Social Preferences of Young Professionals and the Financial Industry

References

• Abeler J, Nosenzo D (2015) Self-selection into laboratory experiments: Pro-social motives versus monetary incentives. Experiment. Econom. 18:195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams R, Barber B, Odean T (2016) Family, values, and women in finance. Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Alan S, Ertac S, Gumren M (2020) Cheating and incentives in a performance context: Evidence from a field experiment on children. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 179:681–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Algan Y, Benkler Y, Henry E, Hergueux J (2014) Social motives and the organization of production: Experimental evidence from open source software. Working Paper, Sciences Po, Paris.Google Scholar
• Ashton M, Lee K (2007) Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 11(2):150–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baran N, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2010) Can we infer social preferences from the lab? Evidence from the trust game. NBER Working Paper No. 15654, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Barfort S, Harmon N, Hjorth F, Olsen AL (2019) Sustaining honesty in public service: The role of selection. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 11(4):96–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A, Serneels P (2009) Reciprocity in the workplace. Experiment. Econom. 12:99–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A, Packard T, Serra D (2014) Participatory accountability and collective action: Experimental evidence from Albania. Eur. Econom. Rev. 68:250–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauman Y, Rose E (2011) Selection or indoctrination: Why do economics students donate less than the rest. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 79(3):318–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Spamann H (2010) Regulating bankers’ pay. Georgetown Law J. 98:247–287.Google Scholar
• Bell B, Van Reenen J (2014) Bankers and their bonuses. Econom. J. 124(574):F1–F21.Google Scholar
• Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):122–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluffstone R, Dannenberg A, Martinsson P, Jha P, Bista R (2020) Cooperative behavior and common pool resources: Experimental evidence from community forest user groups in Nepal. World Developement 129:104889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bors D, Stokes T (1998) Raven’s advanced progressive matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Edu. Psych. Measures 58(3):382–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Charness G (2011) The strategy versus direct response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Experiment. Econom. 14:375–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruhin A, Fehr E, Schunk D (2019) The many faces of human sociality: Uncovering the distribution and stability of social preferences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 17(4):1025–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen A, Sørensen E, Tungodden B (2013) When do we lie? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:258–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O, Nam PK (2014) Social preferences are stable over long periods of time. J. Public Econom. 117:104–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter J, Irons M (1991) Are economists different, and if so, why? J. Econom. Perspective 5(2):171–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chalmers J, Reuter J (2020) Is conflicted investment advice better than no advice? J. Financial Econom. 138:366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Robertson A (2020) What matters to individual investors? Evidence from the horse’s mouth. J. Finance 75(4):1965–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleave B, Nikiforakis N, Slonim R (2013) Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. Experiment. Econom. 16(3):372–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L (2014a) Fair wages and effort: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1777–1794.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal MA (2014b) A culture of cheating? Dishonesty and business culture in the banking industry. Nature 516:86–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal MA (2019) Selective participation may undermine replication attempts. Nature 575:E1–E2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Wagner G (2011) Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg N, Cumberland A, Guthrie I, Murphy B, Shepard S (2005) Age chances in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. J. Res. Adolescence 15(3):235–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellul A, Pagano M, Scognamiglio A (2020) Careers in finance. EIEF Working paper series, Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF), Rome.Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Gebhardt G (2016) Social dilemmas in the laboratory and in the field. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 128:85–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Google Scholar
• Eufinger C, Gill A (2017) Incentive-based capital requirements. Management Sci. 63(12):4101–4113.Link, Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) Consumer Markets Scoreboard: Making Markets Work for Consumers (European Commission, Brussels).Google Scholar
• Falk A, Meier S, Zehnder C (2013) Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):839–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Leibbrandt A (2011) A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the Tragedy of the Commons. J. Public Econom. 95:1144–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbarcher U, Föllmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise: An experimental study on cheating. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):541–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Jakiela P, Kariv S, Markovits D (2015) The distributional preference of an elite. Science 349(6254):aab0096.Google Scholar
