Addictive Platforms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4392

References

  • Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(2):211–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Gentzkow M, Song L (2021) Digital addiction. Working paper No. w28936, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2020) The welfare effects of social media. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(3):629–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter A (2017) Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
  • Anderson SP, Coate S (2005) Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):947–972.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, De Palma A (2012) Competition for attention in the information (overload) age. RAND J. Econom. 43(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, Peitz M (2020) Ad clutter, time use and media diversity. Preprint, submitted August 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674907.Google Scholar
  • Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong M, Vickers J (2001) Competitive price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 32(4):579–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Competition for attention. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):481–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks GA, Clark L (2019) Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions. Addictive Behav. 96:26–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroni E, Paolini D (2020) Business models for streaming platforms: Content acquisition, advertising and users. Inform. Econom. Policy 52(C):100877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JP, Jeon D-S (2020) Two-sided platforms and biases in technology adoption. TSE Working Paper n.20-1143, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
  • Crémer J, de Montjoye YA, Schweitzer H (2019) Competition policy for the digital era. Report for the European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  • de Corniere A, Taylor G (2020) Data and competition: A general framework with applications to mergers, market structure, and privacy policy. TSE Working Paper n.20-1076, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
  • Evans DS (2017) The economics of attention markets. Preprint, submitted October 2, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044858.Google Scholar
  • Evans DS (2019) Attention platforms, the value of content, and public policy. Rev. Indust. Organ. 54(4):775–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Levine DK (2006) A dual-self model of impulse control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1449–1476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galperti S, Trevino I (2020) Coordination motives and competition for attention in information markets. J. Econom. Theory 188:105–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomes R, Pavan A (2016) Many-to-many matching and price discrimination. Theoretical Econom. 11(3):1005–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber J, Köszegi B (2001) Is addiction “rational”? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1261–1303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagiu A, Wright J (2020) Data-enabled learning, network effects and competitive advantage. Working paper, Boston University Questrom School of Business, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Jeon DS, Kim BC, Menicucci D (2022) Second-degree price discrimination by a two-sided monopoly platform. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 14(2):322–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King DL, Delfabbro PH (2020) Video game addiction. Essau CA, Delfabbro PH, eds. Adolescent Addiction (Elsevier, Cambridge, MA), 185–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin S (2020) Two-sided price discrimination by media platforms. Marketing Sci. 39(2):317–338.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Segal I (2002) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2):583–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montag C, Lachmann B, Herrlich M, Zweig K (2019) Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(14):2612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mosquera R, Odunowo M, McNamara T, Guo X, Petrie R (2020) The economic effects of facebook. Experiment. Econom. 23(2):575–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newport C (2019) Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
  • Oehmke M, Zawadowski A (2019) The tragedy of complexity. LSE and CEU Working Paper.Google Scholar
  • Orphanides A, Zervos D (1995) Rational addiction with learning and regret. J. Political Econom. 103(4):739–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prat A, Valletti TM (2019) Attention oligopoly. Preprint, submitted June 21, 2018, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3197930.Google Scholar
  • Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenquist JN, Scott Morton F, Weinstein SN (2021) Addictive technology and its implications for antitrust enforcement. Preprint, submitted March 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787822.Google Scholar
  • Rozen K (2010) Foundations of intrinsic habit formation. Econometrica 78(4):1341–1373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott Morton F, Dinielli D (2020) Roadmap for an antitrust case against Facebook. Technical report, Omidyar Network.Google Scholar
  • Scott Morton F, Bouvier P, Ezrachi A, Jullien B, Katz R, Kimmelman G, Melamed AD, Morgenstern J (2019) Report: Committee for the Study of Digital Platforms—Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee (George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Tan G, Zhou J (2021) The effects of competition and entry in multi-sided markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(2):1002–1030.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Shefrin HM (1981) An economic theory of self-control. J. Political Econom. 89(2):392–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • UK Digital Competition Expert Panel (2019) Unlocking digital competition: Report of the digital competition expert panel. Report prepared for the Government of the United Kingdom, London.Google Scholar
  • Wu T (2017) Blind spot: The attention economy and the law. Antitrust Law J. 82:771–806.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.