Proximity and the Management of Innovation

References

• Adler PS, Chen CX (2011) Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting Organ. Soc. 36(2):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Tirole J (1994) The management of innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):1185–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein JC (2008) Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akcigit U, Baslandze S, Stantcheva S (2016) Taxation and the international mobility of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(10):2930–2981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen MR, Adomdza GK, Meyer MH (2015) Managing for innovation: Managerial control and employee level outcomes. J. Bus. Res. 68(2):371–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1):123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Management 40(5):1297–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong C, Glaeser S, Park SY (2021) Intellectual property rights, holdup, and the incentives for innovation disclosure. Preprint, submitted January 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724041.Google Scholar
• Armstrong CS, Glaeser S, Huang S, Taylor DJ (2019) The economics of managerial taxes and corporate risk-taking. Accounting Rev. 94(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens GW (2022) Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption. J. Econometrics 226(1):62–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2713–2739.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker NR, Freeland JR (1972) Structuring information flow to enhance innovation. Management Sci. 19(1):105–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker A, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Econom. Stud. 144(2):370–395.Google Scholar
• Barrios JM (2021) Staggeringly problematic: A primer on staggered DiD for accounting researchers. Preprint, submitted March 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3794859.Google Scholar
• Barsh J, Capozzi MM, Davidson J (2008) Leadership and innovation. McKinsey Quart. 1:37–47.Google Scholar
• Bedford DS (2015) Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Account. Res. 28:12–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell A, Chetty R, Jaravel X, Petkova N, Van Reenen J (2019) Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 134(2):647–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare MF, Wichman CJ (2020) Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 82(1):50–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, DeYoung R (2001) The effects of geographic expansion on bank efficiency. J. Financial Service Res. 19(2):163–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend RR (2016) The impact of venture capital monitoring. J. Finance 71(4):1591–1622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbidge JB, Magee L, Robb AL (1988) Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):123–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ, Gerakos J, Lee LF (2018) Corporate jets and private meetings with investors. J. Accounting Econom. 65(2-3):358–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D, Datar SM, Sandino T (2009) Organizational design and control across multiple markets: The case of franchising in the convenience store industry. Accounting Rev. 84(6):1749–1779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D, Epstein MJ, Martinez-Jerez FA (2011) The learning effects of monitoring. Accounting Rev. 86(6):1909–1934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Link, Google Scholar
• Catalini C, Fons-Rosen C, Gaulé P (2020) How do travel costs shape collaboration? Management Sci. 66(8):3340–3360.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran A, Linderman K, Schroeder R (2015) The role of project and organizational context in managing high‐tech R&D projects. Production Oper. Management 24(4):560–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chenhall RH, Kallunki JP, Silvola H (2011) Exploring the relationships between strategy, innovation, and management control systems: The roles of social networking, organic innovative culture, and formal controls. J. Management Accounting Res. 23(1):99–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correia S (2015) Singletons, cluster-robust standard errors and fixed effects: A bad mix. Technical report, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Cronin M, Erkens DH, Schloetzer JD, Tinsley CH (2021) How controlling failure perceptions affects performance: Evidence from a field experiment. Accounting Rev. 96(2):205–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Chaisemartin C, d’Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detzen N (2021) The effect of enabling and coercive control on motivation in R&D projects. Working paper, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Dey A, White JT (2021) Labor mobility and antitakeover provisions. J. Accounting Econom. 71(2-3):101388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer T, Glaeser S, Lang MH, Sprecher C (2020) The effect of patent disclosure quality on innovation. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3711128.Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Greene H, Li G, Marx M, Yao D (2019) Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science 364(6446):1139–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fly Aeolus Business Flight Travel Survey (2017) Accessed June 1, 2022, https://flyaeolus.com/blog/2017-business-travel-statistics/.Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Owen-Smith J (2017) A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Sci. 63(3):791–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giroud X (2013) Proximity and investment: Evidence from plant-level data. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):861–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser S (2018) The effects of proprietary information on corporate disclosure and transparency: Evidence from trade secrets. J. Accounting Econom. 66(1):163–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser S, Guay WR (2017) Identification and generalizability in accounting research: A discussion of Christensen, Floyd, Liu, and Maffett (2017). J. Accounting Econom. 64(2-3):305–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser CK, Fisher M, Su X (2019) Optimal retail location: Empirical methodology and application to practice: Finalist–2017 M&SOM practice-based research competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):86–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Glaeser S, Michels J, Verrecchia RE (2020) Discretionary disclosure and manager horizon: Evidence from patenting. Rev. Accounting Stud. 25(2):597–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A (1998) Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers? Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):298–302.Google Scholar
