A Reexamination of the Impact of Decision Conflict on Choice Deferral

References

• Botti S, Iyengar SS (2006) The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfare. J. Public Policy Marketing 25:24–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R (1997) Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J. Consumer Res. 24:215–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evangelidis I, Levav J (2013) Prominence vs. dominance: How relationships between alternatives drive decision strategy and choice. J. Marketing Res. 50:753–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evangelidis I, Levav J, Simonson I (2018) The asymmetric impact of context on advantaged vs. disadvantaged options. J. Marketing Res. 55:239–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer GW, Carmon Z, Ariely D, Zauberman G (1999) Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Sci. 45:1057–1075.Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hsee CK (1996) The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67:247–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Leclerc F (1998) Will products look more attractive when presented separately or together? J. Consumer Res. 25:175–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Loewenstein GF, Blount S, Bazerman MH (1999) Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluation of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychol. Bull. 125:576–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL, Mann L (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1933) Vectors, cognitive processes, and Mr. Tolman’s criticism. J. Gen. Psychol. 8:318–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce MF (1998) Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. J. Consumer Res. 24:409–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller NE (1944) Experimental studies of conflict. Hunt JM, ed. Personality and the Behavior Disorders (Ronald Press, Oxford, England), 431–465.Google Scholar
• Mochon D (2013) Single-option aversion. J. Consumer Res. 40:555–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49:11–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psych. Sci. 22:1359–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2018) False-positive citations. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 13:255–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Simonsohn U (2017) Power posing: P-curving the evidence. Psych. Sci. 28:687–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP (2014) P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. J. Exp. Psych. Gen. 143:534–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Simmons JP, Nelson LD (2015) Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious p-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). J. Exp. Psych. Gen. 144:1146–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16:158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Shafir E (1992) Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Sci. 3:358–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Sattath S, Slovic P (1988) Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. 95:371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar