Team Diversity and Incentives

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4419

References

  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
  • Arya A, Fellingham J, Glover J (1997) Teams, repeated tasks, and implicit incentives. J. Accounting Econom. 23(1):7–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldenius T, Glover J, Xue H (2016) Relational contracts with and between agents. J. Accounting Econom. 61(2–3):369–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Kreps DM (1999) Strategic Human Resources (John Wiley & Sons: New York).Google Scholar
  • Bass BM (1980) Team productivity and individual member competence. Small Group Behav. 11(4):431–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya S, Guasch J (1988) Heterogeneity, tournaments, and hierarchies. J. Political Econom. 96(4):867–881.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billingsley P (1995) Probability and Measure, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bishop JW, Mahajan A (2005) The use of teams in organizations: When a good idea isn’t and when a good idea goes bad. Laboratory Medicine 36(5):281–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bobadilla N, Gilbert P (2017) Managing scientific and technical experts in R&D: Beyond tensions, conflicting logics and orders of worth. R&D Management 47(2):223–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornes R, Hartley R (2005) Asymmetric contests with general technologies. Econom. Theory 26(4):923–946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeGroot MH (1970) Optimal Statistical Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Fang D, Noe T, Strack P (2020) Turning up the heat: The discouraging effect of competition in contests. J. Political Econom. 128(5):1940–1975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feller W (1968) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. I, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Franke J, Kanzow C, Leininger W, Schwartz A (2013) Effort maximization in asymmetric contest games with heterogeneous contestants. Econom. Theory 52(2):589–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gershkov A, Li J, Schweinzer P (2009) Efficient tournaments within teams. RAND J. Econom. 40(1):103–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gjesdal F (1982) Information and incentives: The agency information problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(3):373–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover J, Kim E (2021) Optimal team composition: Diversity to foster implicit team incentives. Management Sci. 67(9):5301–5967.Google Scholar
  • Gradstein M, Konrad KA (1999) Orchestrating rent seeking contests. Econom. J. (London) 109(458):536–545.Google Scholar
  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1983) An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica 51(1):7–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gürtler M, Gürtler O (2015) The optimality of heterogeneous tournaments. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):1007–1042.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gürtler O, Kräkel M (2010) Optimal tournament contracts for heterogeneous workers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 75(2):180–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Vidmar N (1970) Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry 33(1):37–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2012) Diversity and productivity in production teams. Adv. Econom. Anal. Participatory Labor-Managed Firms 13:99–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herbertz C, Sliwka D (2013) When higher prizes lead to lower efforts: The impact of favoritism in tournaments. Econom. Lett. 120(2):188–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Höffler F, Sliwka D (2003) Do new brooms sweep clean? When and why dismissing a manager increases the subordinates’ performance. Eur. Econom. Rev. 47(5):877–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffmann P, Hoegl M, Muethel M, Weiss M (2016) A contemporary justice perspective on dual ladders for R&D professionals. J. Production Innovation Management 33(5):589–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B (1999) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):169–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Management 33(6):987–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MK (2019) On the strategic benefits of diversity. Discussion papers in economics, School of Economics, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
  • Karlin S (1968) Total Positivity, vol. I (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Katz R, Tushman M, Allen TJ (1995) The influence of supervisory promotion and network location on subordinate careers in a dual ladder RD&E setting. Management Sci. 41(5):848–863.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim SK (1995) Efficiency of an information system in an agency model. Econometrica 63(1):89–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvaløy O, Olsen TE (2019) Relational contracts, multiple agents, and correlated outputs. Management Sci. 65(11):5360–5370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (1999) Globalization and the market for team-mates. Econom. J. (London) 109(454):C15–C40.Google Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang PJ, Rajan MV, Ray K (2008) Optimal team size and monitoring in organizations. Accounting Rev. 83(3):789–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacLeod WB (2003) Optimal contracting with subjective evaluation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):216–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malcomson JM (1984) Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. J. Political Econom. 92(3):486–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malcomson JM (1986) Rank-order contracts for a principal with many agents. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(5):807–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLaughlin KJ (1988) Aspects of tournament models: A survey. Res. Labor Econom. 9(1):225–256.Google Scholar
  • Miklos-Thal J, Ullrich H (2015) Belief precision and effort incentives in promotion contests. Econom. J. (London) 125(589):1952–1963.Google Scholar
  • Nalebuff BJ, Stiglitz JE (1983) Prizes and incentives: Toward a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J. Econom. 14(1):21–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Keeffe M, Viscusi WK, Zeckhauser RJ (1984) Economic contests: Comparative reward schemes. J. Labor Econom. 2(1):27–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Page SE (2007) Making the difference: Applying a logic of diversity. Acad. Management Perspective 21(4):6–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Potter J (2020) The ideal team size at work may be smaller than you think. Forbes (April 27), https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaimepotter/2020/04/27/the-ideal-team-size-at-work-may-be-smaller-than-you-think.Google Scholar
  • Prat A (2002) Should a team be homogeneous? Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(7):1187–1207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saavedra R, Barley PC, Van Dyne L (1993) Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psych. 78(1):61–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schotter A, Weigelt K (1992) Asymmetric tournaments, equal opportunity laws, and affirmative action: Some experimental results. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):511–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz R (2017) Is your team coordinating too much, or not enough? Harvard Bus. Rev., published on HBR blog on March 23, https://hbr.org/2017/03/is-your-team-coordinating-too-much-or-not-enough.Google Scholar
  • Slater PE (1958) Contrasting correlates of group size. Sociometry 21(2):129–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor CR, Yildirim H (2010) A unified analysis of rational voting with private values and group-specific costs. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):457–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ter Wal ALJ, Criscuolo P, Salter A (2017) Making a marriage of materials: The role of gatekeepers and shepherds in the absorption of external knowledge and innovation performance. Res. Policy 46(5):1039–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The Economist (2016) Team spirit. The Economist (March 19), https://www.economist.com/business/2016/03/19/team-spirit.Google Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organization in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Towry KL (2003) Control in a teamwork environment: The impact of social ties on the effectiveness of mutual monitoring contracts. Accounting Rev. 78(4):1069–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. Buchanan JM, Tollison RD, Tullock G, eds. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX), 97–112.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.