Lost Marie Curies: Parental Impact on the Probability of Becoming an Inventor

References

• Adamic L, Filiz IO (2016) Do jobs run in families? Facebook Research Blog, accessed May 10, 2022, https://research.fb.com/blog/2016/03/do-jobs-run-in-families/?mc_cid=c904304e76&mc_eid=f46aa7b654.Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Akcigit U, Hyytinen A, Toivanen O (2018) The social origins of inventors. NBER Working Paper No. 24110, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Evans W (1998) Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):450–477.Google Scholar
• Annenkova AV, Domysheva SA (2020) Developing critical thinking skills for overcoming stereotypes in intercultural communication. Eur. Proc. Social Behav. Sci. 90:1028–1038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bau N, Fernández R (2021) The family as a social institution. NBER Working Paper No. 28918, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1991) A Treatise on the Family (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell A, Chetty R, Jaravel X, Petkova N, Van Reenen J (2019) Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 134(2):647–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Pan J (2013) The trouble with boys: Social influences and the gender gap in disruptive behavior. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(1):32–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bian L, Leslie SJ, Cimpian A (2017) Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science 355(6323):389–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM, Brummund P, Cook J, Larson-Koester M (2020) Is there still son preference in the United States? J. Population Econom. 33(3):709–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenøe AA (2021) Brothers increase women’s gender conformity. J. Populuation Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr JC, Sequeira JM (2007) Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A theory of planned behavior approach. J. Bus. Res. 60(10):1090–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Page ME, West JE (2010) Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quart. J. Econom. 125(3):1101–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers DW (1983) Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Sci. Ed. 67(2):255–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng A, Koptic K, Zamorro G (2017) Can parents’ growth mindset and role modelling address STEM gender gaps? Working paper 2017-07, Department of Education Reform, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.Google Scholar
• Chise D, Fort M, Monfardini C (2021) On the intergenerational transmission of STEM education among graduate students. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 21(1):115–145.Google Scholar
• Chopra S, Gautreau H, Khan A, Mirsafian M, Golab L (2018) Gender differences in undergraduate engineering applicants: A text mining approach. International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Raleigh, NC (International Educational Data Mining Society).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. w7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cools A, Patacchini E (2019) The brother earnings penalty. Labour Econom. 58:37–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106:1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl GB, Moretti E (2008) The demand for sons. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(4):1085–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vaan M, Stuart T (2019) Does intra-household contagion cause an increase in prescription opioid use? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(4):577–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Caprio L, Guadalupe M (2021) More women in tech? Evidence from a field experiment addressing social identity. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313(5787):665–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dossi G, Figlio D, Giuliano P, Sapienza P (2021) Born in the family: Preferences for boys and the gender gap in math. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 183:175–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger J, Dunning D (2003) How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84:5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farmer HS (1987) A multivariate model for explaining gender differences in career and achievement motivation. Edu. Res. 16(2):5–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fraioli L (2021) Gianotti: “Ora la scienza è un mestiere per donne.” La Repubblica (May 29), accessed May 10, 2022, https://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2021/05/29/news/intervista_fabiola_gianotti_direttrice_cern-303377251/.Google Scholar
• G7 Working Group on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment (2017) G7 roadmap for a gender-responsive economic environment. Accessed May 10, 2022, http://www.g7italy.it/sites/default/files/documents/Gender%20Roadmap/index.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gender Equality Index (2021) European Institute for Gender Equality. Accessed May 10, 2022, https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2020.Google Scholar
• Gould ED, Simhon A, Weinberg BA (2020) Does quality time produce quality children? Evidence on the intergenerational transmission of human capital using parental deaths. J. Labor Econom. 38(2):569–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grotevant HD (1978) Sibling constellations and sex typing of interests in adolescence. Child Development 49(2):540–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoisl K, Mariani M (2017) It’s a man’s job: Income and the gender gap in industrial research. Management Sci. 63(3):766–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Garant J-G, Herman H, Munroe DJ (2013) Why are women underrepresented amongst patentees? Res. Policy 42(4):831–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irène Joliot-Curie Facts (2021) Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2021. Accessed May 10, 2022, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1935/joliot-curie/facts/.Google Scholar
• Jensen K, Kovacs K, Sorenson O (2018) Gender differences in obtaining and maintaining patent rights. Nature Biotech. 36(4):307–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn S, Ginther D (2018) Women and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Are differences in education and careers due to stereotypes, interests, or family? Averett SL, Argys LM, Hoffman SD, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy (Oxford University Press, New York), 767–798.Google Scholar
• Kalil A, Mogstad M, Rege M, Votruba ME (2016) Father presence and the intergenerational transmission of educational attainment. J. Human Resources 51(4):869–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laband DN, Lentz BF (1983) Like father, like son: Toward an economic theory of occupational following. Southern Econom. J. 50:474–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laband DN, Lentz BF (1992) Self-recruitment in the legal profession. J. Labor Econom. 10(2):182–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavy V, Sand E (2018) On the origins of gender human capital gaps: Short and long term consequences of teachers’ stereotypical biases. J. Public Econom. 167:263–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leszczensky M, Cordes A, Kerst C, Meister T, Wespel J (2013) Bildung und Qualifikation als Grundlage der technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands (Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Marx DM, Stapel DA, Muller D (2005) We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88:432–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinn KL, Ruiz Castro M, Lingo EL (2019) Learning from mum: Cross-national evidence linking maternal employment and adult children’s outcomes. Work Employment Soc. 33(3):374–400.Google Scholar
• McGuire WJ, McGuire CV, Winton W (1979) Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one’s gender in the spontaneous self-concept. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 15(1):77–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McHale SM, Crouter AC, Tucker CJ (1999) Family context and gender role socialization in middle childhood: Comparing girls to boys and sisters to brothers. Child Development 70(4):990–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meece JL, Parsons JE, Kaczala CM, Goff SB (1982) Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psych. Bull. 91:324–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DI, Nolla KM, Eagly AH, Uttal DH (2018) The development of children’s gender‐science stereotypes: A meta‐analysis of 5 decades of US draw‐a‐scientist studies. Child Development 89(6):1943–1955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishkin E (2021) Gender and sibling dynamics in the intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 67(1):6116–6135.Link, Google Scholar
• Morgan SP, Lye DN, Condran GA (1988) Sons, daughters, and the risk of marital disruption. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(1):110–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oguzoglu U, Ozbeklik S (2016) Like father, like daughter (unless there is a son): Sibling sex composition and women’s TEM major choice in college. Discussion paper 10052, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Peter N, Lundborg P, Mikkelsen S, Webbink D (2018) The effect of a sibling’s gender on earnings and family formation. Labour Econom. 54:61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao N, Chatterjee T (2018) Sibling gender and wage differences. Appl. Econom. 50(15):1725–1745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sassenberg K, Moskowitz GB (2005) Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41(5):506–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmuck C (2017) Women in STEM Disciplines: The Yfactor 2016 Global Report on Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugimoto CR, Ni C, West JD, Lariviére V (2015) The academic advantage: Gender disparities in patenting. PLoS One 10(5):e0128000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toivanen O, Väänänen L (2016) Education and invention. Rev. Econom. Statist. 98(2):382–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wetzels C, Zorlu A (2003) Wage effects of motherhood: A double selection approach. Accessed May 10, 2022, http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/11433.Google Scholar