Choosing Competition on Behalf of Someone Else

References

• Almås I, Cappelen AW, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B(2016a) What explains the gender gap in college track dropout? Experimental and administrative evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):296–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almås I, Cappelen AW, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B(2016b) Willingness to compete: Family matters. Management Sci. 62(8):2149–2162.Link, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Bernheim BD, Ockenfels A (2021) What motivates paternalism? An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):787–830.Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Ertac S, Gneezy U, List JA, Maximiano S (2013) Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(4):1438–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apicella CL, Demiral EE, Mollerstrom J (2017) No gender difference in willingness to compete when competing against self. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):136–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2012) Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory. Sci. 335(6068):579–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2019) How uncertainty and ambiguity in tournaments affect gender differences in competitive behavior. Eur. Econom. Rev. 118(2):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Fornwagner H, Sutter M (2018) Closing the gender gap in competitiveness through priming. Nature Comm. 9(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldiga NR, Coffman KB (2018) Laboratory evidence on the effects of sponsorship on the competitive preferences of men and women. Management Sci. 64(2):888–901.Link, Google Scholar
• Berge LIO, Bjorvatn K, Pires AJG, Tungodden B (2015) Competitive in the laboratory, successful in the field? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 118:303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berlin N, Dargnies M-P (2016) Gender differences in reactions to feedback and willingness to compete. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 130:320–336.Google Scholar
• Black SE, Strahan PE (2001) The division of spoils: Rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):814–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth A, Nolen P (2012) Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(2):542–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornhorst F, Ichino A, Kirchkamp O, Schlag KH, Winter E (2010) Similarities and differences when building trust: The role of cultures. Experiment. Econom. 13(3):260–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottino E, García-Muñoz T, Kujal P (2016) Gender biases in delegation. ESI Working Paper 16-22, Economic Science Institute, Orange, CA. Accessed April 7, 2022, https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/200/.Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Groenert V, Rott C (2015) The impact of advice on women’s and men’s selection into competition. Management Sci. 61(5):1018–1035.Link, Google Scholar
• Brock JM, De Haas R (2019) Gender discrimination in small business landing. Evidence from a laboratory in-the-field experiment in Turkey (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development). Accessed April 7, 2022, https://bg.uek.krakow.pl/e-zasoby/siec_lokalna/Ebor/w232.pdf.Google Scholar
• Buser T, Geijtenbeek L, Plug E (2018) Sexual orientation, competitiveness and income. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 151:191–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2020) Can competitiveness predict education and labor market outcomes? Evidence from incentivized choice and survey measures. Preprint, submitted March 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3549354.Google Scholar
• Cadsby CB, Servátka M, Song F (2013) How competitive are female professionals? A tale of identity conflict. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 92:284–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar A, Wordofa F, Zhang YJ (2016) Competing for the benefit of offspring eliminates the gender gap in competitiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(19):5201–5205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castillo M, Petrie R (2010) Discrimination in the laboratory: Does information trump appearance? Games Econom. Behav. 68(1):50–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2012) Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):50–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Meraglia S, Sánchez Á (2020) Anticipated discrimination, choices, and performance: Experimental evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 127:103473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clain SH (2000) Gender differences in full-time self-employment. J. Econom. Bus. 52(6):499–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies M-P (2012) Men too sometimes shy away from competition: The case of team competition. Management Sci. 58(11):1982–2000.Link, Google Scholar
• Datta Gupta N, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Econom. Inquiry 51(1):816–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egan ML, Matvos G, Seru A (2017) When Harry Fired Sally: The Double Standard in Punishing Misconduct (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S (2013) Avoiding lying: The case of delegated deception. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93(C):273–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksen KW, Kvaløy O, Luzuriaga M (2020) Risk-taking on behalf of others. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 26:100283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Commission (2019) She Figures 2018. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission, Brussels).Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2020) Knowing when to ask: The cost of leaning in. J. Political Econom. 128(3):816–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fallucchi F, Quercia S (2018) Affirmative action and retaliation in experimental contests. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 156:23–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Strategic delegation: An experiment. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisk SR, Overton J (2019) Who wants to lead? Anticipated gender discrimination reduces women’s leadership ambitions. Soc. Psych. Quart. 82(3):319–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedl A, Pondorfer A, Schmidt U (2020) Gender differences in social risk taking. J. Econom. Psych. 77:1–17.Google Scholar
• Füllbrunn S, Luhan WJ, Sanfeycd A (2020) Current issues in decision making for others. J. Econom. Psych. 77:1–8.Google Scholar
• Giamattei M, Yahosseini KS, Gächter S, Molleman L (2020) Lioness laboratory: A free web-based platform for conducting interactive experiments online. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 6(1):95–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillen B, Snowberg E, Yariv L (2019) Experimenting with measurement error: Techniques with applications to the Caltech cohort study. J. Political Econom. 127(4):1826–1863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(6):1464–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamman JR, Loewenstein G, Weber RA (2010) Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal-agent relationship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1826–1846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ifcher J, Zarghamee H (2021) Do nominations close the gender gap in competition? IZA Discussion Paper No. 13852. Accessed December 10, 2021, https://docs.iza.org/dp13852.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kamas L, Preston A (2015) Can social preferences explain gender differences in economic behavior? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116:525–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessel D, Mollerstrom J, van Veldhuizen R (2021) Can simple advice eliminate the gender gap in willingness to compete? Eur. Econom. Rev. 138:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, Wang LC, Foo C (2018) Gender quotas, competitions, and peer review: Experimental evidence on the backlash against women. Management Sci. 64(8):3501–3516.Link, Google Scholar
• Mason MA, Wolfinger NH, Goulden M (2013) Do Babies Matter? Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Niederle M (2017) A gender agenda: A progress report on competitiveness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):115–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2015). Competitiveness and the gender gap among young business professionals. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP10924, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Washington, DC. Accessed April 7, 2022, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2689146.Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Wiswall M, Zafar B (2017) Preferences and biases in educational choices and labour market expectations: Shrinking the black box of gender. Econom. J. (London) 127(604):2153–2186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saccardo S, Pietrasz A, Gneezy U (2018) On the size of the gender difference in competitiveness. Management Sci. 64(4):1541–1554.Link, Google Scholar
• Sarsons H (2017) Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):141–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Weinstein MS, Lichtenstein S (1967) Sex differences in the risks a person selects for himself and the risks he selects for someone else. Res. Bull. 7(10):1–15.Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):4–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Glätzle-Rützler D (2015) Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Sci. 61(10):2339–2354.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2003) Libertarian paternalism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):175–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tungodden J, Willén A (2019) When parents decide: Gender differences in competitiveness. Accessed December 3, 2021, https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fs%2F0nxpga553on04ik%2FWhenParentsDecide_Paper_1101.pdf%3Fdl%3D0&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEymayBSf2rZCLxK9HT59Po952a7A.Google Scholar
• van Veldhuizen R (2021) Gender differences in tournament choices: Risk preferences, overconfidence or competitiveness? Accessed December 3, 2021, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B75hoVU_9nz1bkptaERaTVF1Y28/view.Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2016) The effect of feedback on gender differences in competitive choices. Preprint, submitted December 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976073.Google Scholar