Risky Sure Things

References

• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Spinu V (2020) Searching for the reference point. Management Sci. 66(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30(5):961–981.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE, Raiffa H (1988) Marginal value and intrinsic risk aversion. Bell DE, Raiffa H, Tversky A, eds. Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 384–397.Google Scholar
• Bell DE, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1977) Conflicting Objectives in Decisions (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Cillo A, Diecidue E (2010) A quantitative measurement of regret theory. Management Sci. 56(1):161–175.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Wakker PP (2001) Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Sci. 47(11):1498–1514.Link, Google Scholar
• Brockhaus RH (1982) The psychology of the entrepreneur. Kent CA, Sexton DL, Vesper KH, eds. Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 39–57.Google Scholar
• Connolly T, Zeelenberg M (2002) Regret in decision making. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 11(6):212–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs CH, Lehner PE (1981) Evaluation of two alternative models for a theory of risk: I. Are moments of distributions useful in assessing risk? J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 7(5):1110–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper AC, Woo CY, Dunkelberg WC (1988) Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J. Bus. Venturing 3(2):97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delquié P, Cillo A (2006) Disappointment without prior expectation: A unifying perspective on decision under risk. J. Risk Uncertainty 33(3):197–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinner I, Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG, Liu K (2011) Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 17(4):332–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1982) Relative risk aversion. Management Sci. 28(8):875–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Hershey JC, Kunreuther HC, Schoemaker PJ (1982) Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions. Management Sci. 28(8):936–954.Link, Google Scholar
• Holzmeister F, Huber J, Kirchler M, Lindner F, Weitzel U, Zeisberger S (2020) What drives risk perception? A global survey with financial professionals and laypeople. Management Sci. 66(9):3977–4002.Google Scholar
• Jachimowicz JM, Duncan S, Weber EU, Johnson EJ (2017) When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behav. Public Policy 3(2):159–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL (1996) Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92(3):537–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klos A, Weber EU, Weber M (2005) Investment decisions and time horizon: Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Management Sci. 51(12):1777–1790.Link, Google Scholar
• Knetsch JL, Sinden JA (1984) Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Quart. J. Econom. 99(3):507–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1047–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick R (1993) Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psych. Bull. 113(3):440–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick R, Boles TL (1995) Avoiding regret in decisions with feedback: A negotiation example. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 63(1):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclerc F, Schmitt BH, Dube L (1995) Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? J. Consumer Res. 22(1):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. (London) 92(368):805–824.Google Scholar
• Lopes LL (1983) Some thoughts on the psychological concept of risk. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 9(1):137–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellers B, Schwartz A, Ritov I (1999) Emotion-based choice. J. Experiment. Psych. General 128(3):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Weber EU (1997) Do risk attitudes reflect in the eye of the beholder? Marley AAJ, ed. Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 57–71.Google Scholar
• Newman GE, Mochon D (2012) Why are lotteries valued less? Multiple tests of a direct risk-aversion mechanism. Judgment Decision Making 7(1):19–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1975) Relation of perceived risk to preferences among gambles. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 1(1):86–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritov I, Baron J (1990) Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. J. Behav. Decision Making 3(4):263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritov I, Baron J (1992) Status-quo and omission bias. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U, Starmer C, Sugden R (2008) Third-generation prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schürmann O, Frey R, Pleskac TJ (2019) Mapping risk perceptions in dynamic risk‐taking environments. J. Behav. Decision Making 32(1):94–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurr PH (1987) Effects of gain and loss decision frames on risky purchase negotiations. J. Appl. Psych. 72(3):351–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (1995) Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1992) The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. 19(1):105–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U (2009) Direct risk aversion: Evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome. Psych. Sci. 20(6):686–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Weingart LR (1995) Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Acad. Management J. 38(6):1573–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P (1967) The relative influence of probabilities and payoffs upon perceived risk of a gamble. Psych. Sci. 9(4):223–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Sci. 236(4799):280–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spranca M, Minsk E, Baron J (1991) Omission and commission in judgment and choice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 27(1):76–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprenger C (2015) An endowment effect for risk: Experimental tests of stochastic reference points. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1456–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tombu M, Mandel DR (2015) When does framing influence preferences, risk perceptions, and risk attitudes? The explicated valence account. J. Behav. Decision Making 28(5):464–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Osch SM, Wakker PP, Van Den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM (2004) Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities. Medical Decision Making 24(5):511–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU (1988) A descriptive measure of risk. Acta Psychologica 69(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Bottom WP (1989) Axiomatic measures of perceived risk: Some tests and extensions. J. Behav. Decision Making 2(2):113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Hsee C (1998) Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes toward perceived risk. Management Sci. 44(9):1205–1217.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Milliman RA (1997) Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Sci. 43(2):123–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz NE (2002) A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decision Making 15(4):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Shafir S, Blais AR (2004) Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psych. Rev. 111(2):430–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates JF, Stone ER (1992) The risk construct. Yates JF, ed. Risk-Taking Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 1–25.Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M (1999) Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(2):93–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Beattie J, van der Pligt J, de Vries NK (1996) Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(2):148–158.Crossref, Google Scholar