Performance Evaluation, Managerial Hedging, and Contract Termination

References

• Aggarwal R, Samwick A (1999a) Executive compensation, strategic competition, and relative performance evaluation: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 54(6):1999–2043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Samwick A (1999b) The other side of the trade-off: The impact of risk on executive compensation. J. Political Econom. 107(1):65–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai H, Bhandari A (2021) Asset pricing with endogenously uninsurable tail risk. Econometrica 89(3):1471–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai H, Li R (2015) Investment and CEO compensation under limited commitment. J. Financial Econom. 116(3):452–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai H, Kiku D, Li R (2022) A quantitative model of dynamic moral hazard. Rev. Financial Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Albuquerque A (2009) Peer firms in relative performance evaluation. J. Accounting Econom. 48(1):69–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman E (1984) A further empirical investigation of the bankruptcy cost question. J. Finance 39(4):1067–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Bustamante C, Guibaud S, Zervos M (2018) Agency, firm growth, and managerial turnover. J. Finance 73(1):419–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrade G, Kaplan S (1998) How costly is financial (not economic) distress? Evidence from highly leveraged transactions that became distressed. J. Finance 53(5):1443–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antle R, Smith A (1986) An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. J. Accounting Res. 24(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barro J, Barro R (1990) Pay, performance, and turnover of bank CEOs. J. Labor Econom. 8(4):448–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):901–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis JC, Bizjak JM, Lemmon ML (2001) Managerial ownership, incentive contracting, and the use of zero-cost collars and equity swaps by corporate insiders. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 36(3):345–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Mariotti T, Plantin G, Rochet J (2007) Dynamic security design: Convergence to continuous time and asset pricing implications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):345–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bisin A, Rampini A, Gottardi P (2008) Managerial hedging and portfolio monitoring. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(1):158–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bizjak J, Kalpathy S, Li Z, Young B (2017) The role of peer firm selection in explicit relative performance awards. Working paper, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Chen H, Wang N (2011) A unified theory of Tobin’s q, corporate investment, financing, and risk management. J. Finance 66(5):1545–1578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Chen H, Wang N (2013) Market timing, investment, and risk management. J. Financial Econom. 109(1):40–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Wang N, Yang J (2019) Optimal contracting, corporate finance, and valuation with inalienable human capital. J. Finance 74(3):1363–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns N, Jindra J, Minnick K (2017) Sales of private firms and the role of CEO compensation. J. Corporate Finance 43:444–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiappori P-A, Macho I, Rey P, Salanié B (1994) Repeated moral hazard: The role of memory, commitment, and the access to credit markets. Eur. Econom. Rev. 38(8):1527–1553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvitanić J, Henderson V, Lazrak A (2014) On managerial risk-taking incentives when compensation may be hedged against. Math. Financial Econom. 8:453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2017) Moral hazard in dynamic risk management. Management Sci. 63(10):3328–3346.Link, Google Scholar
• DeMarzo P, Kaniel R (2017) Relative pay for non-relative performance: Keeping up with the Joneses with optimal contracts. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• DeMarzo P, Sannikov Y (2006) Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous-time agency model. J. Finance 61(6):2681–2724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMarzo P, Fishman M, He Z, Wang N (2012) Dynamic agency and the q theory of investment. J. Finance 67(6):2295–2340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Tella S, Sannikov Y (2021) Optimal asset management contracts with hidden savings. Econometrica 89(3):1099–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Gilbert T, Harford J, Hrdlicka C (2017) Precautionary savings with risky assets: When cash is not cash. J. Finance 72(2):793–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkender M, Wang R (2006) Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. J. Finance 61(4):1957–1990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Holmström B, Milgrom P (1990) Short-term contracts and long-term agency relationships. J. Econom. Theory 51(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao H (2010) Optimal compensation contracts when managers can hedge. J. Financial Econom. 97(2):218–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garvey G, Milbourn T (2003) Incentive compensation when executives can hedge the market: Evidence of relative performance evaluation in the cross section. J. Finance 58(4):1557–1582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong G, Li Y, Shin Y (2011) Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts. Accounting Rev. 86(3):1007–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR (2000) How big are the tax benefits of debt? J. Finance 55(5):1901–1941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guay W (1999) The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. J. Financial Econom. 53(1):43–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayashi F (1982) Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50(1):213–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z (2011) A model of dynamic compensation and capital structure. J. Financial Econom. 100(2):351–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z, Wei B, Yu J, Gao F (2017) Optimal long-term contracting with learning. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(6):2006–2065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann F, Pfeil S (2010) Reward for luck in a dynamic agency model. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(9):3329–3345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janakiraman S, Lambert R, Larcker D (1992) An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation hypothesis. J. Accounting Res. 30(1):53–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Murphy K (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J. Political Econom. 98(2):225–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenter D, Kanaan F (2015) CEO turnover and relative performance evaluation. J. Finance 70(5):2155–2184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin L (2002) CEO compensation, diversification, and incentives. J. Financial Econom. 66(1):29–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Strömberg P (2003) Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):281–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaniel R, Tompaidis S, Zhou T (2019) Impact of managerial commitment on risk taking with dynamic fund flows. Management Sci. 65(7):3174–3195.Link, Google Scholar
• Leland H (1994) Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. J. Finance 49(4):1213–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li R (2017) Dynamic agency with persistent observable shocks. J. Math. Econom. 71:74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econom. Statist. 51(3):247–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miao J, Rivera A (2016) Robust contracts in continuous time. Econometrica 84(4):1405–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Yermack D (2000) Taking stock: Equity-based compensation and the evolution of managerial ownership. J. Finance 55(3):1367–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ou-Yang H (2005) An equilibrium model of asset pricing and moral hazard. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1253–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2004) Why do firms use incentives that have no incentive effects? J. Finance 59(4):1619–1650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozdenoren E, Yuan K (2016) Contractual externalities and systemic risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(4):1789–1817.Google Scholar
• Rampini A, Viswanathan S (2013) Collateral and capital structure. J. Financial Econom. 109(2):466–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rampini A, Sufi A, Viswanathan S (2014) Dynamic risk management. J. Financial Econom. 111(2):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sannikov Y (2008) A continuous-time version of the principal-agent problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):957–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (2011) Fire sales in finance and macroeconomics. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(1):29–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams N (2015) A solvable continuous time dynamic principal-agent model. J. Econom. Theory 159(Part B):989–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu J (2013) Optimal contracts with shirking. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(2):812–839.Crossref, Google Scholar