Optimal Matchmaking Strategy in Two-Sided Marketplaces

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Che YK, Yasuda Y (2015) Expanding “choice” in school choice. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 7(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y (2021) Managing congestion in matching markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):620–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Braverman M, Kanoria Y, Shi P (2020) Clearing matching markets efficiently: Informative signals and match recommendations. Management Sci. 66(5):2163–2193.Link, Google Scholar
• Avery C, Jolls C, Posner RA, Roth AE (2001) The market for federal judicial law clerks. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 68(3):793–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Yossef Z, Jayram TS, Kumar R, Sivakumar D (2004) An information statistics approach to data stream and communication complexity. J. Comput. System Sci. 68(4):702–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas DP (1988) The auction algorithm: A distributed relaxation method for the assignment problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 14(1):105–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braverman M (2015) Interactive information complexity. SIAM J. Comput. 44(6):1698–1739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou JH, Lu CJ (2010) Communication requirements for stable marriages. Calamoneri T, Diaz J, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Algorithms Complexity (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 371–382.Google Scholar
• Coles P, Kushnir A, Niederle M (2013) Preference signaling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 5(2):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles P, Cawley J, Levine PB, Niederle M, Roth AE, Siegfried JJ (2010) The job market for new economists: A market design perspective. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(4):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cover TM, Thomas JA (2012) Elements of Information Theory (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Demange G, Gale D, Sotomayor M (1986) Multi-item auctions. J. Political Econom. 94(4):863–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdös P, Rényi A (1964) On random matrices. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci 8(A):454–460.Google Scholar
• Fradkin A (2017) Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: Evidence from Airbnb. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley LL (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonczarowski YA, Nisan N, Ostrovsky R, Rosenbaum W (2015) A stable marriage requires communication. Proc. Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM), 1003–1017.Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yildirim P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2017) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2019) Buyer uncertainty about seller capacity: Causes, consequences, and a partial solution. Management Sci. 65(8):3518–3540.Link, Google Scholar
• Jagadeesan M, Wei A (2018) Varying the number of signals in matching markets. Christodoulou G, Harks T, eds. Web and Internet Economics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 232–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Management Sci. 67(10):5969–6627.Google Scholar
• Kushilevitz E, Nisan N (2006) Communication Complexity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Lee S, Niederle M (2015) Propose with a rose? Signaling in Internet dating markets. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):731–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Netessine S (2020) Higher market thickness reduces matching rate in online platforms: Evidence from a quasiexperiment. Management Sci. 66(1):271–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Newton C (2014) TaskRabbit is blowing up its business model and becoming the Uber for everything. The Verge (June 17), https://www.theverge.com/2014/6/17/5816254/taskrabbit-blows-up-its-auction-house-to-offer-services-on-demand.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2008) What have we learned from market design? Econom. J. 118(527):285–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sotomayor O (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Xing X (1997) Turnaround time and bottlenecks in market clearing: Decentralized matching in the market for clinical psychologists. J. Political Econom. 105(2):284–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal I (2007) The communication requirements of social choice rules and supporting budget sets. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):341–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapley LS, Shubik M (1971) The assignment game I: The core. Internat. J. Game Theory 1(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi P (2022) Optimal match recommendations in two-sided marketplaces with endogenous prices. Preprint, submitted February 14, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4034950.Google Scholar
• Shieber J (2018) How did Thumbtack win the on-demand services market? By being the everything store. Tech Crunch (May 5), https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/05/how-did-thumbtack-win-the-on-demand-services-market/.Google Scholar
• Wu Y (2020) Yelp reinvents the hiring experience for home and local services. Yelp Official Blog (August 18), https://blog.yelp.com/2020/08/yelp-reinvents-the-hiring-experience-for-home-and-local-services.Google Scholar