Tick Size, Trading Strategies, and Market Quality

References

• Angel JJ (1997) Tick size, share prices, and stock splits. J. Finance 52(2):655–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H (2003) Trade execution costs and market quality after decimalization. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 38(4):747–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buti S, Rindi B, Werner IM (2017) Dark pool trading strategies, market quality and welfare. J. Financial Econom. 124(2):244–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colliard J-E, Foucault T (2012) Trading fees and efficiency in limit order markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(11):3389–3421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comerton-Forde C, Gregoire V, Zhong Z (2019) Inverted fee structures, tick size, and market quality. J. Financial Econom. 134(1):141–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordella T, Foucault T (1999) Minimum price variations, time priority and quote dynamics. J. Financial Intermediation 8(3):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse (2014) The TSE tick size reduction phase I—a month in review. Trading Strategy 8:141–173.Google Scholar
• Degryse H, Van Achter M, Wuyts G (2009) Dynamic order submission strategies with competition between a dealer market and a crossing network. J. Financial Econom. 91(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyhrberg AH, Foley S, Svec J (2018) When bigger is better: The impact of a tiny tick size on undercutting behavior. Preprint, submitted June 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3194932.Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Kadan O, Kandel E (2005) Limit order book as a market for liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1171–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Securities and Markets Authority (2018) Amendment to commission delegated regulation. Consultation paper 2017/588 (RTS 11), http://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma70-156-357_cp_on_amendments_to_rts_11.pdf.Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Parlour C, Rajan U (2005) Equilibrium in a dynamic limit order market. J. Finance 60(5):2149–2190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein MA, Kavajecz KA (2000) Eighths, sixteenths, and the market depth: Changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE. J. Financial Econom. 56(1):125–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gormley TA, Matsa DA (2011) Growing out of trouble? Corporate responses to liability risk. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(8):2781–2821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris L (1994) Minimum price variations, discrete bid-ask spreads and quotation sizes. Rev. Financial Stud. 7(1):149–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadan O (2006) So, who gains from a small tick size? J. Financial Intermediation 15(1):32–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Hara M, Ye M (2011) Is market fragmentation harming market quality? J. Financial Econom. 100(3):459–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panayides M, Rindi B, Werner IM (2017) Trading fees and intermarket competition. Preprint, submitted April 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2954512.Google Scholar
• Parlour C (1998) Price dynamics in limit order markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 11(4):789–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riccò R, Rindi B, Seppi DJ (2020) Information, liquidity and dynamic limit order markets. Working Paper No. 660, IGIER, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
• Riccò R, Rindi B, Seppi DJ (2021) Optimal market access pricing. Working Paper No. 675, IGIER, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
• Rindi B, Werner IM (2019) U.S. tick size pilot. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
• Seppi DJ (1997) Liquidity provision with limit orders and a strategic specialist. Rev. Financial Stud. 10(1):103–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu H (2014) Do dark pools harm price discovery? Rev. Financial Stud. 27(3):747–789.Crossref, Google Scholar