• Grabner I, Posh A, Wabnegg M (2018) Materializing innovation capability: A management control perspective. J. Management Accounting Res. 30(2):163–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabner I, Seiter M, Wabnegg M, Wirth H (2020) How to mitigate the loss of creative talent: A multilevel management control perspective. Working paper, WU Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey part 2. Working Paper No. 3301, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gschwantner S, Hiebl MR (2016) Management control systems and organizational ambidexterity. J. Management Control 27(4):371–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Heese J, Pérez-Cavazos G (2020) When the boss comes to town: The effects of headquarters’ visits on facility-level misconduct. Accounting Rev. 95(6):235–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchison‐Krupat J, Chao RO (2014) Tolerance for failure and incentives for collaborative innovation. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1265–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings J, Lee J, Matsumoto DA (2017) The effect of industry co-location on analysts’ information acquisition costs. Accounting Rev. 92(6):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson NL (1949) Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 36(1/2):149–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier SJ, Wang LW, Williamson MG (2019) Incentivizing the creative process: From initial quantity to eventual creativity. Accounting Rev. 94(2):249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Koh PS, Reeb DM (2015) Missing R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 60(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Laguerre TE, Leone AJ (2002) Capitalization vs. expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures vs. R&D outlays. Rev. Accounting Stud. 7(4):355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kowaleski ZT, Sutherland A, Vetter F (2020) Supervisor informal authority and employee financial misconduct. Preprint, submitted July 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646617.Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 21(1):107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu A, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberti JM, Petersen MA (2019) Information: Hard and soft. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 8(1):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lund L (1986) Locating Corporate R&D Facilities (Conference Board, New York).Google Scholar
• Machlup F (1962) The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, vol. 278 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy IP, Gordon BR (2011) Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: A management control system approach. Res. Management 41(3):240–258.Google Scholar
• Melo MT, Nickel S, Saldanha-Da-Gama F (2009) Facility location and supply chain management–A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196(2):401–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menguc B, Auh S (2008) The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity-firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Indust. Marketing Management 37(4):455–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moretti E, Wilson DJ (2017) The effect of state taxes on the geographical location of top earners: Evidence from star scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(7):1858–1903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen SH, Daskin MS (1998) Strategic facility location: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111(3):423–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IP (2019) US R&D, 1975–1998: A new data set. Strategic Management J. 40(5):715–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PwC (2017) Connectivity and growth. Accessed June 1, 2022, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/assets/connectivity-and-growth-2017-edition.pdf.Google Scholar
• Robinson DT (2008) Strategic alliances and the boundaries of the firm. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2):649–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5, Part 2):S71–S102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (2000) Should the government subsidize supply or demand in the market for scientists and engineers? Innovation Policy Econom. 1:221–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubera G, Kirca AH (2012) Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Marketing 76(3):130–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Cohen WM (2010) What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Sci. 56(12):2134–2153.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Acad. Management J. 46(6):703–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder LV (2006) Facility location under uncertainty: A review. IIE Trans. 38(7):547–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Speckbacher G (2017) Creativity research in management accounting: A commentary. J. Management Accounting Res. 29(3):49–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (2002) Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized vs. hierarchical firms. J. Finance 57(5):1891–1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker B, Halkett I, James A (2021) Necessity: The mother of invention? The tension between management control and creativity: Lessons from Apollo 13. J. Management Accounting Res. 33(3):163–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wabnegg M (2021) Performance evaluation for R&D-employees: The drawbacks of nonfinancial measures and how to mitigate them. Working paper, WU Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
• Wang N, Hagedoorn J (2014) The lag structure of the relationship between patenting and internal R&D revisited. Res. Policy 43(8):1275–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weed J (2018) More than cutting costs: Travel managers now consider employee comfort. New York Times (August 6), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/06/business/corporate-travel-employee-comfort.html.Google Scholar
• Wilson DJ (2009) Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state, out-of-state, and aggregate effects of R&D tax credits. Rev. Econom. Statist. 91(2):431–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Kolk B, van Veen-Dirks PM, ter Bogt HJ (2020) How combinations of control elements create tensions and how these can be managed: An embedded case study. Management Accounting Res. 48:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Reenen J (2021) Innovation and human capital policy. NBER Working Paper No. 28713, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Vincenty T (1975) Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey Rev. 23(176):88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J (2003) When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):413–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zumbrun J (2016) The rise of knowledge workers is accelerating despite the threat of automation. Wallstreet Journal (May 4), https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-REB-35617. http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/05/04/the-rise-of-knowledge-workersis-accelerating-despite-the-threat-of-automation/.Google Scholar