Marketplace Scalability and Strategic Use of Platform Investment

References

• Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for Internet platforms. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(2):171–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu A, Bhaskaran SR, Mukherjee R (2019) An analysis of search and authentication strategies for online matching platforms. Management Sci. 65(5):2412–2431.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK (2021) Bundling for flexibility and variety: An economic model for multiproducer value aggregation. Management Sci. 67(4):2365–2380.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK (2022) The creator economy: Managing ecosystem supply, revenue sharing, and platform design. Management Sci. 68(7):5233–5251.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Sun D, Kim BC (2013) Commercialization of platform technologies: Launch timing and versioning strategy. Production Oper. Management 22(6):1374–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Wang K, Zhang XL (2022) Fending off critics of platform power with differential revenue sharing: Doing well by doing good? Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4545.Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Mukherjee R (2018) Platforms, pricing and piracy. Working paper, Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Mukherjee R (2021) Platform preannouncement strategies: The strategic role of information in two-sided markets competition. Management Sci. 67(3):1527–1545.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen P, Wu S (2012) The impact and implications of on-demand services on market structure. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):750–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Fan M, Li M (2016) Advertising vs. brokerage model for online trading platform. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(3):575–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S, Guo H (2011) The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):60–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Kim B-C (2010) Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):446–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Li M, Li Q (2020) Value of high-quality logistics: Evidence from a clash between SF Express and Alibaba. Management Sci. 66(9):3879–3902.Link, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2014) Marketplace or reseller? Management Sci. 61(1):184–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2020) Platforms and the exploration of new products. Management Sci. 66(4):1527–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Hao L, Guo H, Easley RF (2017) A mobile platform’s in-app advertising contract under agency pricing for app sales. Production Oper. Management 26(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Tafti A, Mithas S (2018) Platform sponsor investments and user contributions in knowledge communities: The role of knowledge seeding. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):213–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2013) Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Sci. 59(1):102–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang H, Parker G, Tan Y, Xu H (2020) Altruism or shrewd business? Implications of technology openness on innovations and competition. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1049–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hukal P, Henfridsson O, Shaikh M, Parker G (2020) Platform signaling for generating platform content. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1177–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Jerath K, Srinivasan K (2011) Firm strategies in the “mid tail” of platform-based retailing. Marketing Sci. 30(5):757–775.Link, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Rysman M (2015) Platform pricing at sports card conventions. J. Industry Econom. 63(4):704–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krämer J, Wiewiorra L (2012) Network neutrality and congestion sensitive content providers: Implications for content variety, broadband investment, and regulation. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1303–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Lin Z, Skiti T (2018) Review rating-based platform screening and new complementor entry: Evidence from natural experiment and machine learning of a sharing economy. Working paper, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A, Piezunka H (2018) Motivating the established, deterring the new: The divergent effect of platform competition on member contributions in digital mapping communities. Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Niculescu MF, Wu DJ, Xu L (2018) Strategic intellectual property sharing: Competition on an open technology platform under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):498–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2018) Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Sci. 64(7):3015–3032.Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspective 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan B, Anderson EG, Parker G (2020) Platform pricing and investment to drive third-party value creation in two-sided networks. Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):217–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2010) Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: A field experiment. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–961.Link, Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar