Pre-grant Patent Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy

References

• Aboody D, Lev B (2000) Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. J. Finance 55(6):2747–2766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Autor D, Lyle D (2004) Women, war, and wages: The effect of female labor supply on the wage structure at midcentury. J. Political Econom. 112(3):497–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amir E, Lev B (1996) Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. J. Accounting Econom. 22(1–3):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amir E, Lev B, Sougiannis T (2003) Do financial analysts get intangibles? Eur. Accounting Rev. 12(4):635–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anton JJ, Yao DA (2002) The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights, and contracting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(3):513–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (2010) Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):775–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Nelson RR, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan K, Billings MB, Kelly B, Ljungqvist A (2014) Shaping liquidity: On the causal effects of voluntary disclosure. J. Finance 69(5):2237–2278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron OE, Byard D, Kile C, Riedl EJ (2002) High‐technology intangibles and analysts’ forecasts. J. Accounting Res. 40(2):289–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartov E, Givoly D, Hayn C (2002) The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. J. Accounting Econom. 33(2):173–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baruffaldi S, Simeth M (2020) Patents and knowledge diffusion: The effect of early disclosure. Res. Policy 49(4):103927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Ritter JR (1983) Innovation and communication—Signaling with partial disclosure. Rev. Econom. Stud. 50(2):331–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw MT, Drake MS, Myers JN, Myers LA (2012) A re-examination of analysts’ superiority over time-series forecasts of annual earnings. Rev. Accounting Stud. 17(4):944–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan MJ, Jegadeesh N, Swaminathan B (1993) Investment analysis and the adjustment of stock prices to common information. Rev. Financial Stud. 6(4):799–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Martinsson G (2018) Does transparency stifle or facilitate innovation? Management Sci. 65(4):1600–1623.Link, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ, Friedman HL (2015) Disclosure standards and the sensitivity of returns to mood. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(3):787–822.Google Scholar
• Cañibano L, Garcia-Ayuso M, Sanchez P (2000) Accounting for intangibles: A literature review. J. Accounting Literature 19(1):102–130.Google Scholar
• Chen S, Matsumoto D, Rajgopal S (2011) Is silence golden? An empirical analysis of firms that stop giving quarterly earnings guidance. J. Accounting Econom. 51(1–2):134–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chondrakis G, Serrano CJ, Ziedonis RH (2021) Information disclosure and the market for acquiring technology companies. Strategic Management J. 42(5):1024–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW, Lee PM (2003) Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D. Strategic Management J. 24(2):183–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research, accessed April 20, 2019, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552.Google Scholar
• Dechow P, Ge W, Schrand C (2010) Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. J. Accounting Econom. 50(2–3):344–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal DS, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A, Yang YG (2012) Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Accounting Rev. 87(3):723–759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Sunder J, Sunder SV (2007) Measure for measure: The relation between forecast accuracy and recommendation profitability of analysts. J. Accounting Res. 45(3):567–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzoni C, Scellato G (2010) The grace period in international patent law and its effect on the timing of disclosure. Res. Policy 39(2):200–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallini NT (2002) The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(2):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Harhoff D, Verspagen B (2008) The value of European patents. Eur. Management Rev. 5(2):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Hsu DH, Stern S (2008) The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: Evidence from patent grant delays. Management Sci. 54(5):982–997.Link, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Murray FE, Stern S (2017) Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge: Intellectual property and academic publication. Res. Policy 46(4):820–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser S (2018) The effects of proprietary information on corporate disclosure and transparency: Evidence from trade secrets. J. Accounting Econom. 66(1):163–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham S, Hegde D (2015) Disclosing patents’ secrets. Sci. 347(6219):236–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu F, Lev B (2017) Time to change your investment model. Financial Anal. J. 73(4):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu F, Wang WM (2005) Intangible assets, information complexity, and analysts’ earnings forecasts. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 32(9–10):1673–1702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurun UG, Johnston R, Markov S (2015) Sell-side debt analysts and debt market efficiency. Management Sci. 62(3):682–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Wagner S (2009) The duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office. Management Sci. 55(12):1969–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Healy PM, Palepu KG (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. 31(1–3):405–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Luo H (2018) Patent publication and the market for ideas. Management Sci. 64(2):652–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Lev B, Zhu C (2018) Patent disclosure and price discovery. Preprint, submitted November 4, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274837.Google Scholar
• Hong H, Lim T, Stein JC (2000) Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. J. Finance 55(1):265–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hope OK (2003) Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts’ forecast accuracy: An international study. J. Accounting Res. 41(2):235–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houston JF, Lev B, Tucker JW (2010) To guide or not to guide? Causes and consequences of stopping quarterly earnings guidance. Contemporary Accounting Res. 27(1):143–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Laguerre TE, Leone JA (2002) Capitalization vs. expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures vs. R&D outlays. Rev. Accounting Stud. 7:355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang MH, Lundholm RJ (1996) Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. Accounting Rev. 71(4):467–492.Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B (2000) Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting (Brookings Institution Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Litov LP, Moreton P, Zenger TR (2012) Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Sci. 58(10):1797–1815.Link, Google Scholar
• Ljungqvist A, Wilhelm WJ (2003) IPO pricing in the dot-com bubble. J. Finance 58(2):723–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long C (2002) Patent signals. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 69(2):625–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lui D, Markov S, Tamayo A (2012) Equity analysts and the market’s assessment of risk. J. Accounting Res. 50(5):1287–1317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merkley KJ (2014) Narrative disclosure and earnings performance: Evidence from R&D disclosures. Accounting Rev. 89(2):725–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammadi A, Khashabi P (2020) Patent disclosure and venture financing: The impact of the American Inventor’s Protection Act on corporate venture capital investments. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 15(1):73–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piotroski JD, Roulstone DT (2004) The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry, and firm-specific information into stock prices. Accounting Rev. 79(4):1119–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IP (2017) Law and innovation: Evidence from state trade secrets laws. Rev. Econom. Stat. 99(1):167–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. George M, Constantinides M, Rene MS, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, London), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saidi F, Zaldokas A (2020) How does firms’ innovation disclosure affect their banking relationships? Management Sci. 67(2):742–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Swarup A (2008) Analyzing scientific investments. Sci. 322(5905):1266–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan H, Wang S, Welker M (2011) Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. J. Accounting Res. 49(5):1307–1357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Chamber of Commerce (2016) The Case for Enhanced Protection of Trade Secrets in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Williams HL (2017) How do patents affect research investments? NBER Working Paper No. 23088, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Womack KL (1996) Do brokerage analysts’ recommendations have investment value? J. Finance 51(1):137–167.Crossref, Google Scholar