• Frank B, Schulze G (2000) Does economics make citizens corrupt? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(1):101–113.Google Scholar
• Frey B, Meier S (2003) Are political economists selfish and indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment. Econom. Inquiry 41(3):448–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friebel G, Kosfeld M, Thielmann G (2019) Trust the police? Self-selection of motivated agents into the German police force. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 11(4):59–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galizzi M, Navarro-Martinez D (2019) On the external validity of social preference games: A systematic lab-field study. Management Sci. 65(3):976–1002.Link, Google Scholar
• Gambetta D (2000) Can we trust trust? Gambetta D, ed. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Blackwell Publishers), 213–237.Google Scholar
• Gennaioli N, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2015) Money doctors. J. Finance 70(1):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2008) Trusting the stock market. J. Finance 63(6):2557–2600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurun U, Stoffman N, Yonker S (2018) Trust busting: The effect of fraud on investor behavior. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1341–1376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanna R, Wang S-Y (2017) Dishonesty and selection into public service: Evidence from India. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 9(3):262–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33(2-3):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinz M, Schumacher H (2017) Signaling cooperation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 98:199–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoechle D, Ruenzi S, Schraub N, Schmid M (2018) Financial advice and bank profits. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(11):4447–4492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber C, Huber J (2020) Bad bankers no more? Truth-telling and (dis)honesty in the finance industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 180:472–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D (2005) Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerschbamer R, Neururer D, Gruber A (2019) Do altruists lie less? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 157:560–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostovetsky L (2016) Whom do you trust?: Investor-advisor relationships and mutual fund flows. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):898–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laury S, Taylor L (2008) Altruism spillovers: Are behaviors in context-free experiments predictive of altruism toward a naturally occurring public good? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 65(1):9–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Dow W, Kariv S (2017) Social preferences of future physicians. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 114(48):E10291–E10300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maggian V, Villeval MC (2016) Social preferences and lying aversion in children. Experiment. Econom. 19:663–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G, Ames R (1981) Economists free ride, does anyone else? J. Public Econom. 15(3):295–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philippon T, Reshef A (2012) Wages and human capital in the U.S. finance industry: 1909–2006. Quart. J. Econom. 127(4):1551–1609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahwan Z, Yoeli E, Fasolo B (2019) Heterogeneity in banker culture and its influence on dishonesty. Nature 575:345–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl A, Smeets P (2017) Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds. J. Finance 72(6):2505–2550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronen S (1994) An underlying structure of motivational need taxonomies: A cross-cultural confirmation. Triandis HC, Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 4, 2nd ed. (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 241–269.Google Scholar
• Rousseau D, Sitkin S, Burt R, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2006) A sceptic’s comment on the study of economics. Econom. J. 116(510):C1–C9.Google Scholar
• Rustagi D, Engel S, Kosfeld M (2010) Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330:961–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza P, Zingales L (2012) A trust crisis. Internat. Rev. Finance 12(2):123–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snowberg E, Yariv L (2021) Testing the waters: Behavior across participant pools. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(2):687–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stöckl T (2015) Dishonest or professional behavior? Can we tell? A comment on: Cohn et al. 2014, Nature 516, 86–89, “Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 8:64–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Kocher M (2007) Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games Econom. Behav. 59(2):364–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis J, Tanaka M (2018) Optimal pay regulation for too-big-to-fail banks. J. Financial Intermediary 33:83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thielmann I, Hilbig B (2015) The traits one can trust: Dissecting reciprocity and kindness as determinants of trustworthy behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(11):1523–1536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villeval MC (2014) Professional identity can increase dishonesty. Nature 516:48–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vischer T, Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Schupp J, Sunde U, Wagner GG (2013) Validating an ultra-short survey measure of patience. Econom. Lett. 120(2):142–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volk S, Thöni C, Ruigrok W (2012) Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81:664–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zingales L (2015) Does finance benefit society? J. Finance 70(4):1327–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar