Addictive Platforms
References
- (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(2):211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Digital addiction. Working paper No. w28936, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2020) The welfare effects of social media. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(3):629–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
- (2005) Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):947–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Competition for attention in the information (overload) age. RAND J. Econom. 43(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Ad clutter, time use and media diversity. Preprint, submitted August 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674907.Google Scholar
- (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Competitive price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 32(4):579–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Competition for attention. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):481–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions. Addictive Behav. 96:26–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Business models for streaming platforms: Content acquisition, advertising and users. Inform. Econom. Policy 52(C):100877.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Two-sided platforms and biases in technology adoption. TSE Working Paper n.20-1143, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
- (2019) Competition policy for the digital era. Report for the European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- (2020) Data and competition: A general framework with applications to mergers, market structure, and privacy policy. TSE Working Paper n.20-1076, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
- (2017) The economics of attention markets. Preprint, submitted October 2, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044858.Google Scholar
- (2019) Attention platforms, the value of content, and public policy. Rev. Indust. Organ. 54(4):775–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) A dual-self model of impulse control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1449–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Coordination motives and competition for attention in information markets. J. Econom. Theory 188:105–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Many-to-many matching and price discrimination. Theoretical Econom. 11(3):1005–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Is addiction “rational”? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1261–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Data-enabled learning, network effects and competitive advantage. Working paper, Boston University Questrom School of Business, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2022) Second-degree price discrimination by a two-sided monopoly platform. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 14(2):322–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Video game addiction. Essau CA, Delfabbro PH, eds. Adolescent Addiction (Elsevier, Cambridge, MA), 185–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Two-sided price discrimination by media platforms. Marketing Sci. 39(2):317–338.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2):583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(14):2612.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The economic effects of facebook. Experiment. Econom. 23(2):575–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
- (2019) The tragedy of complexity. LSE and CEU Working Paper.Google Scholar
- (1995) Rational addiction with learning and regret. J. Political Econom. 103(4):739–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Attention oligopoly. Preprint, submitted June 21, 2018, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3197930.Google Scholar
- (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Addictive technology and its implications for antitrust enforcement. Preprint, submitted March 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787822.Google Scholar
- (2010) Foundations of intrinsic habit formation. Econometrica 78(4):1341–1373.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Roadmap for an antitrust case against Facebook. Technical report, Omidyar Network.Google Scholar
- (2019) Report: Committee for the Study of Digital Platforms—Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee (George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2021) The effects of competition and entry in multi-sided markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(2):1002–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) An economic theory of self-control. J. Political Econom. 89(2):392–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
- UK Digital Competition Expert Panel (2019) Unlocking digital competition: Report of the digital competition expert panel. Report prepared for the Government of the United Kingdom, London.Google Scholar
- (2017) Blind spot: The attention economy and the law. Antitrust Law J. 82:771–806.Google Scholar

