Empirical Model of Dynamic Merger Enforcement—Choosing Ownership Caps in U.S. Radio

References

• Aguirregabiria V, Magesan A (2013) “Euler equations for the estimation of dynamic discrete choice structural models. Structural Econometric Models, vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 3–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Chen X (2003) Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions. Econometrica 71(6):1795–1843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Miller RA (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Bayer P, Blevins JR, Ellickson PB (2016) Estimation of dynamic discrete choice models in continuous time with an application to retail competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(3):889–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Vickers J (2010) A model of delegated project choice. Econometrica 78(1):213–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Benkard CL, Levin J (2007) Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica 75(5):1331–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkard CL, Bodoh-Creed A, Lazarev J (2010) Simulating the dynamic effects of horizontal mergers: U.S. airlines. Technical report, Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
• Berry ST, Waldfogel J (1999) Mergers, station entry, and programming variety in radio broadcasting. NBER Working Paper No. 7080, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Berry ST, Waldfogel J (2001) Do mergers increase product variety? Evidence from radio broadcasting. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):1009–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2003) Horizontal mergers with free-entry: Why cost efficiencies may be a weak defense and asset sales a poor remedy. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(5):607–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collard-Wexler A (2014) Mergers and sunk costs: An application to the ready-mix concrete industry. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 6(4):407–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collard-Wexler A, Gowrisankaran G, Lee RS (2019) “Nash-in-Nash” bargaining: A microfoundation for applied work. J. Political Econom. 127(1):163–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U, Judd KL (2012) Avoiding the curse of dimensionality in dynamic stochastic games. Quant. Econom. 3(1):53–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drushel BE (1998) The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and radio market structure. J. Media Econom. 11(3):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):53–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Shapiro C (1990) Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):107–126.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (2003) Review of the radio industry. Technical report, Media Bureau Industry Analysis Division, Washington DC.Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G (1999) A dynamic model of endogenous horizontal mergers. RAND J. Econom. 30(1):56–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Holmes TJ (2004) Mergers and the evolution of industry concentration: Results from the dominant-firm model. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):561–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harford J (2005) What drives merger waves? J. Financial Econom. 77(3):529–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igami M, Uetake K (2020) Mergers, innovation, and entry-exit dynamics: Consolidation of the hard disk drive industry, 1996–2016. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(6):2672–2702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeziorski P (2014a) Effects of mergers in two-sided markets: The US radio industry. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 6(4):35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeziorski P (2014b) Estimation of cost efficiencies from mergers: Application to US radio. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):816–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamien MI, Zang I (1990) The limits of monopolization through acquisition. Quart. J. Econom. 105(2):465–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kryukov Y (2018) Dynamic R&D and the effectiveness of policy intervention in the pharmaceutical industry. GSIA Working Papers 2015-E33, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
• Leeper S.E (1999) Game of radiopoly: An antitrust perspective of consolidation in the radio industry. Federal Comm. Law J. 52(2):9.Google Scholar
• Lyons BR (2003) Could politicians be more right than economists? A theory of merger standards. Technical report, EUI RSC.Google Scholar
• Marino AM, Zábojník J (2006) Merger, ease of entry and entry deterrence in a dynamic model. J. Indust. Econom. 54(3):397–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazzeo MJ, Seim K, Varela M (2018) The welfare consequences of mergers with endogenous product choice. J. Indust. Econom. 66:980–1016.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers Econometrics, 105–142.Google Scholar
• Mermelstein B, Nocke V, Satterthwaite MA, Whinston MD (2020) Internal versus external growth in industries with scale economies: A computational model of optimal merger policy. J. Political Econom. 128(1):301–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller RA (1984) Job matching and occupational choice. J. Political Econom. 92(6):1086–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motta M, Vasconcelos H (2005) Efficiency gains and myopic antitrust authority in a dynamic merger game. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 23(9–10):777–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2000) Mergers with differentiated products: The case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. RAND J. Econom. 31(3):395–421.Google Scholar
• Nocke V, Whinston MD (2010) Dynamic merger review. J. Political Econom. 118(6):1201–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nocke V, Whinston MD (2013) Merger policy with merger choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(2):1006–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A (1986) Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica 54(4):755–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Ostrovsky M, Berry S (2007) Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). RAND J. Econom. 38(2):373–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu LD, Zhou W (2007) Merger waves: A model of endogenous mergers. RAND J. Econom. 38(1):214–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodrigues V (2001) Endogenous mergers and market structure. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 19(8):1245–1261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeting A (2010) The effects of horizontal mergers on product positioning: Evidence from the music radio industry. RAND J. Econom. 41(2):372–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeting A (2013) Dynamic product positioning in differentiated product industries: The effect of fees for musical performance rights on the commercial radio industry. Econometrica 81(5):1763–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade of Commission (2010) Horizontal merger guidelines. http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.pdf.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1968) Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare tradeoffs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 58(1):18–36.Google Scholar
• Wolpin KI (1984) An estimable dynamic stochastic model of fertility and child mortality. J. Political Econ. 92(5):852–874.Crossref, Google Scholar