integration and proprietary information transfers. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(2):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huneeus F (2018) Production network dynamics and the propagation of shocks. Working paper, Central Bank of Chile, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
• Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sorensen B, Villegas-Sanchez C, Volosovych V, Yesiltas S (2015) How to construct nationally representative firm level data from the orbis global database. NBER Working Paper No. 21558, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kikkawa AK, Magerman G, Dhyne E (2018) Imperfect competition in firm-to-firm trade. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. 21(2):297–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lafontaine F, Slade M (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature 45(3):629–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maksimovic V, Phillips G, Yang L (2013) Private and public merger waves. J. Finance 68(5):2177–2217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Moretti E, Peters FS (2018) Winning by losing: Evidence on the long-run effects of mergers. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(8):3212–3264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, Schwartz M (1994) Opportunism in multilateral vertical contracting: Nondiscrimination, exclusivity, and uniformity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(4):210–230.Google Scholar
• Miyauchi Y (2018) Matching and agglomeration: Theory and evidence from Japanese firm-to-firm trade. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Nocke V, Yeaple S (2007) Cross-border mergers and acquisitions vs. greenfield foreign direct investment: The role of firm heterogeneity. J. Internat. Econom. 72(2):336–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberfield E (2018) A theory of input–output architecture. Econometrica 86(2):559–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien DP, Shaffer G (1992) Vertical control with bilateral contracts. RAND J. Econom. 23(3):299–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ordover JA, Saloner G, Salop SC (1990) Equilibrium vertical foreclosure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):127–142.Google Scholar
• Rauh JD, Sufi A (2011) Explaining corporate capital structure: Product markets, leases, and asset similarity. Rev. Finance 16(1):115–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rey P, Tirole J (2007) A primer on foreclosure. Armstrong M, Porter RH, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 2145–2220.Google Scholar
• Rhodes-Kropf M, Viswanathan S (2004) Market valuation and merger waves. J. Finance 59(6):2685–2718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salop SC (2017) Invigorating vertical merger enforcement. Yale Law J. 127:1962.Google Scholar
• Salop SC, Culley DP (2015) Revising the US vertical merger guidelines: Policy issues and an interim guide for practitioners. J. Antitrust Enforcement 4(1):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2007) Preliminary communications on schedule 14D-9 related to Komag Inc. Accessed March 5, 2022, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/106040/000089256907000897/a31572t3sctovc.htm.Google Scholar
• Shenoy J (2012) An examination of the efficiency, foreclosure, and collusion rationales for vertical takeovers. Management Sci. 58(8):1482–1501.Link, Google Scholar
• Slade ME (2021) Vertical mergers: A survey of ex post evidence and ex ante evaluation methods. Rev. Indust. Organ. 58:493–511.Google Scholar
• Stiebale J (2016) Cross-border M&As and innovative activity of acquiring and target firms. J. Internat. Econom. 99:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiebale J, Szücs F (2019) Mergers and market power: Evidence from rivals’ responses in European markets. Working paper, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.Google Scholar
• The Economist (2018) Regulators across the West are in need of a shake-up. The Economist (November 15). https://www.economist.com/special-report/2018/11/15/regulators-across-the-west-are-in-need-of-a-shake-up.Google Scholar
• Tintelnot F, Kikkawa AK, Mogstad M, Dhyne E (2021) Trade and domestic production networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(2):643–668.Google Scholar
• Waterman D, Weiss AA (1996) The effects of vertical integration between cable television systems and pay cable networks. J. Econometrics 72(1-2):357–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wollmann TG (2019) Stealth consolidation: Evidence from an amendment to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 1(1):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wollmann TG (2020) How to get away with merger: Stealth consolidation and its real effects on US healthcare. NBER Working paper no. 27274, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Xu R (2021) On the instrument functional form with a binary endogenous explanatory variable. Econom. Lett. 206:109993.Crossref, Google Scholar