Female Directors and Firm Value: New Evidence from Directors’ Deaths

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58(2):219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Kirchmaier T (2015) Barriers to boardrooms. Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
• Adams R, Akyol AC, Verwijmeren P (2018) Director skill sets. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):641–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adda J, Dustmann C, Stevens K (2017) The career costs of children. J. Polit. Econom. 125(2):293–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Duchin R, Shumway T (2014) Peer effects in risk aversion and trust. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(11):3213–3240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albrecht J, Björklund A, Vroman S (2003) Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden? J. Labor Econom. 21(1):145–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Giuliano P, Nunn N (2013) On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):469–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakke TE, Black J, Mahmudi H, Linn SC (2021) Director networks and firm value. Working paper, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Pèrez-Gonzàlez F, Wolfenzon D (2020) Do CEOs matter? Evidence from CEO hospitalization events. J. Finance 75(4):1877–1911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2018) Coase Lecture—the glass ceiling. Economica 85(338):205–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):228–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):191–239.Google Scholar
• Betzer A, Lee HS, Limbach P, Salas JM (2020) Are generalists beneficial to corporate shareholders? Evidence from exogenous executive turnovers. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55(2):581–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black SE, Juhn C (1990) The rise of female professionals: Are women responding to skill demand? Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):450–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2000) Gender differences in pay. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):75–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bøhren Ø, Staubo S (2014) Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. J. Corporate Finance 28:152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown A, Yang F (2015) Does society underestimate women? Evidence from the performance of female jockeys in horse racing. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 111:106–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, DellaVigna S, Funk P, Iriberri N (2020) Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):269–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter ME, Franco F, Gine M (2017) Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of female risk aversion and board representation. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(2):1232–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chuprinin O, Sosyura D (2018) Family descent as a signal of managerial quality: Evidence from mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(10):3756–3820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Lit. 47(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custodio C, Ferreira MA, Matos P (2013) Generalists vs. specialists: Lifetime work experience and CEO pay. J. Financial Econom. 108(2):471–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2016) Women in the boardroom: A global perspective, 5th ed. Report, Deloitte, New York.Google Scholar
• Dezsö CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The law and economics of self-dealing. J. Financial Econ. 88(3):430–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Nygaard K, Thorburn KS (2021) Valuation effects of Norway’s board gender-quota law revisited. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4031.Link, Google Scholar
• Egan M, Matvos G, Seru A (2022) When Harry fired Sally: The double standard in punishing misconduct. J. Polit. Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falato A, Kadyrzhanova D, Lel U (2014) Distracted directors: Does board busyness hurt shareholder value? J. Financial Econom. 113(3):404–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fee CE, Hadlock CJ, Pierce JR (2013) Managers with and without style: Evidence using exogenous variation. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):567–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira D, Sah RK (2012) Who gets to the top? Generalists vs. specialists in managerial organizations. RAND J. Econom. 43(4):577–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira D, Ginglinger E, Laguna MA, Skalli Y (2021) Closing the gap: Board gender quotas and hiring practices. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogel K, Ma L, Morck R (2021) Powerful independent directors. Financial Management 50(4):935–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fracassi C, Tate G (2012) External networking and internal firm corporate governance. J. Finance 67(1):153–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis J, Huang S, Khurana I, Pereira R (2009) Does corporate transparency contribute to efficient resource allocation? J. Accounting Res. 47(4):943–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Landier A (2008) Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):49–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 188(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene D, Intintoli VJ, Kahle KM (2020) Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California Senate Bill No. 826. J. Corporate Finance 60:101526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Rustichini A (2018) What drives women out of management? The joint role of testosterone and culture. Eur. Econom. Rev. 109:221–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):96–118.Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Shivdasani A, Simintzi E (2021) Mandating women on boards: Evidence from the United States. Working paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
• Jaggers K, Marshall MG (2000) Polity IV project. Report, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
• Jenter D, Matveyev E, Roth L (2018) Good and bad CEOs. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Johnson WB, Magee RP, Nagarajan NJ, Newman HA (1985) An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1-3):151–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keloharju M, Knüpfer S, Tåg J (2022) What prevents female executives from reaching the top? Working paper, Aalto University School of Business, Espoo, Finland.Google Scholar
• Kim D, Starks LT (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):267–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleven HJ, Landais C, Søgaard JE (2019) Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(4):181–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2006) What works in securities laws? J. Finance 61(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) Law and finance. J. Polit. Econom. 106(6):1113–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen BD, Nielsen KM (2010) The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths. J. Financial Econom. 98(3):550–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Wang TY, Weisbach MS (2015) Learning about CEO ability and stock return volatility. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(6):1623–1666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1546–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rebérioux A, Roudaut G (2019) The role of rookie female directors in a post-quota period: Gender inequalities within French boards. Indust. Relations. 58(3):423–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza P, Zingales L, Maestripieri D (2009) Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(36):15268–15273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Sealy R (2016) Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Bus. Ethics Quart. 26(1):23–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terviö M (2008) The difference that CEOs make: An assignment model approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):642–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Meyerinck F, Niessen-Ruenzi A, Schmid M, Solomon S (2021) As California goes, so goes the nation? Board gender quotas and the legislation of non-economic values. Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Wolfers J (2006) Diagnosing discrimination: Stock returns and CEO gender. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 4(2/3):531–541.Crossref, Google Scholar