What (Exactly) Is Novelty in Networks? Unpacking the Vision Advantages of Brokers, Bridges, and Weak Ties

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4377

References

  • Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off1. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne MW (2007) Productivity effects of information diffusion in networks. Preprint, submitted May 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.987499.Google Scholar
  • Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2012) Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-2):849–867.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker WE (1990) Market networks and corporate behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 96(3):589–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
  • Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Statist. Mechanical Theory Experiment. 2008(10):P10008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulkley N, Van Alstyne MW (2004) Why information should influence productivity. Preprint, submitted March 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.518242.Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (1995) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (OUP, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2008) Information and structural holes: Comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Industrial Corporate Change 17(5):953–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cover TM (1999) Elements of Information Theory (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dhillon PS, Foster D, Ungar L (2011) Multi-view learning of word embeddings via CCA. Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel R, Bartlett P, Pereira F, Weinberger KQ, eds. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. on Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 24 (Curran Associates, Inc.), 199–207.Google Scholar
  • Dhillon PS, Foster DP, Ungar LH (2015) Eigenwords: Spectral word embeddings. J. Machine Learn. Res. 16(95):3035–3078.Google Scholar
  • Dhillon PS, Rodu J, Foster D, Ungar LH (2012) Two step CCA: A new spectral method for estimating vector models of words. Langford J, Pineau J, eds. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn. (Omnipress, New York), 1551–1558.Google Scholar
  • Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossinets G, Watts DJ (2006) Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 311(5757):88–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazer D, Friedman A (2007) The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):667–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., 1188–1196.Google Scholar
  • Loper E, Bird S (2002) Nltk: The natural language toolkit. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/0205028.Google Scholar
  • Manning C, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of Statical Natural Language Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2003) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Preprint, submitted XX, https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546.Google Scholar
  • Newman MEJ, Park J (2003) Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Phys. Rev. E 68(3):036122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the medici, 1400-1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6):1259–1319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD (2014) Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1532–1543.Google Scholar
  • Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market1. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reynolds MC, Van Alstyne M, Aral S (2009) Functions that preserve privacy but permit analysis of text. MIT Center for Digital Business Working Paper, 246.Google Scholar
  • Rodan S, Galunic DC (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25:541–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saramäki J, Kaski K (2004) Scale-free networks generated by random walkers. Phys. A 341:80–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundararajan A, Provost F, Oestreicher-Singer G, Aral S (2013) Research commentary-information in digital, economic, and social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):883–905.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turney PD, Pantel P (2010) From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 37:141–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem1. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Alstyne M, Brynjolfsson E (2005) Global village or cyber-Balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Sci. 51(6):851–868.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu F, Huberman BA, Adamic LA, Typer JR (2004) Information flow in social groups. Phys. A 337(1-2):327–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.