Competition and Innovation in Markets for Technology

References

• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 122:701–728.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Draca M, Van Reenen J (2016) Trade induced technical change? The impact of chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):97–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allain M-L, Henry E, Kyle M (2016) Competition and the efficiency of markets for technology. Management Sci. 62(4):1000–1019.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Khanna T (2000) The structure of licensing contracts. J. Industry Econom. 1:103–135.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A (2000) The market for technology in the chemical industry: Causes and consequences. Rev. Econom. Industry 92:317–334.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A (2003) Licensing the market for technology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 52:277–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (2010) The market for technology. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of Economics of Innovation (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 17–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for the invention. Nelson RR, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athreye S, Cantwell J (2007) Creating competition? Globalization and the emergence of new technology producers. Res. Policy 36:209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagchi A (2008) Selling licenses for process innovation: The impact of the product market on the selling mechanism. Canadian J. Econom. 41(3):1015–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baggs J, Bettignies J-E (de) (2007) Product market competition and agency costs. J. Industry Econom. 55(2):289–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard A, Jensen B, Schott P (2006) Trade costs, firms, and productivity. J. Monetary Econom. 53:917–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettignies J-E (de), Duchêne A (2015) Product market competition and the financing of new ventures. Management Sci. 61(8):1849–1867.Link, Google Scholar
• Bettignies J-E (de), Ross TW (2014) Mergers, agency costs, and social welfare. J. Law Econom. Organ. 30(2):401–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O (2014) How do strategic factor markets respond to rivalry in the product market? Strategic Management J. 35(13):1952–1971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comino S, Galasso A, Graziano C (2019) Market power and patent strategies: Evidence from renaissance Venice. J. Industry Econom. 68(2):226–269.Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Papies D, van Heerde HJ (2016) Dealing with endogeneity: A nontechnical guide for marketing researchers. Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, eds. Handbook of Market Research (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 30–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erkal N (2015) Optimal licensing policy in differentiated industries. The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia 81(252):51–60.Google Scholar
• Erutku C, Richelle Y (2007) Optimal licensing contracts and the value of a patent. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(2):407–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauli Oller R, Sandonis J (2002) Welfare reducing licensing. Games Econom. Behav. 41:192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frésard L, Valta P (2016) How does corporate investment respond to increased entry threat? Rev. Financial Stud. 5:1–35.Google Scholar
• Gallini N (1984) Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(5):931–941.Google Scholar
• Gallini N, Winter R (1985) Licensing in the theory of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(2):237–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Stern S (2000) Incumbency and R&D incentives: Licensing the gale of creative destruction. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):485–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Stern S (2003) The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32:333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu DH, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destructive destruction. RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu DH, Stern S (2008) The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: Evidence from patent grant delays. Management Sci. 54(5):982–997.Link, Google Scholar
• Gosh A, Kato T, Morita H (2017) Incremental innovation and competitive pressure in the presence of discrete innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 135:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashmi A (2013) Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(5):1653–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Luo H (2018) Patent publication and the market for ideas. Management Sci. 64(2):571–586.Google Scholar
• Imbens G, Wooldridge JM (2007) Control Function and Related Methods. Lecture Notes 6 (NBER, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kamien M, Tauman Y (1986) Fees versus royalties and private value of a patent. Quart. J. Econom. 101:471–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M, Shapiro C (1986) How to license intangible property. Quart. J. Econom. 101:567–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Vonortas NS (2006) Determinants of technology licensing: The case of licensors. Management Decision Econom. 27:235–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo H (2014) When to sell your idea: Theory and evidence from the movie industry. Management Sci. 60(12):3067–3086.Link, Google Scholar
• Marshall G, Parra A (2019) Innovation and competition: The role of the product market. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 65:221–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muto S (1993) On licensing policies in Bertrand competition. Games Econom. Behav. 5:257–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raith M (2003) Competition, risk, and managerial incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93:1425–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robbins C (2009) Measuring payments for the supply and use of intellectual property. Reinsdorf M, Slaughter M, eds. International Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 139–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Allen Unwin, London).Google Scholar
• Sen D, Tauman Y (2007) General licensing schemes for cost-reducing innovation. Games Econom. Behav. 59:163–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheehan J, Martinez C, Guellec D (2007) Understanding Business Patenting and Licensing: Results of a Survey (OECD, Paris).Google Scholar
• Somaya D, Kim Y, Vonortas NS (2010) Exclusivity in licensing alliances: Using hostages to support technology commercialization. Strategic Management J. 32:159–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G (1958) The economies of scale. J. Law Econom. 1:54–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (2003) Innovation and competitive pressure. J. Industry Econom. 56(3):419–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2015) Control function methods in applied econometrics. J. Human Resources 50(2):420–445.Crossref, Google Scholar