The Hidden Costs of Securing Innovation: The Manifold Impacts of Compulsory Invention Secrecy

References

• Alcácer J, Gittelman M, Sampat BN (2009) Applicant and examiner citations in US patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy 38(2):415–427.Google Scholar
• American Bar Association (ABA) (2012) Response to request for comments on the feasibility of placing economically significant patents under a secrecy order and the need to review criteria used in determining secrecy orders related to national security, 77 Federal Regulation 23662, Chicago, IL (April 20).Google Scholar
• American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) (2012) Response to request for comments on the feasibility of placing economically significant patents under a secrecy order and the need to review criteria used in determining secrecy orders related to national security, 77 Federal Regulation 23662, Arlington, VA (April 20).Google Scholar
• Beckler DZ (1944) Question as to desirability of continuing examination of patent applications by a member of the OSRD Liaison Office. Memorandum from David Z. Beckler to Francis S. Cooper (February 10). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the OSRD, RG 227, NC-138 Entry 13, Box 68.Google Scholar
• Biasi B, Moser P (2021) Effects of copyrights on science: Evidence from the WWII book republication program. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13:218–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush V (1945) Letter to Casper W. Ooms. Letter from Vannevar Bush to Casper W. Ooms (August 21). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the OSRD, RG 227, NC-138 Entry 13, Box 68.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cotropia CA, Lemley MA, Sampat BN (2013) Do applicant patent citations matter? Res. Policy 42(4):844–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Rassenfosse G, Pellegrino G, Raiteri E (2020) Do patents enable disclosure? Evidence from the Invention Secrecy Act. Working paper, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Devlin A (2010) The misunderstood function of disclosure in patent law. Harvard J. Law Tech. 23(2):401–446.Google Scholar
• Donnelly AE (1942) J. Patent Office Soc. 24(June):511.Google Scholar
• Federation of American Scientists (FAS) (2018) Invention secrecy activity. https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/invention/stats.html.Google Scholar
• Fenning K (1940) Patents and national defense. J. Patent Office Soc. 22:869–884.Google Scholar
• Fromer JC (2009) Patent disclosure. Iowa Law Rev. 94:539–606.Google Scholar
• Furman J, Nagler M, Watzinger M (2021) Disclosure and subsequent innovation: Evidence from the patent depository library program. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 13:239–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Schankerman M (2015) Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. Quart. J. Econom. 130:317–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham S, Hegde D (2015) Disclosing patents’ secrets. Science 347:236–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffiths AW (1942) Memorandum to the London Office. Memorandum from A. W. Griffiths to the OSRD London Office concerning the preservation of invention secrecy (December 9). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the OSRD, RG 227, NC-138 Entry 13, Box 68.Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Sampat BN (2020) Inventing the endless frontier: The effects of the World War II research effort on post-war innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 27375, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Herkenhoff K, Zhu C (2022) Patent publication and innovation. NBER Working Paper 29770, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Iaria A, Schwarz C, Waldinger F (2018) Frontier knowledge and scientific production: Evidence from the collapse of international science. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):927–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) (2012) Response to request for comments on the feasibility of placing economically significant patents under a secrecy order and the need to review criteria used in determining secrecy orders related to national security, 77 Federal Regulation 23662, Washington, DC (April 20).Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 3:783–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marco AC, Carley M, Jackson S, Myers A (2015) The USPTO historical patent data files: Two centuries of innovation. Preprint, submitted June 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2616724.Google Scholar
• Moore WC (1945) Meeting of the patent office advisory committee. Letter from William Cabler Moore to D. B. Keyes (September 5). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the War Production Board RG 179, UD Entry 5, Box 1.Google Scholar
• Moreland EL (1943) Letter to J. R. Killian. Letter from E. L. Moreland to James R. Killian, Jr., President of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (July 3). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the OSRD, RG 227, NC-138 Entry 13, Box 68.Google Scholar
• Moser P, Voena A (2012) Compulsory licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102:396–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moser P, Ohmstedt J, Rhode PW (2017) Patent citations—An analysis of quality differences and citing practices in hybrid corn. Management Sci. 64(4):1926–1940.Link, Google Scholar
• Moser P, Voena A, Waldinger F (2014) German Jewish emigrés and U.S. invention. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104:3222–3255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Office of War Information (OWI) (1945) U.S. Government Manual, 1st ed. (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouellette LL (2012) Do patents disclose useful information? Harvard J. Law Tech. 25:545–607.Google Scholar
• Pechenick EA, Danforth CM, Dodds PS (2015) Characterizing the Google Books corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLoS One 10(10):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IPL (2017) Secrecy and patents: Theory and evidence from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Strategy Sci. 2(3):176–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Roin BN (2005) The disclosure function of the patent system (or lack thereof). Harvard Law Rev. 118:2007–2028.Google Scholar
• Sampat BN (2010) When do applicants search for prior art? J. Law Econom. 53(2):399–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampat B, Williams HL (2019) How do patents affect follow-on innovation? Evidence from the human genome. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109:203–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart I (1943) Form letter. Letter from Irvin Stewart to unspecified recipient(s) (October 9). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the OSRD, RG 227, NC-138 Entry 13, Box 68.Google Scholar
• Stoutenburgh PP (1945) Coordination of rescission of secrecy orders with British release of information. Letter from Paul P. Stoutenburgh to Vannevar Bush (April 27). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the OSRD, RG 227, NC-138 Entry 13, Box 68.Google Scholar
• Streifer B (2017) U.S. Department of Energy list of U.S. patents related to the Manhattan Project. Obtained via FOIA request by Bill Streifer and available at the Wilson Center History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/165247.Google Scholar
• United States Army Office of the Judge Advocate General (JAG) (1945) Legal work of the War Department, July 1, 1940–March 31, 1945: A history of the judge advocate general’s department. Available at http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/Legal-Work_War-Department.pdf.Google Scholar
• United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (2012) Notice of request for comments on the feasibility of placing economically significant patents under a secrecy order and the need to review criteria used in determining secrecy orders related to national security. 77 Federal Regulation 23662 (April 20).Google Scholar
• U.S. House Committee on Government Operations (1980) The government’s classification of private ideas. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, United States House of Representatives, 96th Congress, Second Session.Google Scholar
• U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) (1958) Nonconventional Scientific and Technical Information Systems in Current Use (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) (1944) Administrative Circular 10 (Patents). Enclosure to letter from Irvin Stewart of the OSRD to Colonel F. H. Vanderwerker of the Army and Navy Patent Advisory Board (April 27). Available from the National Archives and Records Administration: Records of the Office of the Judge Advocate General (Army), RG 153, A1 Entry 1029.Google Scholar
• Williams HL (2013) Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome. J. Political Econom. 121:1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar