Thy Neighbor’s Vote: Peer Effects in Proxy Voting

References

• Aggarwal R, Erel I, Ferreira M, Matos P (2011) Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 100(1):154–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Mandelker GN (1990) Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 25(2):143–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern K, Ran D, Shumway T (2014) Peer effects in risk aversion and trust. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(11):3213–3240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander C, Chen M, Seppi D, Spatt C (2010) Interim news and the role of proxy voting advice. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(12):4419–4454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almazan A, Hartzell JC, Starks LT (2005) Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation. Financial Management 34(4):5–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appel I, Gormley TA, Keim DB (2016) Passive investors, not passive owners. J. Financial Econom. 121(1):111–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appel I, Gormley TA, Keim DB (2018) Standing on the shoulders of giants: The effect of passive investors on activism. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(7):2720–2774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf R, Jayaraman N, Ryan HE (2012) Do pension-related business ties influence mutual fund proxy voting? Evidence from shareholder proposals on executive compensation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 47(3):567–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bach L, Metzger D (2019) How close are close shareholder votes? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(8):3183–3214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baik B, Kang J-K, Kim J-M (2010) Local institutional investors, information asymmetries, and equity returns. J. Financial Econom. 97(1):81–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker B, Ivković Z, Weisbenner S (2011) Local dividend clienteles. J. Finance 66(2):655–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomberg (2016) Vanguard, BlackRock seen seldom challenging CEO pay plans. (February 17). Accessed April 20, 2020, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-17/vanguard-blackrock-seen-seldom-challenging-companies-on-ceo-pay?sref=2CZ87tj2.Google Scholar
• Bloomberg (2019) BlackRock, Vanguard face shareholder rebuke over climate votes. (December 13). Accessed April 20, 2020, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-13/blackrock-vanguard-face-shareholder-rebuke-over-climate-votes?sref=2CZ87tj2.Google Scholar
• Brickley JA, Lease RC, Smith CW Jr (1988) Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. J. Financial Econom. 20(1–2):267–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J, Ivković Z, Smith P, Weisbenner S (2008) Neighbors matter: Causal community effects and stock market participation. J. Finance 63(3):1509–1531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler AW, Gurun U (2012) Educational networks, mutual fund voting patterns, and CEO compensation. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2533–2562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calluzzo P, Kedia S (2019) Mutual fund board connections and proxy voting. J. Financial Econom. 134(3):669–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao J, Liang H, Zhan X (2019) Peer effects of corporate social responsibility. Management Sci. 65(12):5487–5503.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Harford J, Li K (2007) Monitoring: Which institutions matter? J. Financial Econom. 86(2):279–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54(6):2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (2001) The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. J. Political Econom. 109(4):811–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuñat V, Gine M, Guadalupe M (2012) The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. J. Finance 67(5):1943–1977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvijanović D, Dasgupta A, Zachariadis K (2016) Ties that bind: How business connections affect mutual fund activism. J. Finance 71(6):2933–2966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Grinblatt M, Titman S, Wermers R (1997) Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks, J. Finance 52:1035–1058.Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Kim EH (2007) Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. J. Financial Econom. 85(2):552–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Guercio D, Hawkins J (1999) The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. J. Financial Econom. 52(3):293–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Gerken WC, Graham NP (2018a) Is fraud contagious? Co-worker influence on misconduct by financial advisors. J. Finance 73(1):1417–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Gerken WC, Ivković Z, Weisbenner S (2018b) Capital gains lock-in and governance choices. J. Financial Econom. 127(3):113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougal C, Parsons CA, Titman S (2015) Urban vibrancy and corporate growth. J. Finance 70(1):163–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2016) BlackRock slammed over too many votes for high pay. (May 22).Google Scholar
• Fortune (2016) Overpaid CEOs are being supported by mutual funds. (February 18).Google Scholar
• Gaspar J-M, Massa M, Matos P (2005) Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. J. Financial Econom. 76(1):153–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillan SL, Starks LT (2000) Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 57(2):275–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giroud X (2013) Proximity and investment: Evidence from plant-level data. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):861–915.Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Sacerdote B, Scheinkman J (2003) The social multiplier. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(2-3):345–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2001) How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance 56(3):1053–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harford J, Jenter D, Li K (2011) Institutional cross-holdings and their effect on acquisition decisions. J. Financial Econom. 99(1):27–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Huang J, Zhao S (2019) Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership. J. Financial Econom. 134(2):400–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik J, Stein JC (2005) Thy neighbor’s portfolio: Word-of-mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers. J. Finance 60(6):2801–2824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huson M, Parrino R, Starks LT (2001) Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. J. Finance 56(6):2265–2297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P, Lowry M (2015) Are mutual funds active voters? Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12):446–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P, Kalodimos J, Lowry M (2021) Investors’ attention to corporate governance. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(2):5581–5628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivković Z, Weisbenner S (2005) Local does as local is: Information content of the geography of individual investors’ common stock investments. J. Finance 60(1):267–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivković Z, Weisbenner S (2007) Information diffusion effects in individual investors’ common stock purchases: Covet thy neighbors’ investment choices. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(4):1327–1357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kling JR, Ludwig J, Katz LF (2005) Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: Evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 120(1):87–130.Google Scholar
• Lee AH (2021) Every vote counts: The importance of fund voting and disclosure. Speech at the 2021 ICI Mutual Funds and Investment Management Conference. Accessed April 20, 2020, https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/lee-every-vote-counts.Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1995) Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. J. Finance 50(1):301–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2013) With a little help from my (random) friends: Success and failure in post-business school entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(10):2411–2452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malenko N, Shen Y (2016) The role of proxy advisory firms: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(12):3394–3427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malloy CJ (2005) The geography of equity analysis. J. Finance 60(2):719–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matvos G, Ostrovsky M (2008) Cross-ownership, returns, and voting in mergers. J. Financial Econom. 89(3):391–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matvos G, Ostrovsky M (2010) Heterogeneity and peer effects in mutual fund proxy voting. J. Financial Econom. 98(1):90–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(2):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Testing for manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design. J. Econometrics 142(6):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mian A (2006) Distance constraints: The limits of foreign lending in poor economies. J. Finance 61(3):1465–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrow Sadali (2018) Institutional Investor Survey 2018. Accessed April 20, 2020, https://morrowsodali.com/news-events/articles/institutional-investor-survey-2018.Google Scholar
• New York Times (2005) Potluck à la Wall Street: ‘Idea dinners.’ (May 24).Google Scholar
• New York Times (2016a) BlackRock wields its big stick like a wet noodle on C.E.O. pay. (April 15).Google Scholar
• New York Times (2016b) Your mutual fund has your proxy, like it or not (September 23).Google Scholar
• Parrino R, Sias RW, Starks LT (2003) Voting with their feet: Institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. J. Financial Econom. 68(1):3–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons CA, Sulaeman J, Titman S (2018) The geography of financial misconduct. J. Finance 73(5):2087–2137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. J. Finance 57(6):2533–2570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pool VK, Stoffman N, Yonker SE (2015) The people in your neighborhood: Social interactions and mutual fund portfolios. J. Finance 70(6):2679–2732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin KH (2013) Examining the market power and impact of proxy advisory firms. Written statement to Committee on Financial Services United States House of Representatives. Accessed April 20, 2020, https://www.glasslewis.com/examining-the-market-power-and-impact-of-proxy-advisory-firms/.Google Scholar
• Reuters (2016) Investors want mutual funds to get tougher on CEO pay: Reuters/Ipsos poll. (April 27). Accessed April 20, 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ceopay-investors/investors-want-mutual-funds-to-get-tougher-on-ceo-pay-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKCN0XO0A0.Google Scholar
• Shue K (2013) Executive networks and firm policies: Evidence from the random assignment of MBA peers. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(6):1401–1442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommer AA (1992) Corporate governance: The search for solutions. Univ. San Francisco Law Rev. 26(4):695–716.Google Scholar
• Stein JC (2002) Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized vs. hierarchical firms. J. Finance 57(5):1891–1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sufi A (2007) Information asymmetry and financing arrangements: Evidence from syndicated loans. J. Finance 62(2):629–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Nation (2016) Here’s why we can’t rely on shareholders to fix CEO pay. (May 4).Google Scholar
• Zimmerman D (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(1):9–23.Crossref, Google Scholar