Is Price Commitment a Better Solution to Control Carbon Emissions and Promote Technology Investment?
References
- (2020) Pollution regulation of competitive markets. Management Sci. 66(9):4193–4206.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Climate Policy Uncertainty and Investment Risk (International Energy Agency, Paris).Google Scholar
- (2004) Forecasting with a nonlinear dynamic model of stock returns and industrial production. Internat. J. Forecasting 20(2):321–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Dynamic Adjustment to Incentive Based Policy to Improve Efficiency and Performance (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2012) Allocation and leakage in regional cap-and-trade markets for CO2. Resources Energy Econom. 34(4):647–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) A model of carbon price interactions with macroeconomic and energy dynamics. Energy Econom. 33(6):1295–1312.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Commodity Inside (2019) Cement market in Europe. Accessed July 16, 2020, https://commodityinside.com/reports/cement-market-in-europe/.Google Scholar
- S (2017) An international carbon-price commitment promotes cooperation. Cramton P, MacKay DJ, Ockenfels A, eds. Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation (MIT Press, London), 221.Google Scholar
- (2006) CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering vs. output-based allocation. Climate Policy 6(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Carbon tariffs: Effects in settings with technology choice and foreign production cost advantage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):667–686.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1006–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Scoping paper “the potential for CDM induced leakage in energy intensive sectors”. SEI and CEPS. Research paper, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/system/files/2017-02/potential_leakage_en_0.pdf.Google Scholar
- European Aluminium (2019) Vision 2050: European aluminium’s contribution to the EU mid-century low carbon roadmap. Accessed July 15, 2020, https://www.european-aluminium.eu/vision-2050/.Google Scholar
- European Commission (2020) Pulp and paper industry. Accessed July 15, 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/related-industries/forest-based-industries/pulp-and-paper-industry_en.Google Scholar
- (2018) Will high European carbon prices last. Accessed July 25, 2020, https://www.refinitiv.com/perspectives/market-insights/will-high-european-carbon-prices-last/.Google Scholar
- Forbes (2019) 101 companies committed to reducing their carbon footprint. Accessed October 20, 2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2019/08/26/101-companies-committed-to-reducing-their-carbon-footprint/.Google Scholar
- (2014) Cap-setting, price uncertainty and investment decisions in emissions trading systems. Accessed July 20, 2020, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/311914/EU_ETS_cap-setting_project_REPORT.pdf.Google Scholar
- Global Cement (2019) European Union CO2 emissions data from cement plants in 2018. Accessed July 20, 2020, https://www.globalcement.com/news/item/9060-european-union-co2-emissions-data-from-cement-plants-in-2018.Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimal production planning with emissions trading. Oper. Res. 61(4):908–924.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Impacts of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme on the Industrial Competitiveness in Germany (German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin).Google Scholar
- (1997) The cost of air pollution abatement. Appl. Econom. 29(6):759–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: A review of instrument choice. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 22(2):226–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Carbon leakage: The impact of asymmetric regulation on carbon-emitting production. Production Oper. Management (Wiley Online Library), 30(6):1886–1903.Google Scholar
- IEA (2007) Climate policy uncertainty and investment risk. Accessed July 15, 2020, https://www.iea.org/reports/climate-policy-uncertainty-and-investment-risk.Google Scholar
- Impact Hub (2018) 5 big companies reducing their carbon footprints. Accessed October 20, 2020, https://impacthub.net/5-big-companies-reducing-their-carbon-footprints/.Google Scholar
- (2015) The Impacts of Climate Policy on Facility Location, Production and Shipping. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1035–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Prices vs. quantities: The effects on technology choice. J. Public Econom. 92(5-6):1275–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Pollution permits and environmental innovation. J. Public Econom. 62(1-2):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Optimal taxation for polluting oligopolists with endogenous market structure. J. Regulatory Econom. 15(3):293–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Price carbon—I will if you will. Nature 526(7573):315–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Prices vs. quantities: Environmental regulation and imperfect competition. J. Regulatory Econom. 44(1):80–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- McKinsey (2013) Pathways to a low carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. Accessed October 10, 2020, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/pathways-to-a-low-carbon-economy.Google Scholar
- McKinsey, Ecofys (2006) EU ETS Review: Report on International Competitiveness (European Commission Directorate General for Environment, Brussels). https://ec.europa.eu/clima/system/files/2016-11/report_int_competitiveness_20061222_en.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1984) Endogenous technical change and environmental regulation. J. Environ. Econom. Management 11(3):202–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Designing a carbon tax to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 3(1):63–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Permits, standards, and technology innovation. J. Environ. Econom. Management 44(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Closing a supplier’s energy efficiency gap through assessment assistance and procurement commitment. Management Sci. 65(1):122–138.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
- (2002) Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. J. Public Econom. 85(3):409–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Pollution control in a cournot duopoly via taxes or permits. J. Econom. 58(3):255–291.Google Scholar
- (1998) Incentives to innovate under emission taxes and tradeable permits. Eur. J. Political Econom. 14(1):139–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Environmental policy under imperfect competition. Internat. Yearbook Environ. Resource Econom. 2007:120–207.Google Scholar
- (2017) Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade. Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 11(1):59–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Profitable cost increases and the shifting of taxation: Equilibrium responses of markets in oligopoly. Technical report, The University of Warwick, Coventry.Google Scholar
- (1995) Optimal linear taxation of polluting oligopolists. J. Regulatory Econom. 7(1):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Siemens (2018) Siemens is going carbon neutral by 2030. Accessed October 20, 2020, https://press.siemens.com/global/en/feature/siemens-going-carbon-neutral-2030.Google Scholar
- (2006) The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy 6(1):31–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Statista (2019) Cement prices in the United States from 2007 to 2019. Accessed July 16, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/219339/us-prices-of-cement/.Google Scholar
- (2007) Compliance strategies under permits for emissions. Production Oper. Management 16(6):763–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Tradable emission rights and strategic interaction. Environ. Resources Econom. 3(2):129–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Green technology development and adoption: Competition, regulation, and uncertainty—A global game approach. Management Sci. 67(1):201–219.Link, Google Scholar
- (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev. Econom. Stud. 41(4):477–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Internalizing the climate externality: Can a uniform price commitment help? Econom. Energy Environ. Policy 4(2):37–50.Google Scholar
- (2011) Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. Internat. J. Production Econom. 131(2):519–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Joint control of emissions permit trading and production involving fixed and variable transaction costs. Production Oper. Management 27(8):1420–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: Tradable emission permits and emissions charges. J. Public Econom. 87(12):2765–2789.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Long-run equilibrium modeling of emissions allowance allocation systems in electric power markets. Oper. Res. 58(3):529–548.Link, Google Scholar

