High-Low Promotion Policies for Peak-End Demand Models

References

• Adida E, Özer Ö (2019) Why markdown as a pricing modality? Management Sci. 65(5):2161–2178.Google Scholar
• Ahn H-s, Gümüş M, Kaminsky P (2007) Pricing and manufacturing decisions when demand is a function of prices in multiple periods. Oper. Res. 55(6):1039–1057.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: The confounding effect of price response heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. 19(2):185–200.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellman R (1957) Dynamic Programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Lobel I (2015) Intertemporal price discrimination: Structure and computation of optimal policies. Management Sci. 61(1):92–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Neslin SA (1990) Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Briesch R, Fox EJ (1995) How promotions work. Marketing Sci. 14(3):122–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Briesch RA, Krishnamurthi L, Mazumdar T, Raj SP (1997) A comparative analysis of reference price models. J. Consumer Res. 24(2):202–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Hu P, Hu Z (2016) Efficient algorithms for the dynamic pricing problem with reference price effect. Manage. Sci. 63(12):4389–4408.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Perakis G (2020) Optimizing promotions for multiple items in supermarkets. Ray S, Yin S, eds. Channel Strategies and Marketing Mix in a Connected World, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 9 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 71–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Gupta S, Kalas J, Perakis G (2016) An efficient algorithm for dynamic pricing using a graphical representation. Preprint, submitted April 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2772231.Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Leung N-HZ, Panchamgam K, Perakis G, Smith A (2017) The impact of linear optimization on promotion planning. Oper. Res. 65(2):446–468.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen-Hillel T, Panchamgam K, Perakis G (2020a) Bounded memory peak end models can be surprisingly good. Working paper, UBC Sauder School of Business, Vancouver.Google Scholar
• Cohen-Hillel T, Perakis G, Spantidakis I, Thayaparan LPG (2020b) Joint fulfillment and replenishment in omni-channel. Personal communication, April 29, 2022.Google Scholar
• Corsten D, Gruen TW (2004) Stock-outs cause walkouts. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(5):26–28.Google Scholar
• Dickson PR, Sawyer AG (1990) The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing 54(3):42–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg ASC, Hammond K, Goodhart GJ (1994) The after-effects of price-related consumer promotions. J. Advertising Res. 34(4):11–22.Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W, Keskinocak P (2003) Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: Research overview, current practices, and future directions. Management Sci. 49(10):1287–1309.Link, Google Scholar
• Garey MR, Johnson DS (2002) A series of books in the mathematical sciences. Computers and Intractability, vol. 29 (W. H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Griswold M (2011) Improving on-shelf availability for retail supply chains requires the balance of process and technology. Discussion paper, Gartner, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
• Hill R (2016) Promotions: Do you know what you don’t know? Discussion paper, Kantar Worldpanel, London.Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Dreze X, Purk ME (1994) EDLP, Hi-Lo, and margin arithmetic. J. Marketing 58(4):16–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Nasiry J (2017) Are markets with loss-averse consumers more sensitive to losses? Management Sci. 64(3):1384–1395.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Fredrickson BL, Schreiber CA, Redelmeier DA (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psych. Sci. 4(6):401–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalwani MU, Yim CK, Rinne HJ, Sugita Y (1990) A price expectations model of customer brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 27(3):251–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopalle PK, Mela CF, Marsh L (1999) The dynamic effect of discounting on sales: Empirical analysis and normative pricing implications. Marketing Sci. 18(3):317–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Kopalle PK, Rao AG, Assuncao JL (1996) Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. 15(1):60–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Kristofferson K, McFerran B, Morales AC, Dahl DW (2016) The dark side of scarcity promotions: How exposure to limited-quantity promotions can induce aggression. J. Consumer Res. 43(5):683–706.Google Scholar
• Macé S, Neslin SA (2004) The determinants of pre-and postpromotion dips in sales of frequently purchased goods. J. Marketing Res. 41(3):339–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magazine MJ, Oguz O (1981) A fully polynomial approximation algorithm for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 8(3):270–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I (2005) Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing 69(4):84–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nasiry J, Popescu I (2011) Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6):1361–1368.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Phillips R (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popescu I, Wu Y (2007) Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Rajendran KN, Tellis GJ (1994) Contextual and temporal components of reference price. J. Marketing 58(1):22–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X (2007) Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior. Management Sci. 53(5):726–741.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, Van Ryzin GJ (2006) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 68 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Vazirani VV (2013) Approximation Algorithms (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Google Scholar