Network Effects and Multinetwork Sellers’ Dynamic Pricing in the U.S. Smartphone Market

References

• Ackerberg DA, Gowrisankaran G (2006) Quantifying equilibrium network externalities in the ACH banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):738–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arie G, Grieco PL (2014) Who pays for switching costs? Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(4):379–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Benkard CL, Levin J (2007) Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica 75(5):1331–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkard CL (2004) A dynamic analysis of the market for wide-bodied commercial aircraft. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(3):581–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(3):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):242–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjorkegren D (2019) The adoption of network goods: Evidence from the spread of mobile phones in Rwanda. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(3):1033–1060.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Orsini J, Yin P-L (2014) Platform choice by mobile app developers. Discussion paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2011) Dynamic price competition with network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou C, Derdenger T, Kumar V (2019) Linear estimation of aggregate dynamic discrete demand for durable goods: Overcoming the curse of dimensionality. Marketing Sci. 38(5):888–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Cromar SA (2010) Smartphones in the US: Market report. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2009) Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. 46(4):435–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-PH, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta PK (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Yang C (2020) Competition, product proliferation, and welfare: A study of the US smartphone market. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 12(2):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier), 1967–2072.Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Saloner G (1986) Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):940–955.Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Gordon BR (2011) Does AMD spur Intel to innovate more? J. Political Econom. 119(6):1141–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Rysman M (2012) Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1173–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Rysman M, Park M (2010) Measuring network effects in a dynamic environment (May 1). NET Institute Working Paper No. 10-03. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1647037.Google Scholar
• Igami M (2017) Estimating the innovator’s dilemma: Structural analysis of creative destruction in the hard disk drive industry, 1981–1998. J. Political Econom. 125(3):798–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasahara H, Shimotsu K (2012) Sequential estimation of structural models with a fixed point constraint. Econometrica 80(5):2303–2319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. 94(4):822–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1992) Product introduction with network externalities. J. Industry Econom. 40(1):55–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspective 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1987a) Entry deterrence in markets with consumer switching costs. Econom. J. (London) 97:99–117.Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1987b) Markets with consumer switching costs. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H (2010) Dynamics of pricing in the video game console market: Skimming or penetration? J. Marketing Res. 47(3):428–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dubé J-P (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Ostrovsky M, Berry S (2007) Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). RAND J. Econom. 38(2):373–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S (2004) Quantitative analysis of network externalities in competing technologies: The VCR case. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(4):937–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2010) Innovation, openness & platform control. Proc. 11th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 95–96.Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer M, Schmidt-Dengler P (2008) Asymptotic least squares estimators for dynamic games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):901–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes A (2014) Re-examining the effects of switching costs. Econom. Theory 57(1):161–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2004) Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):483–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) The art of standards wars. California Management Rev. 41(2):8–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinkinson M (2020) Pricing and entry incentives with exclusive contracts: Evidence from smartphones. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Sweeting A (2012) Dynamic pricing behavior in perishable goods markets: Evidence from secondary markets for major league baseball tickets. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1133–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiergraeber S (2022) Network effects and switching costs in the US wireless industry. Internat. Econom. Rev. 63(2):601–630.Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang C (2020) Vertical structure and innovation: A study of the SoC and smartphone industries. RAND J. Econom. 51(3):739–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Liu H, Chintagunta PK (2015) Wireless carriers’ exclusive handset arrangements: An empirical look at the iPhone. Customer Needs Solutions 2(2):177–190.Crossref, Google Scholar